Ever wonder how eugenics gained hegemony in 20th century Germany? THIS is how. Over 100 million people in the US have 1 or more chronic illnesses. Amazing people think they have a right to shame others for deciding against a medical treatment. Also, Darwin was a eugenicist.
"Eugenicists felt that they were able to justify prejudiced and immoral actions under Darwin’s theories (Wiker, 2000). The segregation, sterilization, and murder of various groups was justified by some as being done for the greater good of evolution..."
"...- those groups were considered to be ‘less fit’, and by preventing their reproduction, advocates argued that the human race would improve and evolve into a better species..."
"...The theory of evolution helped support explanations that defended these actions as necessary to ensure that human progress continued (Wiker, 2000)..."
"...The most well-known consequences of this line of thinking were in Nazi Germany, when Russians, Jews, and those with mental or physical disabilities (among other groups) were sterilized, imprisoned and murdered..."
"...Less broadly, Charles Darwin was a direct influence on his cousin Sir Francis Galton (Gillham, 2009). Galton coined the term eugenics, and is considered by some to be the father of eugenics (Galton, 1883)..."
"...He was inspired by Darwin’s Origin of Species and tried to establish that intelligence and talent were hereditary. (Gillham, 2009). Other members of Darwin’s family were involved in the eugenics movement as well..."
"...One of his sons, Leonard, was the president of the first International Congress of Eugenics (Wiker, 2000). Another son, George, promoted birth control among the lower classes and simplifying divorces in order to limit the reproduction of the so-called unfit."
Can we just put assholes on notice and remind them that we've been here before once already?
This is exhausting. I'm spent.
How can people be so selfish and stupid to think they can control the lives of others and then expect them to welcome THEIR stupidity?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Many embedded research studies are granted a waiver of consent from patients, with the requirement that personal health information be protected from disclosure."
This means embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) via NIH don't need patient consent.
There are NIH ePCTs taking place in regard to pain and (conflating) addiction. There is also medication sparing programs for post-operative patients and for chronic pain through the HEAL initiative.
The Pragmatic and Implementation Studies for the Management of Pain to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (PRISM) is the main ePCT taking place via the HEAL initiative. Meaning, patients are studied within the delivery model (EHR) and consent requirements likely waived via data protection
This study could benefit people with #ChronicPain by helping round out the science for the safety/efficacy of LTOT. This could influence future research trajectories based on patient reports. See thread.
Some raised concerns that we don't know what the results will be, but that's how science is supposed to work. If people knew what the results would be, there'd be no reason to study. Because millions have likely been force-tapered, this could contribute to an end to the practice.
The ethical issues surrounding forced tapering stand on their own. However, having science that proves opioids aren't as dangerous or inappropriate for chronic "non-cancer pain" as some claim is also important because public policy is informed by it, whether we like it or not.
Kognito simulations "allows PCPs to learn through role-play conversations with emotionally responsive virtual patients how to build trust, collaborate on a treatment plan, and address the patient's request for antibiotics." Except for this pitch, it'd be simulations for #opioids.
Also from LinkedIn: "Ron was the Co-Founder, CEO, and Chief Simulation Strategist of Kognito, a virtual human health simulation company acquired by Blackstone Private Equity."
Blackstone Private Equity: "As of 2020, the company's total assets under management were approximately US$619 billion."
"We located 1,449 pages of responsive records and two Excel workbooks (108 pages released in full; 103
pages disclosed in part; 1,238 pages withheld in full). After a careful review ... some information was withheld from release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552 Exemptions b5 and b6."
"EXEMPTION 5
Exemption 5 protects inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be
available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency. Exemption 5 therefore
incorporates the privileges that protect materials from discovery ...
You know what? I DID ALMOST DIE. Everything is NOT fine. I still cant get essentials for my family. I am still in shock and trying to process what we are STILL going through. Dont DM my FRIENDS to talk shit about me. More than just meds went wrong, EVERYTHING DID. #Austin
I havent had much of a chance to write anything about it yet because I'm STILL IN THE MIDST OF AN EMERGENCY and I'm still processing all of this. I also havent taken charity so I dont see HOW you think you're entitled to tell me how I should or shouldnt respond.
Are we seeing a version of Milgram's experiment play out on patients because "experts," who never treat physical injuries or illnesses, told our government that it's almost never appropriate to relieve pain with medicine? Do we blindly follow "experts"?
Do we blindly follow them even when they provide absolutely no scientific evidence? All signs point to yes. We saw addiction psychiatrists with fringe views attempt to convince the FDA to implement dosage caps for medicines but they failed to provide evidence & were refused.
It appears they were attempting to use a government agency to implement a policy that wasn't supported by evidence. The group didn't give up. They subsequently got involved with a CDC workgroup on the development of a "guideline" for prescribing pain medicines.