X : Have you seen the culture map?
Me : Which one?
X : This one.
Me : Ah ...
Me : Which one?
X : This one.
Me : Ah ...
X : Ah?
Me : Well, I like relative comparisons but it's not a "map", it's not even a "graph" (in which the connection between nodes has meaning). It's a collection of sliders, best seen like this ...
Me : Well, I like relative comparisons but it's not a "map", it's not even a "graph" (in which the connection between nodes has meaning). It's a collection of sliders, best seen like this ...
... that doesn't mean it's not useful, I think it's a fascinating way of discussing certain issues. However, my interest is in maps.
X : So, you don't like the use of the term 'map' in 'culture map'?
Me : Actually, I'm not particularly keen on the use of the term 'culture' being that behaviour is just one aspect of culture. However, it's all fascinating stuff in one way or another.
Me : Actually, I'm not particularly keen on the use of the term 'culture' being that behaviour is just one aspect of culture. However, it's all fascinating stuff in one way or another.
X : So, it's not useful?
Me : I didn't say that. I think it's fascinating but my interest is in maps.
X : Can you do relative comparisons in maps?
Me : You can compare to another, in fact we do this everytime we run pre-mortem and then post-mortem with a map.
Me : I didn't say that. I think it's fascinating but my interest is in maps.
X : Can you do relative comparisons in maps?
Me : You can compare to another, in fact we do this everytime we run pre-mortem and then post-mortem with a map.
X : So, you think it is useful?
Me : It is fascinating and anything which helps in discussion is always a positive in my view. I do also like relative comparison i.e. population studies. At least it gets the discussion out of the world of stories. I'm just not keen on the title.
Me : It is fascinating and anything which helps in discussion is always a positive in my view. I do also like relative comparison i.e. population studies. At least it gets the discussion out of the world of stories. I'm just not keen on the title.
X : Why don't you have value chain on that map?
Me : Too many people started thinking of the value chain as some sort of defined axis rather than realising that it was scaffolding for a partially ordered list. I can put in back if it helps you but I'll keep it dotted.
Me : Too many people started thinking of the value chain as some sort of defined axis rather than realising that it was scaffolding for a partially ordered list. I can put in back if it helps you but I'll keep it dotted.
X : Why is ...
Me : ... this above that?
X : Yes.
Me : It's a chain of needs and as such it has perspective which depends upoin the anchors you use - in my case "We" and "Me". It's also a map which by its very nature is imperfect and invites challenge and discussion.
Me : ... this above that?
X : Yes.
Me : It's a chain of needs and as such it has perspective which depends upoin the anchors you use - in my case "We" and "Me". It's also a map which by its very nature is imperfect and invites challenge and discussion.
X : now I can see that Heroes are 3 times less valuable than Memory
Me : It's exactly those attempt to create a defined axis rather than realising it's a partially ordered list which made me remove the scaffolding in the first place. I'll put it back but make it dotted.
Me : It's exactly those attempt to create a defined axis rather than realising it's a partially ordered list which made me remove the scaffolding in the first place. I'll put it back but make it dotted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
