I have a bit of feelings about all the “first trans Olympian” stories across my Facebook feeds, and then none of them being about trans women—despite trans women being the ones beset with controversy in terms of sports inclusion.
It’s great and all to see trans people there it’s just that… y’know?
There is coverage of Laurel Hubbard but most of it is mainstream publications feeding the controversy rather than queer & feminist pubs talking about how inspiring she is and how it’s proof of the world progressing.
And it sure makes me wonder what it means that queer & feminist publications are praising AFAB non-binary representation but seem to have little of the same energy for trans women actually fighting against a tsunami of policies and organized movements against their presence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Charles Moser has shown, around 93% of cisgender women report occasional "erotic arousal to the thought or image of oneself as a woman", and 28% commonly so. If anything so-called 'autogynephilia' is merely a regular feature of female sexuality.
Of the cisgender women in the study, 90% were straight. This reported 28% is largely in line with the 10 to 36% rate of 'femininity self-arousal' among straight trans women.
The overlap is large! A 2008 study by Veale, Clarke & Lorax reaches similar results, giving us this overlap in 'core autogynephilia score'. Trans women and straight cis women are pretty darn similar!
Is the social and financial capital you’re acquiring make you feel better about being a hypocrite complicit in th… — Not at all. But I feel worse about my complicity in settler law separate from its carceral aspects, as most of my… curiouscat.qa/ButNotTheCity/…
I have complex but ultimately deeply ambivalent feelings about the law and being in the field. Perhaps one of the reasons why so much of my work ends up being in bioethics and trans health instead. I’m constantly asking myself if being here is making things worse or better.
I doubt I would be in law had I transitioned before university. I finished my degree because I was most of the way through. And I enjoy, from a strategic standpoint, the ability to be taken more seriously when I say law is oppressive bullshit—which comes with the degree.
I am a jurist and bioethicist. I served as the first openly transfeminine clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada, coined the term “gender modality”, and am famously horny on main. I am also inebriated on a weekday evening. Ask Me Anything!
Linkin Park’s first two albums (three if you count Reanimation) are amazing and I will not let anyone convince me otherwise.
Do you have an ethical and legal right not to engage in sexual acts you don't want? Absolute-fucking-ly. But that's very different from a broad, abstract right to know whether people are trans.
Trans Twitter, can you be a good ally to trans communities while still publicly expressing love for Harry Potter and partaking in the fandom?
And does your answer change if you know that JK Rowling claimed that her fans are a silent majority of transphobes who agree with her, using them as support for her position?
If anyone cares about my views, I’m tending towards no. You obviously can actually love it—that’s all fine. My concerns start with publicly professing love and engaging in fandoms, because that’s where it starts breathing life into her cultural power and transphobia.