I’m sure you’ve heard plenty of alarms about invasive species, maybe even about specific invasive species in your area. But I bet no one has taken the time to explain what it means for a species to be “invasive”. 🧵
To understand what makes a species "invasive", we must first understand the opposite. This is usually described as what makes a species "native", but as this term is co-opted from indigenous people, I will use the term "endemic" for this thread.
What makes a species "endemic" is that this species has existed in a specific area for a long period of time. How long? Well, that depends.
In order for a species to be endemic, a species must have existed in an area for long enough that other species in the area have adapted to their presence.
To explain this concept, let's look at a hypothetical example. Let's say there's an ecosystem of rabbits and hawks. The rabbits eat plants, and the hawks eat rabbits. So the rabbits must reproduce at a high enough rate to replace the rabbits that get eaten.
But let's say that foxes move into the area! Then the rabbits have to deal with being preyed upon by both hawks AND foxes.
The foxes would be considered endemic to the area when enough time has passed that the rabbits have evolved or adapted to have a stable population again.
Until that point, the foxes would be considered a foreign species, and not endemic to that region. In the meantime, this would also pose a serious threat to the rabbit population in that area.
If they couldn't adapt fast enough, the combined pressure of the foxes and hawks might eat all the rabbits, and prevent them from existing in this area. This is one way in which invasive species can cause problems for endemic species.
Another way can be through competition for food. In our rabbit example, let's say instead of foxes moving into the area, that mice do. If the mice were to become populous enough, they would be in direct competition with the rabbits for a limited food supply.
If the mice are more successful at reproducing more quickly, or accessing the food more successfully, they may outcompete all the rabbits in the area and eventually replace them.
This causes problems for the entire ecosystem. Remember our hawks from earlier? If they evolved specifically to hunt rabbits, they are going to have a much more difficult time hunting mice. If they cannot adapt to this change in the ecosystem, their population may also collapse.
The basic premise of why invasive species are a threat is this; organisms are not interchangeable, and all ecosystems are very delicate balances that have been honed over millennia. Even a slight destabilization of one species can have catastrophic consequences.
Not every foreign species in an area is going to be invasive. What makes a species specifically invasive is this; if it is more successful at finding food, surviving or reproducing than an endemic species.
Keep this in mind as well, many foreign species have unfair advantages compared to endemic species. Predators may not prey on foreign species as easily as on endemic species, and prey species may not be as successful at avoiding predation by foreign species.
When species have coexisted in a specific region for a long period of time, they often adapt to specifically occupy different "niches". This means they adapt to have different food, shelter and reproductive strategies so they do not need to compete with other species in the area.
For an example of this, let's go back to our rabbits. Rabbits nest in burrows that they dig into the ground. Squirrels, which often share areas with rabbits, nest in holes in trees. The hawks we mentioned before nest in the branches of trees.
By having different nesting environments, they can all successfully nest in the same area without having to fight over a more limited number of suitable locations. The same principle applies to food sources, micro-habitats, and much, much more.
The longer an ecosystem has gone without being disturbed, the more species in it have found very specific niches to occupy, and often the more species it can support. This principle is why a greater variety of species exist in regions that have been undisturbed longer.
One trait that nearly all invasive species possess is that of being generalists. A generalist is a species that is very versatile in the food sources it can utilize, the places it can reproduce, and the habitats it can occupy successfully.
So, when moving into a new environment, generalist species are much more likely to thrive, and displace existing populations.
Invasive species in general also reproduce quickly, allowing them to disrupt the existing balance even more rapidly.
So what can we do about invasive species? Well, the number one strategy to managing invasive species is to prevent them from invading in the first place. Invasive species are introduced to new environments by human activities, and human carelessness.
Firstly, never ever release pets into the wild. This includes everything from cats to snakes to hermit crabs to goldfish. These species can be catastrophic when introduced to environments where they are often invasive and highly successful at displacing endemic species.
Secondly, be mindful of hitchhiking species! If you are travelling between habitats, make sure to prevent species travelling with you. This can be everything from plants to larva that can live in water bodies to rats on ships and more. Think about who is travelling with you!
Thirdly, be very careful about ornamental and houseplants! While keeping plants is a lovely hobby, it is important to make sure that kept plants cannot reproduce uncontrolled in the wild. Keep any outdoor plants in safe pots and plant endemic plants whenever possible!
Fourthly, learn and pay attention to what species are invasive in your area! And if you see them, kill them if at all possible. It may seem harsh, but invasive species have the potential to destabilize and wipe out whole ecosystems without intervention!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex (he/him) is fighting for trans kids ⚧🏳️‍⚧️

Alex (he/him) is fighting for trans kids ⚧🏳️‍⚧️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexPetrovnia

26 Jul
The wedding industry is so cisheteronormative that a caterer I reached out to just replied to me and called me “Alexandra”. My full name is on the message.
I have my full name, Alexander, listed because when I went by Alex on the site every vendor assumed I was a woman, because heaven forbid a MAN have any investment in his own wedding!
And then I get to correct them when they assume I’m marrying a woman. Once they meet us, I can watch them calculating which is “really the woman” in the relationship. They usually decide it’s me bc I’m friendlier/more talkative with strangers and I handle the communications.
Read 6 tweets
26 Jul
If your “advocacy” for trans men involves competing with, ostracizing or further marginalizing trans women, it’s not advocacy, it’s transmisogyny.
And yes, it is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE to advocate for trans men and transmasculine people without doing this. In fact, it’s absolutely integral, because the oppressive forces that marginalize trans women marginalize trans men, and vice versa.
Transmasculine oppression and transfeminine oppression are two sides of the same coin. It is only by acknowledging these perpendicular axis of oppression that we can understand the necessary solidarity that will get us through.

link.medium.com/yaSIuR2Vcib
Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
Hey researchers, listen up!
Here’s a crash course thread on writing gender questions from a trans person who has designed surveys before.
We criticize this a lot, but rarely do we show what is correct, so in this thread I’ll do my best to do that. 🧵
Firstly, do you want to ask your research question about sex, or about gender, or about something else entirely? The best advice I can give is this: be specific.
If you’re asking questions about uterine health, ask if your participant has a uterus, not for their gender. If you’re researching gender bias, ask about gender. If you simply need sex statistics, ask about sex.
Think critically about what information you want.
Read 13 tweets
19 Jul
If you consider yourself a radical or an opponent of colonialism or United States’ ongoing imperialism, stop financially supporting Marvel.
Firstly, I'll say this; all media is propaganda. Every piece of media is made with purpose, and without critically thinking about what that purpose is, and who it benefits, we as consumers are being influenced.
So let's ask the question; why was Marvel created? Or, let's go even further back, and ask, why were comics created?
Read 40 tweets
16 Jul
My thread recently made it to the front page of Twitter, and had nothing to do with my transness. I had the same experience.
@Twitter @TwitterSupport Is hate against trans people ever ruled a violation against your policies? Or are you perfectly content to profiteer off of trans creators while not even doing the barest amount to protect us from abuse?
My inbox this morning was full of accusations about my mental state, accusations that I was a child abuser, and more. I reported these messages.
Every. Single. One. Was ruled not in violation of your policies.
Why are trans people not a protected group? @Twitter
Read 5 tweets
16 Jul
Hello everyone! 👋 There are a LOT of you who are new, so I wanted to take a few minutes to introduce myself! Here's a brief thread on me and what content you can expect to find here. 🧵
Firstly! I'm not actually a geologist!
I do love geology dearly and studied it for a while, but my professional/scientific expertise is in the intersections between environmental equity, freshwater ecology, environmental management, hydrology and public health.
Put simply, my scientific mission is this; to keep shit (sometimes literal) out of your drinking water.
This field means that I dabble in a lot of sub-fields that are tangentially related, and have a decent understanding of a wide range of scientific disciplines!
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(