@mjmauboussin and Dan Callahan published another piece on valuation defending the use of DCF model.
Here are some interesting quotes from the piece.
2/ "Whenever investors value a stake in a cash-generating asset, they should recognize that they are using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model."
3/ "A speculator, who buys a stock in anticipation that it will go up without reference to its value. Investors and speculators have always coexisted in markets, and the behavior of many market participants is a blend of the two. But it is useful to keep in mind that these are...
4/ .. separate activities."
"At the end of the day, the intrinsic value, determined by the present value of future cash flows, attracts the price like a magnetic force."
5/ "Public stock exchanges are wondrous. When you buy a stock, you trade cash for a portion of the future cash flows of a business. When you sell a stock, you trade the cash flows for cash. It’s a form of time travel."
6/ "...in venture capital the price of a new round of financing is often set by the buyer who is willing to pay most for the stake, and those who think the price is too high have no ready way to sell."
7/ "Price discovery is weak in private markets because the optimists can buy but the pessimists can’t sell."
8/ Interesting data comparing VC, private equity, and public markets.
~60% VC investments lost money vs 27% in PE vs 25% in public markets (over 5 yrs).
9/ "valuation using multiples does not avoid the drivers of long-term cash flows but rather obscures them. Williams argues that it is better to make your assumptions explicit and debate them than to make them implicit and ignore them."
10/ "if an analyst wants to recommend that the investment firm buy a stock, he or she will select the stocks of comparable companies that have high valuations, making the focal stock look relatively inexpensive."
11/ this is basically what I do.
12/ “. . . bond selection is primarily a negative art. It is a process of exclusion and rejection, rather than of search and acceptance. In this respect the contrast with common-stock selection is fundamental in character.”
I always enjoy reading IAC shareholder letter and this was no exception. Q&A, however, gets a bit too lengthy and repetitive.
Here are my notes.
2/ ANGI
“They say home improvement projects usually take twice as long and cost twice as much relative to expectations going in, and one of our goals at Angi is to prove that axiom false. Ironically, delivering that proof appears to be, well, taking us longer and costing us more"
3/ “Exercising options creates the most attention, but creating options builds the most value.”
Mixed quarter. Slightly disappointing guidance, and some word of caution for even beyond 3Q’21.
We have entered the treacherous stage for Covid beneficiary stocks, and the broader picture may remain a bit hazy for quite some time.
Here are my notes.
2/ For the past 5 quarters, Etsy comfortably beat high end of GMS guidance. Not this time even though it spent 31.7% of revenue in Sales & Marketing (+491 bps YoY) in 2Q’21.
3/ # of sellers sequentially increased by 531K QoQ which is really impressive. For context, it took Etsy 4 quarters pre-pandemic to add 587K sellers.
Many one-off mask buyers left which stalled # of buyers.
I have been active on fintwit for almost a year and half now. When I decided to get out of my lurking phase, I could never imagine this account could ever become such a huge part in my life.
Let me share my philosophy for building this account.
2/ I treat fintwit as my workplace. I try not to tweet something that I would not tweet if my followers were my colleagues.
3/ I do not want to get on a content treadmill which many creators seem to suffer from.
I want to create a fair amount of detachment from input and output.
We have all been whispering about tough comps for Covid beneficiary companies, and the comps were indeed quite tough.
Let’s look at segment by segment and some highlights from the call.
2/ First, here’s the breakdown of revenue by segment (both product and geography)
3/ Given 2Q’20 was the beginning of the massive pandemic tailwind, it is more instructive to see 2-yr and 3-yr CAGR to see the underlying strength of the business.
As investors kept searching for the next “Google”, it turns out you could have done pretty well betting on the real Google with YTD of ~60% or ~30% CAGR in the last 3 and 5 years.
Here are my highlights from the earnings call and quarter.
2/ Every quarter, big tech continues to bend our minds with their numbers.
Regression to the mean? Pfft.
3/ YouTube is growing at 40% and YouTube ads revenue itself was 95% of $NFLX revenue last quarter.
In 1Q’19, YouTube ads was ~67% of NFLX revenue.
YouTube is a beast, and perhaps NFLX isn’t really “big tech”!