In case it isn't clear: Since June 1st, cases and deaths have been running 40-50% higher per capita in red counties than in blue counties.
⚠️ UPDATE: w/yesterday's data added, new cases are running 53% higher per capita & new deaths are running 57% higher in the red counties.
And that's not including Nebraska or Florida--NE has stopped reporting county-level data altogether; FL is reporting cases but not deaths (?)
To clarify: the case rates include Florida but the death rates don’t.
FWIW, here's Florida's latest report. They're only reporting weekly now, and even then they're only reporting *cases* at the county level, not deaths (though deaths are reported statewide): ww11.doh.state.fl.us/comm/_partners…
Yup, sure enough: Neither Johns Hopkins University nor the NY Times trackers have county-level death data for Florida.
⚠️ UPDATE: Sheesh. I've done the best I can to adjust for Florida only providing county-level data for CASES, not DEATHS:
--New CASE rates are running ~50% higher in red couonties
--New DEATH rates are running ~66% unadjusted for FL but ~74% higher when adjusted for FL.
OK, this should make it easier to follow:
--Case rates don't include Nebraska (unavailable)
--Death rates don't include Nebraska or Florida (unavailable)
--Nearly all of the "missing" deaths are in Florida
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yeah, I’m posting this while waiting for my own COVID test. I’ve been fully vaxxed for a couple months, wear a mask indoors anytime I’m in public etc. but have been feeling crappy the past few days including shortness of breath and general lethargy, so…
One thing which would help is if you didn’t have to fill out the same half-dozen forms EVERY TIME you get tested (this is the 3rd time I’ve done so at the same location each time…the prior cases were required for minor medical procedures).
If it’s positive that means I get to include myself on tomorrow’s “new cases” spreadsheet and scatter plot graph. Great.
I'm seeing a lot of people calling for those who choose not to #GetVaxxed to have higher insurance premiums.
I understand your frustration, but this is explicitly prohibited by the #ACA.
In fact, "community rating" is one of the most popular provisions of the #ACA. 1/
Under the #ACA, health insurance premiums *for the same policy* can only vary based on 3 things: 1. Where you live (rating areas, usually composed of several counties within a state) 2. How old you are (but limited to a 3:1 range) 3. Whether you smoke (up to a 50% surcharge).
Smoking is the ONLY medical/behavorial factor which is insurers can charge more for (and that 50% surcharge doesn't get to take advantage of the financial subsidies either).
Now, perhaps refusing to #GetVaxxed *should* be added as well, but that's a slippery slope scenario. 3/
Recently I looked at 77 counties where <40% of the population was vaccinated & Trump received <40% of the vote...and 4 where >60% were vaxxed & Trump received >60%.
I found a disturbing pattern in the low-vaxx/low-Trump counties.
Today I've updated this, but expanded the range.
Instead of using <40% & >60%, I changed it to <45% & >55% for both vaxx levels & Trump support.
Findings:
--16 million unvaccinated 12yo+ in the Blue Lo-Vax counties
--500K unvaccinated 12yo+ in the Red Hi-Vax counties
--41M unvaccinated 12yo+ in the Red Lo-Vax counties
As I noted the other day: Regardless of WHY the GOP machine has suddenly decided to do a full 180, it's almost certainly too little too late (though it's still a hell of a lot better than not doing it at all, I suppose). Today is July 21st. 1/
Let's assume that it takes a week of this sudden, coordinated effort by the GOP to spur their base into action, and a significant portion gets their first shot next week. Let's call it around July 28th.
That's 3-4 more weeks for Shot #2, or 8/18 or 8/25. 2/
I understand it takes up to 2 more weeks for the vaxx to take full effect. That's 9/01 or 9/08.
I mean yes, absolutely, EVERYONE who can should get vaccinated IMMEDIATELY, but we're talking up to 7 weeks from today. God only knows how bad it'll be by then.
📣 UPDATE: With interest in this having gone viral recently (pun intended), I've decided to post the county-level vaccination graph on a weekly basis.
I've also added a key for the bubbles (population size), and have added county labels for more outliers: acasignups.net/21/07/21/weekl…
ALSO: It turns out those 3 Massachusetts counties (Dukes, Nantucket & Barnstable) aren't done causing headaches after all--there's no way Nantucket can be at 95% vaxxed since *some* young children live there, so until I confirm otherwise I'm assuming that's 95% of 12+ only.
If Nantucket's 95% is 12+ only, that means their total population rate is only around 87%. It also means Dukes & Barnstable are more like 67% & 69% respectively. Today's graph has been updated to reflect this.
They’re both noteworthy accomplishments but I think the rest of us are a little busy battling a global pandemic, dangerous antivaxxers and Nazi coup attempts.
As many have pointed out, they’re not even that significant in terms of technical accomplishment—we were able to land on the moon over 50 years ago using far less advanced technology, while neither of these even made it beyond suborbital. 1/
The ONLY thing which made either flight truly noteworthy is that fact that they were done by private companies, not the government. That has major implications for the future of space flight and exploration, of course, but it’s not necessarily something to celebrate.