Phenomenal thread.I agree fully that the old playbook has changed and oil companies are too focused on paying down debt and being rewarded by investors as opposed to drilling more. This is important and clearly that would have +ve cyclical ramifications for energy to do well. BUT
I’d add that there is a labor market hysteresis focus by Yellen and the Fed whereby in many of their speeches they have focused extensively on stimulating to maintain full employment-ie the benefit of maintaining full employment numbers is far
Better than that of any inflation. In fact even Brainard mentioned that the we need to accommodate inflation and not react in a Phillips curve framework. Couple this exceptional fed monetary looseness + fiscal stimulus galore- ask yourself will the Dems allow next year to have a
Big fiscal gap or will there be more and more fiscal packages- i presume the latter. Add in the fire from a TGA liquidation and you have exceptionally boom type conditions + benefit from huge pent up demand/excess savings etc etc. Now everyone thinks this will just last 1-2
Quarters and then we will go back to the deflationary view we have been in for the last 12 years. i disagree with the view because the govts have discovered FISCAL and the fed is now focused on inequality and labor mkt hysteresis- this means exceptionally loose fiscal+monetary
Leading to a new regime change benefiting commodities and crippling growth stocks. (Which i see multiples easily falling 50%). This month has been the appetizer but to think that a regime shift has happened where investors have focuses on bonds/tech stocks for 12 years and have
All shifted to Energy and commodities is asinine. This regime shift will take many many quarters and only when I see people convinced commodities are the only game in town will i think the cycle has played out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Inflation- a thread. I think a lot of people look at inflation but dont realise that many of the structural forces over the past decade have changed. @BvddyCorleone has already today done a phenomenal thread on energy and why long term supply discipline in place will result in
Higher energy prices. The lack of commodity investments in scores of other industries- be it Uranium, Ags, Copper etc all indicate that we will have rising commodity price inflation for years to come. But this is not all there are other less understood forces at play.
@DiMartinoBooth weekly piece this wk did a great job showing how exceptionally generous fiscal support for a mother of 2 kids (one over 7,one under 7) leads to a real unwillingness to enter the labor mkt
#Uranium, $PDN $PALAF. Ive been giving it a lot of thought on the next stages of the Uranium moves. So clearly the move up in equities vs a spot px that has been languishing has caused many of the older hands some consternation. I think partly this has been caused by a huge
Outperformance in energy equities causing a need to reallocate funds from funds that are short/underweight energy coupled with a ESG problem. See below that according to JPM there may be $22bln that needs to flow into energy. As such money is flowing into many deals given
Nuclear is perceived as ESG compliant. Now this is +ve and i would think its only a matter of time before the uranium holding cos URPTF, Yellowcake which are now trading at premiums to NAV issue equity and soak up some of the spot driving prices higher. I believe this will
$PDN. ($PALAF) I know paladin energy has been a rocket ship and after conversing with the ceo i am even more pumped. The uranium market is extremely quiet because of the lockdowns and covid restrictions raging throughout Europe & the US. That being said their view is by
Feb or early March, the term market will pick up considerably. A lot of utilities drew down on inventories last year because they weren’t willing to hit the spot mkt. This game can only last so long and by summer they will just need to sign contracts. Ian mentioned that a
Firm had commissioned 2 reactors worth (>10$bn each) and had just secured 2 years of U supply. The ratio of capex spent on just commissioning a multi billion dollar plant and then barely having much U supply is just nuts. This is because the market is lulled but he expects it to
$pdn, $uuuu. Firstly i used to be a huge bull on energy fuels and bought it at $1.6 in 2018 (spring) and sold it in 4/19 at $4. I even told people then it was the height of insanity for people to think (lot of newbies entered uranium then) thinking uranium would be $70 tomorrow
With section 232. Well i enjoyed missing over a 50% collapse in the share px. Seeing uuuu again today at over a $600m mkt cap (including all the newly issued shares over the period ive been out of the stock (+40% increase in share count) vs a $pdn at 350m mkt cap with 4x the
Resources & prodn at 6m when they restart (uuuu will need over 400m$ (i know this from my conversations with mgmt) to get to just 4m prodn capacity & you can tell we’ve again hit insanity with little analysis as new investors chase a stupid 75$M in govt buying which is
Possibly the most profound monetary event in decades. It will allow china to impose -ve rates on its citizens and I’m fascinated to see how China allows digital yuan to coexist with btc. wsj.com/articles/china…
As this weekend’s cacophony of cheering (is it just my feed or are people refreshing their browsers every 2 mins and deciding to post the updated BTC px?-so much so that I’m tempted to mute the word btc from my feed). It would be nonetheless interesting to see how btc competes
With An actual govt that has its own digital currency. For those that say btc is more powerful than china-i heard the same about a Jack Ma who seems to be a bug being quickly squashed by the Chinese govt. So maybe I’m behind the times but given the stated risks, I continue to
Grant and his guests always give you a ton to ponder. Agree with pretty much everything they discuss. 1 long energy. 2 #DCEP is a massive threat to podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the…
Btc and 99% of the folks trading crypto have no concept of what is going on in china.( china is responsible for 65% of btc hash power)
@EconguyRosie post a few days ago that being —ve on btc is like calling your first born ugly and the visceral reaction being similar to tech investors in 99 or housing investors in 06 is