Whether this means the daily case count "seriously understates" infections seems doubtful though.
An ONS study shows (up to June 5th) less than 1% of participants had been reinfected. Most cases detected at a high Ct, suggesting fairly mild infections.
Of course, this data is from before the current surge in cases.
But even with 3.7 million people who first tested positive for covid over 6 months ago, it's unlikely that any reinfections would make a significant difference to the 1 million new cases counted in the last month.
Indeed, PHE now publish data for reinfections on a monthly basis in their Flu & Covid Surveillance Report. h/t @RP131
As of July 4th there were only 23,000 possible reinfections detected to date (defined as testing positive at least 90 days apart).
"At the Nuremberg Trials the doctors and nurses stood trial. And they hung. If you're a doctor or a nurse, get off that bus."
Just a normal day for conspiracy nut Kate Shemirani, as a crowd of anti-vaxxers cheers her comparison of hardworking NHS staff to Nazi war criminals. 😳
That's because hospitals routinely screen all admissions for covid, whereas patients (mostly infants) are only tested for RSV if a doctor specifically asks for it.
Hardly surprising then that positivity is much higher for RSV tests than for covid tests.
In fact, the Herald article he links to clearly says that only 40% of recent hospital admissions were over 60. Did he even read it?
His entire "essay" is based on a lie. And @toadmeister published this blatant misinformation, because he either didn't notice or didn't care.
As if that's not bad enough, the writer then plots all hospital patients vs test positivity in over 60s (conjured up using unspecified "statistical tricks").
Which is even more meaningless.
Based on this utter gibberish he falsely claims that the vaccines aren't working.
90%+ intention to get vaccinated in 18-25 age groups.
So what's going on? 🤔
Meanwhile the government is denying renewed reports of a shortage of the Pfizer vaccine.
Maybe they aren't being entirely honest? It would certainly explain the slow progress in vaccinating under 40s, as AstraZeneca isn't used in those age groups.