Abolish billionaires. Nobody needs, or can even use, that much money. There should be an upper limit on wealth. Once you hit $100 million or whatever, anything above that is automatically put towards healthcare, education, and housing.
It's difficult to fully comprehend just how much money one billion dollars is, so let me give you a reference:
One billion is one thousand million.
1,000,000,000
Let's say my friend Catherine who is 35 found a bag with $1 billion in the forest one day. And let's say she lives to 100.
If she spent $25,000 every day for the rest of her life, she'd still have $406 MILLION dollars LEFT on her hundredth birthday.
Jeff Bezos is worth an estimated $205 billion. That's TWO HUNDRED AND FIVE THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS for those in the back of the room.
If he lived to 100 years old and spent $130,000 every day for the rest of his life, he would still have $203 billion left of that net worth. And that's assuming he never earned another dime from today.
"But Morten, he doesn't actually have $205 billion, it's his net worth, an abstract valuation!" That's kinda my point. If he spends $130,000 EVERY DAY UNTIL HE TURNS ONE HUNDRED, he has spent just over ONE PERCENT of his net worth.
So yeah, abolish billionaires. Nobody can spend that much money in a lifetime, and more importantly nobody should be able to hold on to that level of wealth and power. It's injust. It's obscene.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
10 years ago today, a far-right terrorist murdered 77 people in Oslo and on Utøya in Norway. Most of the victims were teenagers at a summer camp. The toxic ideologies and hate speech the terrorist adhered to still flourish online. In fact, they are more prevalent today.
On the 10th anniversary of one of the worst terror attacks in Europe since World War II, international media is largely silent. It's difficult to tell the story of a white christian right-wing terrorist when all people want to hear is that terrorism is something other do to them.
The world did not learn from the Norway attacks. The online echo chambers inside which the terrorist got radicalized are more powerful than ever, and people are being radicalized quicker than ever.
10 years ago, I woke up to the news a terrorist had tried to kill my friends. Two hours later, teens at a summer camp on an island started tweeting: someone was shooting at them.
By the end of the day the terrorist had murdered 77 people, most of them teenagers aged 14-18. He considered them traitors to the country for being members of the social democratic Labour party and assigned himself the duty of carrying out their death sentence.
10 years ago this week I spent the day online in a panicked state, trying to contact my friends and correcting the terribly misinformed assumptions broadcast over social media and North American news about who the terrorist might be.
This story illustrates the complexities of designing modern technology to augment human interaction. It's not enough that it works; potential use cases and their consequences must be considered, and guidelines established to avoid harm #techethics#ethicsmercurynews.com/2019/03/08/fre…
Telemedicine is a challenging subject exposing many of the #ethics, social, and technology issues we're going to be facing in the near future.
The hospital my parents worked at explored telemedicine over video link in the mid-1990s. The problem they we're designing for was how to provide access to expert and specialist treatment in remote areas without having to physically ship a doctor, often by helicopter.
We need to have a conversation about #OpenSource and equity. Particularly, we need to talk about how "decisions are made by those who show up" should be amended to read "decisions are made by those who CAN AFFORD to show up" and what that means for our industry.
The origins of the Open Source movement are rooted in equity + distribution of power: Rather than large corporations controlling both the product, the tooling, and who gets to work on either, the user has full autonomy to create, contribute, distribute, and maintain everything.
This is built on an underlying assumption that everyone has equal ability and availability to actually take part in the Open Source community. From this stems the idea of open source software/hardware being built by the people who use it. That's no longer true in my opinion.
I have long argued 1991 was a pivotal year for modern music. Allow me to explain why in this Friday feel-good #thread. #TheYearWas1991
For many genres, 1991 was a watershed moment. The albums released in that year often represent the start of a whole new generation of music. #TheYearWas1991
In this thread I aim to demonstrate how the music released in 1991 is still relevant today, either as parts of the public consciousness, cultural reference, or even as music still played on radio, TV, and probably on your computer or smartphone. #TheYearWas1991