The world’s most sophisticated commercially available spyware may be being abused, according to a journalistic investigation: Pegasus, has been used to target & spy on human rights activists, investigative journalists, politicians & academics.
Pegasus is the most advanced spyware on the market. It can infiltrate victims’ devices without their even having to click a malicious link – a so-called “zero-click attack”.
Once inside, the power Pegasus possesses to transform a phone into a surveillance beacon is astounding.
It immediately copies messages, pictures, videos & downloaded content to send to the attacker. It also records calls, tracks a target’s location while independently & secretly activating a phone’s camera and microphone: an infected phone acts like a permanent fly on the wall.
The Pegasus revelations show that sophisticated spyware tools are sold on an open market: an industry of for-profit malware developers creating & selling the same types of tools – & sometimes these tools are used by “bad hackers” to bring businesses & Govts to their knees.
In the wake of the Pegasus revelations, Edward Snowden has called for an international spyware ban, stating that we’re moving towards a world where no device is safe.
Without transparency, we have no sense of how & under what circumstances Pegasus is licensed, who has authorisation to use Pegasus once it’s licensed, under what circumstances a license may be revoked, or what international regulations are in place to police against its abuse.
Pegasus has been misused. Greater accountability & oversight is needed. How do we regulate & introduce enforceable controls on the creation & sale of corporate spyware? Without this, the threats that Pegasus and future spyware tools pose will be a threat to all of us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My best bet as to why people actually believe this unhinged bollocks is a mix of individual psychological trauma, combined with absence of critical thinking skills & pernicious propagation of conspiracy theories on multiple platforms, given credence by professional shit-stirrers.
Jesus wept.
Hundreds of thousands of British people are being radicalised by widespread misinformation & disinformation about #COVID19. It's getting scary. The reasons are complex, & absence of concern suggests our Govt welcomes it. We urgently need to find solutions.
The "Yellow Peril" is a racist metaphor that represents East Asian people as an existential danger to 'the West'.
When challenged, supposedly erudite Jacob Rees-Mogg said “I don’t actually know what term I used that was offensive, so if out of ignorance I have, I apologise.”
Jacob Rees-Mogg is an existential danger to Britain.
Here's a selection of tweets about his extremely concerning behaviour:
Just ten men, almost all Brextremists, have made a fifth of all major political donations from individuals in the UK in the past 20 years, giving £106 MILLION to political parties & campaigns.
All have given money to the Conservative Party at some point.
Almost all the top ten donors are Brexiteers and have donated £27m between them to Eurosceptic causes.
Of this, nearly half comes from Christopher Harborne, linked to many offshore companies, a businessman who has donated £13million to Nigel Farage’s Reform Party since 2019.
Billionaire Peter Hargreaves gave £3.2m to the Brexit campaign group Leave. EU.
In February, following Sunak's hint about corporation tax rises, he said: "The best Governments get out of the way of business. Government spending is inefficient & abused by unworthy recipients."
Marcus represents the very best of British. The @spectator, GB "News", much of the press & the Govt represent the very worst. They fear successful, decent, honest & altruistic role models - it's completely alien to them that people choose to help others, rather than themselves.
Yesterday 96 more lives were needlessly lost, today we're told UK journalists could face prison sentences of up to 14 years for stories that 'embarrass the Govt', & tonight @BBCNews went full Farage about migrants crossing the channel.
"Calling it #FreedomDay attempts to nullify the public by encouraging us not to scrutinise government & media performance as we should. It reflects an attempt to move the discussion from science, sociology & public health to patriotism & emancipation."
The most effective propaganda is that which creates emotional bonds between the target audience & certain people, products, events or concepts. The powerful want us to think in certain ways about #FreedomDay & to exclude/overlook aspects of the pandemic that it deems undesirable.
From the propagandist’s point of view though, “freedom” is an effective rhetorical tool because it means whatever the target audience wants it to mean.
Its utility is that the term 'freedom' is vague, but it always resonates with ease when uttered.
Twitter trolls know that racist/hateful content about a high profile event will be widely condemned online. But condemnation serves to further magnify the impact of these posts: positive message will be overshadowed by discussions of hateful/racist posts.
What is surprising is that @Twitter allows the process to continue. There is no ambiguity about these outcomes, only variability in the scale. Twitter has archives of online firestorms in many contexts & is aware of the conditions, characteristics & outcomes of these occurrences.
Based on this knowledge, the rapid immediate cascades that result in the predictable cycle of hateful content and condemnation could be minimised using tools Twitter have already developed, such as prompting users to rethink their tweets that may include harmful language.