$PANR $PTHRF. Human nature is funny- on 7/16 pantheon went up intraday 20% on a big resource upgrade which over the subsequent 3 weeks has now been erased. So lets recap (1)we’ve found out that the resource is much larger (2) oil draws last 3 weeks have by and large been bigger
Than expected implying the bull case for oil even with the delta variant is stronger (look at Indian demand which has bounced right back- the epicenter of the delta). (3) much closer to the timing of another webinar to provide a lot of color on the resource and potentially more
News flow on other zones. Many of my picks like $AR went down 50% first before exploding up 20x (hence a 10 bagger). Conviction cant be rented and you have to do your own work but one recipe i know will turn bad is chasing strength and selling weakness and just churning the a/c.
I still see panr as at least a 5 pound stock (albeit with high risk) as the market realizes how tight oil is and there is a resource with billions of barrels of oil in a politically safe (assuming USA Is still safe lol) jurisdiction.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with contrarian 8888

contrarian 8888 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @contrarian8888

15 Jul
Few weeks ago I completed selling 90% of my $AR (& all my $oxy( & moved 1/2 to $btu (at sub $3 & $7.2) & the other to an unnamed energy stock.Ive been asked incessantly what the name of that security is.Before revealing it, I’d like to make some housekeeping items out of the way
As mentioned in my pinned tweet, nothing i say should be construed as investment advice. Do your own due diligence & seek a financial advisor if the investment is for you. Secondly, given the recent string of successes & the likely mean reversion in my track record, shorting
This name may be the better outcome. With that being said, although for long time followers, they may say i had mentioned this before, i never owned more than an extremely tiny allocation and post my $ar sales i have super sized it such that i allocated 2x what i allocated to
Read 25 tweets
20 May
$AGE Great update by @PrudentInvest1 In addition the market is forgetting about the massive potential in ARUP (alligator River Valley) which is home to the ranger mines (they have the 2nd biggest tenament) and Big lake- which is conducive to ISR mining. I dont normally traffic
In such small names but from speaking to Greg Hall who joined the company in ‘18, he has done a # of acquisitions, taking a sleepy company with a string of well thought out acquisitions. The
Mgmt team is 1st class with Peter McIntyre & John Main (substantial $AGE shareholders/directors) that took extract from 30c to $8.65 in the last cycle. Insider ownership at 23%, a hungry & extremely competent mgmt team- esp in a sub $100m mkt cap that would rival any of the bozo
Read 5 tweets
18 Mar
$pdn. I feel the naysayers on paladin never seem to give up. I recall a hit piece by @mikontwitti/@crux not that long ago in oct 2019 (stock was 9c & fell to 7.5c) which at the time a lot of folks on twitter thought was brilliant. (Tgt px 5c i believe) . I defended the stock
Then & along with @SachemCove & @SegraU3O8 we each took turns (we were all together at a Nuclear conf) & over beers each bought millions of shares of $PDN on the cheap- thank you Mikon (I’m blocked by him fyi). So now moving on to this analysis .
Ill make 3 points 1. The EV did not change due to this deal. 2. If you think that Uranium which has been under supplied for years and has a monster shortfall will just go to $55 well then go sell it. On yesterday’s panel Dustin Garrow/@FootnotesFirst talked about uranium going to
Read 10 tweets
17 Mar
$PDN $PALAF. I did not want to tweet about pdn until i spoke with the ceo- Ian Purdy which i did last night. This deal is totally transformational. (Much like when $ar raised money which dropbox.com/s/p2t05wnhzcn0…
Was a s-t hiccup but stock more than 3x a short 6 mos later. I would say the #1 concern on pdn has been the debt overhang which has now been cleared. In addition this allows them as stated in their news release to go slower in signing contracts and not contract Uranium at sub
Optimal prices (SORRY UTILTY BUYERS LOL). Ian will be putting every single $ he has ever earned from PDN into the deal at 37c - this is not like some Uranium cos ceos that earn $2m a year,wear expensive suits and have their stock px go up 30% for buying 400k lbs of U and promote
Read 9 tweets
13 Mar
Inflation- a thread. I think a lot of people look at inflation but dont realise that many of the structural forces over the past decade have changed. @BvddyCorleone has already today done a phenomenal thread on energy and why long term supply discipline in place will result in
Higher energy prices. The lack of commodity investments in scores of other industries- be it Uranium, Ags, Copper etc all indicate that we will have rising commodity price inflation for years to come. But this is not all there are other less understood forces at play.
@DiMartinoBooth weekly piece this wk did a great job showing how exceptionally generous fiscal support for a mother of 2 kids (one over 7,one under 7) leads to a real unwillingness to enter the labor mkt
Read 8 tweets
13 Mar
Phenomenal thread.I agree fully that the old playbook has changed and oil companies are too focused on paying down debt and being rewarded by investors as opposed to drilling more. This is important and clearly that would have +ve cyclical ramifications for energy to do well. BUT
I’d add that there is a labor market hysteresis focus by Yellen and the Fed whereby in many of their speeches they have focused extensively on stimulating to maintain full employment-ie the benefit of maintaining full employment numbers is far
Better than that of any inflation. In fact even Brainard mentioned that the we need to accommodate inflation and not react in a Phillips curve framework. Couple this exceptional fed monetary looseness + fiscal stimulus galore- ask yourself will the Dems allow next year to have a
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(