This is a disingenuous claim. Cases in England peaked a few days BEFORE the last stage of opening, and mobility data shows the biggest changes in people's behaviour came after Step 2 in April and Step 3 in May, since when average cases rose from under 2,000 to over 40,000 a day.
Visits to Retail & Recreation (covering everything from restaurants and non-essential shops to museums and theme parks) rose after Step 2 in April, as shops reopened and outdoor hospitality returned.
And again after Step 3 in May, when indoor entertainment reopened.
Usage of public transport follows a similar pattern - a rise at Step 2 in mid-April and another smaller, slower rise after Step 3 in mid-May.
As with recreation, there's little or no immediate change visible in people's behaviour in the first few days after Step 4 on July 19th.
And visits to workplaces actually FELL over the last month, as case numbers surged and (in the most recent week we have data for) over a million people were told to self-isolate by Test & Trace or the NHS Covid App.
Meanwhile about one in six secondary school children and one in eight primary school children have been at home due to covid outbreaks as the school year limps to an end.
This in turn seems to have caused a big drop in regular lateral flow testing.
So the recent drop in cases is obviously good news, but the idea that it has anything to do with lifting restrictions .. 4 days later is clearly nonsense.
And the last stage of reopening in May let Delta run wild, resulting in 1,000,000 more cases and 1,000 more deaths, so far.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is quite an exposé of HART, who try to look respectable in public but behind closed doors are working with cranks like Michael Yeadon and Anna Rayner, seriously discussing crazy conspiracy theories, and describing MPs they were lobbying as "lemmings" and "not too bright"! 😆
In one exchange, HART member Liz Evans says she doesn't want to "sound like a conspiracy theorist", but she believes the government is "very happy as things are" because it has "nefarious plans" to use covid to further some "malign agenda".
Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me!
Elsewhere members discuss recruiting a Swiss cardiologist / serial conspiracy theorist who had been sectioned over mental health concerns.
They were worried about how it would look but admitted "some of us may have those views as well", apparently referring to the "Great Reset".
Whether this means the daily case count "seriously understates" infections seems doubtful though.
An ONS study shows (up to June 5th) less than 1% of participants had been reinfected. Most cases detected at a high Ct, suggesting fairly mild infections.
Of course, this data is from before the current surge in cases.
But even with 3.7 million people who first tested positive for covid over 6 months ago, it's unlikely that any reinfections would make a significant difference to the 1 million new cases counted in the last month.
"At the Nuremberg Trials the doctors and nurses stood trial. And they hung. If you're a doctor or a nurse, get off that bus."
Just a normal day for conspiracy nut Kate Shemirani, as a crowd of anti-vaxxers cheers her comparison of hardworking NHS staff to Nazi war criminals. 😳
That's because hospitals routinely screen all admissions for covid, whereas patients (mostly infants) are only tested for RSV if a doctor specifically asks for it.
Hardly surprising then that positivity is much higher for RSV tests than for covid tests.
In fact, the Herald article he links to clearly says that only 40% of recent hospital admissions were over 60. Did he even read it?
His entire "essay" is based on a lie. And @toadmeister published this blatant misinformation, because he either didn't notice or didn't care.
As if that's not bad enough, the writer then plots all hospital patients vs test positivity in over 60s (conjured up using unspecified "statistical tricks").
Which is even more meaningless.
Based on this utter gibberish he falsely claims that the vaccines aren't working.