ah yes, the most white, male, Christian reaction in the world
if someone says I said something antisemitic/sexist/racist, etc. instead of doing any self-examination I'm going to freak out and accuse them of being in bad faith
literally nothing is going to change for the better unless people with privilege:
1) understand that having your behavior called racist/sexist/antisemitic/etc. is not somehow worse than BEING that thing
2) learn to sit with the discomfort hearing that causes
like, so someone says a thing you said was racist/sexist/etc.
STOP PANICKING
you're not going to die, you're not fucking "cancelled" or whatever
take a deep breath
first, someone saying, hey, that thing you said was kind of racist/sexist/etc. is not the same as saying that the sum total of who you are is A MUSTACHE-TWIRLING BIGOT
second, racism and sexism and all kinds of other -isms are baked into the society we live in, so yeah, it's very possible you said a thing that made some bad assumptions
it's okay to not be an expert on all of them
hell, I don't even know EVERY antisemitic dogwhistle
so instead of freaking out at the person who pointed it out, take a deep breath, remember that you won't fucking DIE just because you said something problematic, and learn from the moment
because the way so many of us react in the moment, from a place of panic, means that we end up making the person who pointed it out handle our emotions
and that, friends, is some bullshit
especially when that person is marginalized
you don't make someone you harmed then deal with your guilt about having harmed them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another big part of why Christian atheists have trouble seeing how Christian they still are is that Christianity advertises itself as being modular, which is not how belief systems have worked for most of human history. (1/x)
So a selling point of Christianity has always been the idea that it's plug-and-play: you don't have to stop being Irish or Korean or Nigerian to be Christian, you don't have to learn a new language, you keep your culture and just also be Christian.
Evangelicals in particular love to contrast this to Islam, to the idea that you have to learn Arabic and adopt elements of Arab culture to be Muslim, which helps fuel the image of Islam as a Foreign Ideology that's taking over the West.
Less obvious baked-in societal Christian attitudes revolve around forgiveness, how to handle wrongdoing, the existence of evil, etc.
@science_gamer@whatanerd@unclefeezus Hell, someone just did a great thread on how the difference between Stephen King’s and Stanley Kubrick’s versions of the Shining is the difference between Christian and Jewish concepts of evil.
@science_gamer@whatanerd@unclefeezus We have different ethics (Jewish values strongly lean communitarian; Protestants are individualistic, Catholics tend toward the middle). Christian thought tends to be suspicious of ambiguity; Jewish though tends to be suspicious of certainty.
Christian atheists object to being identified as having come from Christian backgrounds for the same reason men object if you start putting “male” in front of words like “doctor.”
A big part of power and privilege is the invisibility of belonging to a specific group, because it positions you as the unquestioned (and therefore justified) default. It means that your perspective is objective, unlike those agenda-driven marginalized people.
And all of that protects the status quo. Any marginalized person who wants to change it is self-interested and agenda-driven.
But the fact that you are NOT neutral in your pushback, that your self-interested agenda is trying to preserve the status quo, is occluded.
I have watched and listened to a bunch of commentary on the Shining (most recently on @youaregoodpod) and people keep talking about how the movie makes Jack unsympathetic and, like, yes? The book & movie form a Rashomon of POV from abuser & abused.
Like, I feel like @Remember_Sarah came closer than anyone I've ever heard talk about it on a podcast or documentary or whatever when she noted that the movie feels like a companion piece to the book or a commentary on it rather than an adaptation, but still didn't quite go there.
Like, of COURSE in the book Jack and Wendy actually seem to have some affection for each other, whereas in the movie, they don't.
For Jack, who doesn't WANT to be an abusive husband, he can still love Wendy and remember why they're together.
Organized Christian Zionism started with Luther and Calvin in the 1500s. When Jews wouldn't convert to their brands of Christianity, they were like "send them back to Israel so they can die in the End Times."
Organized Jewish Zionism didn't get off the ground until 1700s.
The Puritans, who were awful in every possible way, were super-into this idea, btw.
But yeah, the footnotes to the Geneva Bible (1560s-1570s) were pushing the idea of the End Times as centered on Palestine and that the Jews needed to be sent back there for it to happen.
Other churches that were big proponents of it included the Moravians, the Methodists, and the British Baptists.