Reflecting upon Jonathan Green's talk yesterday about Demand-Avoidance is relational to each other. My thinking has been to separate demands & avoidance to make it reflect transactional understandings of PDA; which we all should be working with.
I am making a subtle but important change to "Demand Avoidance Phenomena", to "Demand-Avoidance Phenomena". I think I will add the hyphen whenever using a "full name" for PDA.
One thing that I recalled is how in Newson's first publication on PDA in 1983, she calls "Pathological demand-avoidance syndrome". There are signs of a transactional perspective being taken, like how roleplay/ fantasy seems to be a coping mechanism.
If you check Newson's next publication in 1989 there is no hyphen. Probably similarly named in later Newson's PDA scholarship. I just think it is ironic how using the hyphen in PDA's full names, is going full circle.
Also upon reflecting on it. One can argue it is a better way to formulate PDA, is to break it up into its constituent features, than treating it is whole entity.
The reason for this is that strategies, "treatment" are issues/ symptom specific, not diagnoses specific. So by breaking PDA into individual features, clinicians can create bespoke strategies "treatment" plans for those with PDA.
So trauma present gets it's own strategies/ "treatment".
ADHD -hyperactivity features, get it's own strategies/ "treatment".
Anxiety features get it's own strategies/ "treatment".
And so on.
Which is more person centered than going here are the PDA strategies
@threadreaderapp please could you unroll?

Thank you in advance.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Richard Woods

Richard Woods Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Richard_Autism

21 Jul
That moment when you discover you have been stressing over a deadline, that does not even matter! Avoidable, avoidance of demands!!!!!!!!! Argh!
My response:
PDA as a term, seems not to be mentioned. There are also other issues that it is unethical to favour viewing PDA as an ASD over its other proposed outlooks, when they await direct empirical testing...
Read 27 tweets
20 Jul
This is a fundamental reason why I am so annoyed that key "PDA is an ASD" have not tried to investigate if divergent outlooks on PDA are valid. They basically assumed that their own views on PDA are correct & everyone else's is mistaken (& also on autism).
It is so arrogant to only conduct research & advocate for PDA as an ASD, despite the literature being contested, with both evidence & other experts stating PDA is seen outside of autism. Also PDA maybe other things, like an Attachment Disorder.
It is NOT scientific to only conduct research to support one outlook on the topic, such as PDA is an ASD (this has been happening). Researchers should not be favouring any particular outlook over another.
Read 26 tweets
19 Jul
Tomorrow is the PARC PDA event: Understanding PDA. Speaker order is:
Keith Howie.
Jonathan Green.
@Richard_Autism (no idea who that is - joke).
Grace Trundle.
Then Round table.

Most/ All the talks should be recorded.
My slides are already added to LSBU's repository & I have a video ready to go on @autimedes based on my talk. I will add the slides to my researchgate on Wednesday (when LSBU slides embargo is lifted).
Dani Ropar should be hosting and doing the intro.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jul
@SamFellowesHPS I think from those advocating PDA as an ASD, are referring to the entire autistic population, which confusingly includes any non-autistic persons with PDA. So I think they view it a bit like this.
@SamFellowesHPS That PDA is dimensional, perpendicular to autism severity/ functioning (yes I know this is a false dichotomy & flawed conceptualisation of autism).
@SamFellowesHPS Sorry, you should want this image.
Read 24 tweets
11 Jul
@SamFellowesHPS Oh Sam, sometimes your comments make me gush in admiration. Nick Chown often elicits a similar response from me, & I am happy he has agreed to be a panel examiner on my first PhD deadline. I will do my best to respond to your comments.
@SamFellowesHPS Science tends to go through paradigm shifts, especially when something is severely critiqued at odds with predictions. Physics to some extent is evolving again due to recent research results.
@SamFellowesHPS One could argue our understanding of Disorders is due a major paradigm change. I think there is a credible case to stop using them.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jul
Dimensional approach to PDA, & yet it is meant to be a rare ASD subtype. How exactly is taking a narrow definition of PDA (hence its rare ASD subtype), fits in with broader spectrum nature of disorders & how narrow categories do not reflect human nature?
Point is, how is adopting a narrow definition & approaching PDA as a rare ASD subtype; inline with current understandings of human nature, that disorders & most human characteristics are spectrum in nature & overlap each other? How exactly is it dimensional?
Or this another one these things, where a PDA is an ASD supporters are essentially trying to blag it & hope no-one actually checks it?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!