Like text, images hold info. I like to think of my images in terms of question-centered design as well. Here's a system of levels I've made to help me organize images:
1. Observational, descriptive. What something is, its inherent form, materials and characteristics. (what, who)
2. Contextual, locative. Puts the subject in a setting, either placing it in geographic or temporal space. Gives us the position relative to time or location. (where, when)
3. Sequential, procedural, constructive. Showing change in the subject over time or location to location. How to, creation, evolution. (How)
4. Interpretive. Explains relationships between multiple subjects. Can reveal difference, similarity, correlation, causation. (Why)
5. Bring it home with Narrative. Use 1-4 to tell us a story, and tell us WHY WE SHOULD CARE!
Think of your #graphics as tools in your #infographic or #sciviz. They don't just support, but collaborate with text to get your message across!
Alright, another common misconception I encounter is the gene vs allele/variant mixup. Most often I see it phrased something like "She has the gene for breast cancer."
In this example, I think we all understand what the person means: she has a genetic variant that makes her more predisposed to breast cancer. For a lot of purposes, that's the only information we really need.
But in reality, we all have two copies or alleles of the BRCA2 gene, one from each parent. But some of us have versions of that gene that make us more prone to developing breast cancer.
Alright, time to talk some DNA misconceptions and how we can try and break them down!
First up, myths about dominant and recessive traits.
This one hurts, because I thought a lot of these were true for a while!
Often when learning about genetics, we learn that things like tongue-rolling, attached earlobes, and PTC tasting are pure dominant/recessive traits. They're simple, easy traits to demonstrate in a classroom.
But unfortunately, many of them aren't really true dominant/recessive traits! There's a great website called "Myths of Human Genetics" by John H. McDonald at the University of Delaware that breaks down where many of these myths came from: udel.edu/~mcdonald/myth…
Good morning, all! Today, we're gonna talk about the importance of SciComm in Genetics. Why genetics specifically?
Because that's what my PhD is in, so I'm biased towards it being the coolest science 😂.
BUT ALSO because I strongly believe we're all increasingly asked to make choices that involve genetics in our everyday lives, and I want to equip everyone with the vocabulary to feel comfortable making these choices, from getting a DNA test at the doctor to understanding GMOs.
And while I've believed this for a long time, it was thrown into an incredible spotlight over the past few years, as things like PCR and RNA became household words. Imagine my delight as I saw RNA trending, and then the sadness as I found threads full of misinformation.