rivm.nl/sites/default/…
Aangezien er sinds feb 2020 slechts 199 mensen <70 zonder onderliggende aandoeningen zijn overleden op een bevolking van 17,5m zou ik het waarderen als ik niet gediscrimineerd zou worden als ik de veiligheidsstudies van de 'vaccins' af wil wachten (2023).
Al helemaal omdat nu uit de real-world data blijkt dat transmissie helemaal niet verminderd wordt door de experimentele 'vaccins'. De discriminatie is dus ook onterecht. Gevaccineerden kunnen nog steeds het virus spreiden in dezelfde mate.
En nee, dit is geen 'toeval'. De databases gaan namelijk verder terug dan 2020-2021 en deze meldingen kwamen in deze mate totaal niet voor bij traditionele vaccins.
"Knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment."
Rate of vaccine deaths has multiplied much and much faster (>90) than amount of vaccinations (<2).
This is data from the USA.
There’s an annual flu shot for the older people and Americans tend to have many vaccinations.
For example, this includes all the child vaccinations too.
Common errors from the vaccine church in calculating risk-benefit analysis:
- assumes 'vaccine' 100% effective (completely wrong, see PHE data)
- often neglects age and comorbidities in analysis
- neglects probable life-long strong natural immunity against all 'variants'
- often compares to one side-effect (eg. blood clots or myocarditis) instead of the cumulative possibilities of side-effects (many)
- assumes life-long vaccine protection instead of (semi-) annual vaccination rounds
- neglects Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) risk
- takes into analysis the risk of only the 1st or the 2nd shot instead of both
- neglects vaccine sickness. >25% unable to do normal daily activities
In Holland @Gezondheidsraad opens up the experimental 'vaccine' for the age 12-17.
Reasons:
- reduce spread (false assumption, no proof)
- reduce chance of lockdown (Government's fault, not the 'virus')
- no more testing (dito)
- not be 2nd grade citizen
Zero individual medical reasons are given.
There's also no room for ethics at all.
Let's check qcovid.org/Calculation
It doesn't go under 19, so I take an age of 19 w/o comorbidities for this example.
Risk of hospital admission: 0,0023%.
So this is even smaller for age 12-18.
Kids have very little to fear of C19.
While they have to fear for the experimental gene therapy without known LT risks.
In Israel myocarditis was found in 1 of 3,000-6,000 young men
That is already much higher than the risk of C19.
This is a serious issue
How come that:
in the Age group>50: 88% of the cases have been found in the vaccinated group?
Must be higher than the vaccine uptake in that age group.
IFR significantly higher in Vax than in NoVax group.
Not for >50
Is this Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) that was warned about?
88% of the cases in the vaccinated group definitely destroys the case of the discriminating and blackmailing vaccine passports!
One of the ugliest governmental laws ever introduced.
Serious problems.
'staff shortages'
But many pilots and attendants sitting at home because of significantly reduced flight schedule, right.
Do people believe this?
Staff having blood clots issues after v@x?
We need transparency.
Blood clots can form in the deep veins (veins below the surface that are not visible through the skin) of your legs during travel because you are sitting still in a confined space for long periods of time.
many who follow me are on the right way, but from my perspective are working from wrong assumptions.
Can we stop talking about 'transmission' and 'variants' until this has been proven?
SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and the genome is around 50% or more computer simulated.
'Variants' are just the same disease with the same symptoms but then they find different RNA code and use even more interpretation and simulation to overlay this on the already simulated genome.
'Variants' are to scare us, i.e. Scariants.
'Transmission' is also not proven.
They call it 'transmission' when people get the disease, were in proximity, and both test positive for only a small part of the RNA code (often only 1-2 target genes)
Why was it not the conditions the 2 people were in?