True. We didn't have that before 25 July and I'm afraid we won't have an independent judiciary any time soon. Nobody made any serious efforts to reform the judiciary after the 2011 revolution. Instead, political parties co-opted the most corrupt judges and empowered them.
Nidaa Tounes, Ennahdha, Tahya Tounes etc all had their networks of corrupt judges covering up the crimes of these political parties' leaders, which ranged from financial crimes to collusion with terrorist organisations. It was in nobody's interests to clean up the judiciary.
They picked the most corrupt judges from the old regime, and blackmailed them into submission on the basis of "kompromat". There has been no such thing as a fair trial in Tunisia. Not before 2011, not after. Any ordinary citizen who's faced the justice system knows that.
This, combined with the absolute lack of any serious security sector reform, largely explains why so many citizens believe that the democracy political parties are talking about is a sham, a fantasy. How can you expect a people to be attached to a purportedly democratic regime
when the only thing that's democratic about it is elections... but where the citizenry is divided into two classes: the politicians, the judges, and the cops who are all above the law and enjoy total impunity, and the rest who are being crushed on a daily basis.
I sadly don't expect much resistance from the ordinary citizen to an authoritarian drift today, simply because they did not experience "the democratic transition" the same way the winners - again, cops, judges, politicians - did.
The ordinary citizen who knows how corrupt the judiciary is and how useless it is to file any legal complaint isn't fooled by the politicians' discourse when any suspicious affair is revealed: "We are confident in the integrity and the independence of the justice system"
There have been enough scandals and instances of abuse to shake empires in the last 10 years in Tunisia. But nobody can name one instance in which justice was indeed served. Puts some perspective on what this pseudo-democracy is worth to ordinary people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What happened in Tunisia is a coup insofar as it's an evidently unconstitutional - allegedly temporary but don't be naive - power grab. Unconstitutional primarily because Saied used Article 80 to suspended parliamentary activity for 30 days, while this article states that
parliament must be in permanent session. I cannot find any plausible interpretation that would validate the idea that parliament can be suspended and at the same time in permanent session. Saied is known for very loosely interpreting the law and the Constitution.
He can come up with compelling explanations that would persuade most laypeople but wouldn't fool any serious jurist.
But this isn't your grandpa's kind of coups. Didn't close the borders, didn't arrest political opponents who represent a threat to his scheme, and national
I just wish those who are - rightfully - pointing out that the President's decision is unconstitutional had actually respected the constitution they wrote. The Constitution required that they establish a Constitutional Court by May 2016.
But political parties, chiefly Ennahdha and Nidaa Tounes, deliberately obstructed the creation of the Constitutional Court, and thus the democratic transition. What happened yesterday was a constitutional coup. But the original coup was the failure to set up the Constitutional
Court in May 2016 which normalised disregard for the Constitution. Now we are in July 2021 and the only thing that could have prevented the current situation was, ironically, the existence of a Constitutional Court.
Comment trouver des infos fiables sur le #Coronavirus ?
1/ Il est difficile de se fier aux autorités tunisiennes. L'absence de dispositif aux normes pour prévenir et gérer ce genre de crises, d'apres le Global Health Security Index (Johns Hopkins University)
jette le doute sur leur maitrise de la situation. (Voir
1/ Same for any Tunisian of sound mind, especially given the revival of Turkish imperialist mindset. However, Turkey has very strong allies within our political system and state who have not hesitated to put Turkish interests above national interest.
2/ I'm talking about Ennahdha, who feel under the threat of geopolitical isolation (as a party, not as the Gov of Tunisia) since Sisi coup + Trump election, and even more since Qatar-GCC feud. Turkish AKP remains their most reliable external ally.
3/ They appeared inclined to provide Turkey with economic privileges at the detriment of the national interest (e.g. trade conditions detrimental to our local producers, balance of trade, forex reserves).
Maltese and Tunisian are so close that a Maltese kid on a bus in Valetta asked his mother how come we (a group of Tunisian tourists) spoke Maltese.
As a Tunisian I do not need any extra learning to read Maltese poetry or understand a political speech in Maltese or indeed have a sophisticated conversation with Maltese friends.
Ne pas avoir de famille politique dans son propre pays est frustrant.
1) Aucune force politique ne prône une politique étrangère réaliste et ne semble déterminée à défendre coûte que coûte les intérêts tunisiens en matière de coopération internationale. Aucun parti ne semble
Capable d'imaginer la possibilité de dire non ne serait-ce qu'occasionnellement. Tous cherchent l'approbation des puissances occidentales plutôt que de rééquilibrer le rapport.
2) Toutes les forces politiques, y compris celles qui se targuent d'être libérales, sont profondément
Jacobines, dogmatiquement étatistes et incapables de repenser le rapport entre l'Etat et le citoyen. Toutes sont collectivistes et n'ont pas d'égards pour l'individu qu'elles ne conçoivent que comme asservi au collectif.
3) Aucune force politique n'ose penser que la fonction