X : Thought on John Lewis getting into rental properties?
Me : You mean this - theguardian.com/business/2021/… ... very timely, very smart.
X : Really, rental?
Me : No, think of it like John Lewis Kitchens, John Lewis Bathrooms, John Lewis Decorating, John Lewis Roof Extensions ...
X : You are kidding?
Me : Nope. There's a huge market for a trusted name to come into the home improvement space. Not just selling supplies but project management. The market is screaming for it. This is a good move by John Lewis, focused on the users, adapting with the times.
Me : The whole building 10,000 rental properties should be seen as cover for building up the capabilities, networks, supply chains and testing environment to launch a nationwide home improvement service. I assume this is what John Lewis is upto. It's on the ball.
X : John Lewis loft conversions?
Me : Yep. John Lewis property extentions, hell ... even John Lewis homes built to order. It needs that trusted brand, they have it, they can play to it. This is a bold gutsy move ... I do like it. Rental? That's missing the bigger picture.
X : John Lewis Plumbing?
Me : No, you're missing the whole "project" aspect and getting into the weeds. Users don't want plumbing except in an emergency (and there is plenty of that) ... what they want is a new bathroom, a new loft conversion, a new etc.
X : What if John Lewis aren't doing this?
Me : Do you mean, what if John Lewis is simply building some properties to rent?
X : Yes
Me : That would be a wasted opportunity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“lack of progress” since November 2019 as “frustrating and scary” ... hmmm, I think the lack of progress since November 1989 when Mr David Tripper called it an "issue of vital concern" has been frustrating and scary - climatenorthernireland.org/news/climate-e…
To be blunt, climate change policy can be aptly described as 30 years of relative inaction, dithering and fiddling whilst producing oodles of hot air.
X : I don't see you being active in the field?
Me : I used to be. Back in the early 90s when we had a chance to mitigate.
X : Why did you stop?
Me : It became obvious back then that we wouldn't mitigate or take serious action until the effects overwhelmed us ...
X : Is bitcoin a ponzi scheme?
Me : No. It's far more malicious than that - blog.gardeviance.org/2013/11/a-spoi… ... however, there is some good stuff going on in the crypto currency community.
X : Do you think UK Gov should be involved.
Me : I think UK should be involved in building huge crypto mining facilities built on renewable energy and local grown tech. Its growth should be funded by those mining operation.
X : UK adopt bitoin?
Me : Oh, no ...
Me : At the same time as building mining facilities it should severely limit the internal use (UK) of bitcoin. The goal is to get the mining to pay for renewable capability and local tech. At some point you switch off mining. You want others adopting bitoin, not yourself.
X : Have you seen the culture map?
Me : Which one?
X : This one.
Me : Ah ...
X : Ah?
Me : Well, I like relative comparisons but it's not a "map", it's not even a "graph" (in which the connection between nodes has meaning). It's a collection of sliders, best seen like this ...
... that doesn't mean it's not useful, I think it's a fascinating way of discussing certain issues. However, my interest is in maps.
X : How do you value people?
Me : That's an odd question. People aren't resources.
X : But we talk about them as assets.
Me : Them? Gosh, this all feels uncomfortable.
X : But how would you value?
Me : hmmm ...
... it depends upon what your society values, more "Me" or "We" or a bit of both.
X : Explain.
Me : You have "Me" values such as salary, possessions, knowledge, expertise etc. Then you have"We" values such as giving back to society, enabling others.
X : How can you value then?
Me : If you're thinking assets then people die. So, the "Me" always reduces to zero. However the "We" value can continue for much longer, they can become embedded in the memory of the collective itself through symbols (like statues) or heroes of some story.
Me : Oh. Social stuff will happen, kicking off around 2025-2030 and ongoing to 2040.
X : What stuff?
Me : There are couple of different paths, anyway that's from a time ago.
X : You're not answering.
Me : I know. But we will see soon enough.
X : Still not any clearer. Perhaps put your predictions in escrow?
Me : No interest. I've even removed it from the heatmap and I don't make any claim other than it was a mistake to include it in the first place. On the upside it got me thinking more about culture and society ...
Setting up 365, need to integrate google calendar and ... read only. Are you effing kidding me, this is 2021. Ok, well at least I can have an integrated mailbox ... oh wait, no? I need to create search function or script. Jesus ... this is just a turd.
Oh, I can use Google Workspace Sync for Microsoft Outlook (GWSMO) if I'm a G-Sync user ... I wonder when they forget the bit about focusing on user needs and replaced it with focusing on business needs. Gosh, I wish Amazon did email and calendars. That would actually work.
Sorry G-Suite not G-Sync ... any suggestions on good packages out there which integrate Google / Mac / Outlook together in a sensible way with 2 way sync across multiple devices or is that something which doesn't exist in practical terms?