The Silverstone checklist page does say that "attendees can provide some basic data" for the Event Research Programme to help link any covid tests they may take after the event to their attendance.
The only ERP information we have so far is a report on the first wave of trial events, which took place in April and May. When case numbers were 20 times lower than they are now.
Even these found some evidence of likely transmission at trial events.
The Executive Summary claims the Event Research Programme is a "world-leading study" which would gather "large amounts of data before, during and after" events.
But the Observations say the study design was "insufficient" and few people took tests both before *and* after events!
But instead of making the study design more robust, later events seem to have thrown out any pretence of science, and don't even ask people to take tests after the event!
It all looks like a flimsy excuse to let major events go ahead as planned before restrictions are lifted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
90%+ intention to get vaccinated in 18-25 age groups.
So what's going on? 🤔
Meanwhile the government is denying renewed reports of a shortage of the Pfizer vaccine.
Maybe they aren't being entirely honest? It would certainly explain the slow progress in vaccinating under 40s, as AstraZeneca isn't used in those age groups.
A timely reminder that even young, healthy people can be affected by severe long covid after having the virus.
This poor woman has suffered over a year of health problems, including blood clots on the lungs and heart inflammation. She's been largely housebound since March 2020!
Lifting all remaining covid rules when cases are rising rapidly in young people who aren't fully vaccinated yet (and, in the case of children, don't even have the option of being vaccinated yet) means many thousands more will suffer months of serious long term health problems.
The idea that it will all just magically be fine because it's summer and cases were very low last summer is clearly nonsense.
Covid is not seasonal. We've had major waves starting in March, September, December and June.
Cases in July are now as high as they were in December!
If you zoom in, there's a precipitous rise in cases from June 20th - 21st, almost doubling overnight, a week after Scotland's first match of the tournament.
Which is roughly how long you'd expect it to take for people to start showing symptoms and book a test.
I wonder what @QMUL thinks of @profnfenton retweeting a post from an anti-vax conspiracy nut accusing colleague @dgurdasani1 of "misrepresenting the data" on covid deaths amongst vaccinated people?
Particularly ironic given Fenton's own record of mangling data...
Unsurprisingly, Dr Syed's claim that vaccination *increases* your risk of dying if you catch covid by 73% is utter nonsense.
A quick look at the ONS data shows the proportion of covid deaths in the oldest (most vaccinated) age groups has been falling. Exactly as you'd expect.
His whole argument rests on either ignoring the age of people who were vaccinated entirely or (in a later post) assuming that everyone who died was elderly.
Which, as I've just shown above, is far from true.
The latest nonsense from @hartgroup_org members @ClareCraigPath and @profnfenton is that there's no danger from rising cases because they're not real (they are), hospital admissions aren't rising (they are), and asymptomatic testing isn't showing any rise (it is).