1/ Most of you reading this know that I teach video games at a university; used to review video games at Indiewire; have been an avid gamer since the Intellivision dropped in 1979; and study digital culture as an academic. But one thing I was never interested in was mobile games.
2/ Up until the pandemic, I thought of mobile gaming as *most* people still do: full of low-quality time-wasters and money-suckers whose most popular exemplars show up in annoying TV/Instagram ads that suggest the only audience being sought for them is kids. I hear this critique.
3/ But as a regular Twitter user, I'm on my phone a lot. And as a human living through a pandemic and a domestic insurgency, like many of you I've found myself down quite a bit over the past year. And so once or twice I tried playing a game on my phone to take my mind off things.
4/ I didn't think much of those games—but I felt like there was something there. I'd lost the attention span for console games around the time of Trump's election—I suspect a connection—but playing games for 10 or 20 minutes every once in a while felt doable. And maybe enjoyable?
5/ So I started doing research. What were the best mobile games out there? What I found was... odd. Some lists seemed thoughtful, but honestly a great many of them were so focused on co-op games and so little concerned about microtransactions that their suggestions were... awful.
6/ And I started noticing that all the ads I saw on TV or Instagram for mobile games were for—well—pretty *awful* mobile games. I wondered: was it really so hard to find an amazing piece of digital entertainment to play on a device most of us have with us at all times every day?
7/ Once I found a few great mobile games—and by that I mean, *great* pieces of digital art that would be "great" on any hardware—I looked to see whether there was a review series (like the sort I'd once done for digital art generally at Indiewire) focused on art in mobile gaming.
8/ I just couldn't find any review series where a reviewer said (a) here, transparently, is my perspective and biases; (b) I'm going to work over time to hone a list of recommended games; (c) I'm going to specifically celebrate art and innovation and imagination in mobile gaming.
9/ So, what is "Top 100 Android Video Games"? It's an ongoing project intended to serve anyone who has ever wanted to experience beauty and joy and a sense of focus and wonder via their phone. It will be filled with videos that amaze you and a guide for finding games you'll love.
10/ Genres considered by the series:
🔴 Action
🟠 Adventure
🟡 Board Game
🟢 Card Game
🔵 Fighting
🟣 Platformer
🟤 Puzzle
🔴 Racing
🟠 Rhythm
🟡 RPG
🟢 Shooter
🔵 Simulation
🟣 Sports
🟤 Strategy
11/ But I also put my biases at the bottom of each entry in the series—so you understand my philosophy of what mobile gaming can add to one's life that's *healthy* and *important*. Many things you might think a mobile gamer would be OK with, I'm not OK with, and I say so clearly.
12/ I suspect 95% of readers of this feed will say one of five things in response to this thread: (1) I don't play video games anymore; (2) video games are for kids; (3) video games aren't healthy; (4) I don't play games on my cell; or (5) I don't need help finding games to play.
13/ It's not my place to talk anyone out of anything. I'll just say that if you think you can imagine the scope of the art this new PROOF series recommends, I assure you, you can't. There are games here whose sole purpose is to make you pay attention to light. To color. To sound.
14/ There are games here to make you laugh. To immerse you in stories told only through words. To make your brain hurt—in the good way—by testing your intelligence. There are games here of shocking beauty. Games with music that moves you.
Games that will, in sum total, move you.
15/ What you won't find here are games intended to take your money, waste your time, or become unhealthy obsessions. Most can be played in short spurts that are meditative and increase your focus and simply make your day *brighter*. I'm not interested in pushing unhealthy habits.
SAMPLE GAMES/ The Procession to Calvary (#52)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Sine the Game (#48)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Iris and the Giant (#34)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Tender: Creature Comforts (#60)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Lyxo (#49)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Unruly Heroes (#24)
SAMPLE GAMES/ Huntdown (#19)*
*Yes, all of the 80s kitsch is intentional.
16/ That's just a quick taste of just this first entry in the series—which will be honing itself entry by entry, with new games being added and new games being dropped, in an ongoing attempt to create the best imaginable guide for people who want to expand their phone's utility.
17/ Some games I won't even tweet the trailer for, as it wouldn't be fair to the game. Blind Drive (#51) is played with headphones—you don't need to look at the screen as you play, because the screen is irrelevant—and it's one of the most intense gaming experiences I've ever had.
18/ Other games are ill-served by their trailers because they're so immersive that while you play them in bursts—which is what I've come to love about mobile gaming, as I have a ton to do, and only have brief windows of time to game—you really need to experience them first-hand.
19/ The sad thing about this series is that I started it as it looked like the pandemic was easing up. Now I fear we'll all be socially distancing and even staying indoors more this fall. That means more folks will need mobile games, but it's tragic that it's worked out this way.
20/ What folks often now call "distraction" is just as frequently "focus." When I play a meditative mobile game, yes, I'm "distracting" myself from my swirling thoughts—but that "distraction" is actually a moment of quiet, focus, attention, beauty, and calm. Does that make sense?
21/ I really believe that, whether it's an ingeniously simple card game like Threes (#23) or an ornate narrative like FAR: Lone Sails (#78), as things continue to be tough for all of us gaming in *short spurts* can be profoundly therapeutic—but only if the game is worth the time.
22/ So I hope that—whether you're an admirer of digital art but not a gamer, a casual gamer, or a hardcore gamer—you'll check out this series via your PROOF subscription. I'm certain that you'll see what I'm doing with the series over time—and what I hope it can add to the world.
23/ And I hope it goes without saying that I accept recommendations! Subscribers can always check in to recommend I try a certain game—or, if you like, to quibble with an entry or exclusion—and I promise to take those views and suggestions seriously. (PROOF readers are the best!)
24/ Remember that the purpose of PROOF is to be an archive as well as a new-content-producing publication. If you love a series—say "Lost Classics of the 1960s" or "Insurrection Update"—you can plum the depths of all prior entries. The same goes for this new mobile-gaming series!
25/ Because each entry will have various features—new trailers, new rankings, new reviews, new summaries of games that dropped or missed the cut, and so on—I'm hopeful fans of the series will find many reasons to return to earlier entries. So—*enjoy*! /end sethabramson.substack.com/p/the-top-100-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Political analysts who didn't understand what Trump meant when he said, in Phoenix, that certain legislators in Arizona want to go "several steps beyond" what anyone would expect them to do are AWOL from their jobs.
There is a plot afoot to try to "decertify" Arizona's electors.
Can Arizona decertify its electors? No—of course not. But was Arizona Senate president Karen Fann lying when she said the audit was about 2024—not 2020? Yes. Arizona legislators plan to decertify Biden electors—forcing a lawsuit to prevent other states from trying to do the same.
Trump's plan is to promote fake audits in every battleground state he lost that's controlled by Republicans, ending in a decertification of electors in those states. That'll force lawsuits that have to go to SCOTUS. Trump says SCOTUS can't overrule legislatures (which is insane).
This person is an Oath Keeper and an insurrectionist leader—and connected to individuals who were in Trump's war rooms prior to January 6. She's a dangerous seditionist, and PROOF has written about her. She's one of the five most deranged state legislators in the United States.
So we shouldn't read her remarks and think of her as just a lunatic, white supremacist, or domestic extremist—though she's all these things. She wants to destroy America by transforming it from a democracy to a fascist state. She's a clear and present danger to national security.
To the extent Trump and his thugs are hoping for further seditious violence, all the evidence we have now suggests Wendy Rogers (and her Arizona co-conspirator Mark Finchem) will be working with Ali Alexander to plot what's next. If the FBI isn't watching her, Wray must be fired.
(THREAD) A TRUE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JANUARY 6
1⃣ PELOSI names the members of the Committee, which include Rep. Liz CHENEY (R-WY).
Q: Is the Committee bipartisan?
A: ✅.
Q: How many Republicans are on the Committee?
A: 1⃣.
2⃣ PELOSI contacts House Minority Leader Kevin MCCARTHY (R-CA) to inform him that she has accepted the majority of his GOP submissions to the Committee.
Q: Is the Committee bipartisan?
A: ✅.
Q: How many Republicans are on the Committee?
A: 4⃣.
3⃣ Because Nancy PELOSI had rejected two of the Committee proposals made by MCCARTHY—in both instances because MCCARTHY wanted men on the Committee *who are witnesses in the case the Committee is investigating*—MCCARTHY ordered 3⃣ of the 4⃣ Republicans on the Committee to resign.
I don't think CNN or other cable networks should run insurrectionist press conferences anymore. Right now my TV shows at least 2 Trump co-conspirators being given a stage to say that the only people that need to be investigated over the GOP-incited January 6 attack are Democrats.
In a serious country, it's not "news" when thousands of major-media reports establish that an armed insurrection was coordinated by Republicans and then two Republicans implicated in those reports call a presser to demand a probe of their political opponents.
That's just lunacy.
McCarthy, Jordan, and the rest of the insurrectionists have made clear time and time again that the phrase "we need to find out why we were so ill-prepared for January 6" is code for their conspiracy theory that Pelosi and Bowser conspired with the USCP to "let" January 6 happen.
(🔐) NEW at PROOF: An Updated List of Trumpworld Figures Who Have Been Criminally Investigated or Referred, Impeached, Arrested, or Convicted, As Well As Those Who Are Presently Fugitives From Justice
(NOTE) The list isn't just alphabetized and divided into more than a dozen categories, it also indicates which individuals received pardons from Trump and which sought his intervention in their cases. The list will continue to be updated as more Trumpworld figures are arrested.
(NOTE2) PROOF readers are the absolute best. They already caught two names I missed. The list is now well over 70. Most articles you find on major media—I don't know why—poop out at 5 to 8. That's a tragedy. This new PROOF list is likely to surpass 100 as I continue work on it.
The only reason Rand Paul is going after Dr. Fauci with what he knows is a lie—one that endangers Fauci and increases vaccine hesitancy nationwide—is because *he* knows, and *we* know, and the whole *world* knows that Paul's boss, Trump, killed hundreds of thousands with his lies
If Trump's lies about the election and the insurrection of January 6 weren't already the "Big Lie," his thousands of COVID-19 lies—which caused *exponentially* more death than his ongoing insurgency—would now be referred to as the "Big Lie," and Paul would be one of the Big Liars
I don't know when—it might be 5, 15, or 50 years from now—academics will study how many deaths can rightly be attributed to Trump's acts and omissions since 2015, and I've no doubt the figure will be in the 6 figures, with the only question being whether it'll be higher than that