Thread by @Apotheiite

There are so many 'heresies' to contend with within the sphere of European religion that it makes efforts to meaningfully convert people mostly a joke. Even if you succeed initially, they can so easily be led astray and come into a position where apostasy is inevitable.

The truth is that calling our religio in its current state a "tradition" is at best mere rhetoric. Not because it can't become a tradition, but because what that tradition entails is an awful mess of disagreements and inconsistencies. Such cannot be meaningfully called tradition.

I'm not ignorant to there being a tinge of irony in my criticism, given I also am just one of many persons espousing a view I believe is true against others who believe their own version to be true; but so long we are in such a state of disorder, there'll be no lasting revival.

Theological chaos is corrosive and contrary to pax deorum. Those who embrace it, making out doctrine and dogma as 'evils' of Abrahamic religion, are merely analogical to modern liberal/pomo cultural attitudes. Orthopraxy was the ancient dogma. It was not ad hoc nor anachronistic.

"But we should restore orthopraxy, not establish doctrine/dogma."

The fact orthopraxy was not anachronistic means the very notion of 'restoration' when applied to orthopraxy is in itself a contradiction. There will be no success in being unconscious to the needs of the day.

In the face of today's chaotic individuated conceptualism, we MUST advance the universal truth that transcends all individuated ideation, the regimenting truth that disciplines our souls into righteous and proper communion with the whole of the cosmic and the divine.

Whatever little or great I can do to serve this end, I intend to do, but the deficit of sentiment for what should be viewed as a natural step of progression for us is bitter to face. May the Gods urge us towards loving harmony with them as much as we should, and yet do not.