Sorry, but...
Deuteronomy 22:5 NASB
"A woman shall not wear man's clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman's clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God. | via startthis.org/?p=1315
That is what it says. Do with it what you will. | via startthis.org/?p=1319
Of course, Christians are not under the law, and they certainly cannot pick and choose which moral rules they wish to respect based on political convenience. | via startthis.org/?p=1321
Here is another relevant verse to trans issues from Jewish law:

Deuteronomy 23:1 NASB
"No one who is emasculated or has his male organ cut off shall enter the assembly of the LORD.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Larry Sanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lsanger

29 Jul
More evidence of the rapid movement toward normalizing pedophilia: porn for children! Because otherwise, they'll watch the hardcore stuff! 🤮
But but let's be fair. She deleted it. It's OK. She didn't really mean it. Right?

She was more viciously savaged than almost anyone I can think of on Twitter.

Hopefully, she will learn her lesson, and it will be the correct one: sexualizing children is horrifically wrong.

That said, it warms my heart that people came out so aggressively against this.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jul
The Atlantic bemoans an " 'infodemic'—involving the viral spread of misinformation, as well as the mingling of facts with half-truths and falsehoods in a fractured media environment—has compounded the COVID-19 pandemic."

Bunk.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/… | via ...
Read 5 tweets
26 Jul
A "counterterrrorism" org formed by Big Tech is expanding a database of "extremist content" they share, "aiming to crack down on...white supremacists and far-right militias".

I suppose I'm an "extremist," or will be soon.

msn.com/en-us/news/wor… | via ...
My views haven't changed; but the Overton Window is sliding left all the time.

We need to know their real, operational definition of "extremist," etc. Is Covid skepticism extremism? Supporting Trump? Skepticism about the 2020 elections?
Read 6 tweets
25 Jul
Much of the "woke" and "cancel" culture of the last seven years or so (it really started ramping up around 2014) is basically softening up the culture for an all-out attack on the #Bible and Christians. Just wait. It won't be pretty. | via startthis.org/?p=1265
I wish I was wrong, but I'm not.

Gay marriage? Totally unbiblical.

gotquestions.org/gay-marriage.h…
Women preachers? Well, let's just say that the people who endorse the practice are the same sort of people who are comfy with creative interpretations of large parts of the Bible.

biblestudytools.com/bible-study/to…
Read 13 tweets
19 Jul
Whatever you're tweeting about is not as important as the fact that the Biden administration announced last wk that it coordinates with Facebook to censor online content. Thread:

Biden update:
nypost.com/2021/07/16/psa…

Psaki/Murthy admissions:
nypost.com/2021/07/15/whi… | via ...
Why so important?

Because it's real, live government censorship. They can say, "Well, we're just having our experts flag misinformation," but, and this is the important point:

That is the government participating in censorship.

It's illegal. Seriously.
How did we get here? A combination of things.

(a) There has been a steady drumbeat from governments and NGOs (to say nothing of other influential institutions) globally about "misinformation" and "fake news." So it is an Establishment talking point.

msn.com/en-us/news/new…
Read 10 tweets
19 Jul
Sharing because I promised I would. What do you Westerners reckon? Or should we stay out of such things?
I'm muting all future notifications about this.

I retweeted the thread. I also explained why I refuse to do more. I cannot chase down every supposed miscarriage of justice Wikipedia is involved in.
I permanently cut ties with Wikipedia in early 2003. I can't control Wikipedia; they hate me there. It is unreasonable to expect me to use my voice in every case where Wikipedia does something seriously wrong.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(