🧬8/5 Connecticut #SARSCoV2 variant surveillance
@CovidCT | @jacksonlab | @CTDPH | @YaleSPH | @Yalemed

88% - Delta (B.1.617.2 + AY.3)
8% - B.1.621 (no greek letter yet)
3% - Gamma (P.1)
<1% - Alpha (B.1.1.7)
0% - everything else

short 🧡 | Report πŸ‘‰
covidtrackerct.com/variant-survei…
Delta in Connecticut (~88%) is a bit behind the national average of 93%, but generally following the national trends. (2/9)

covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra…
Besides Delta, the other major story here is B.1.621. It's now firmly the second most frequent variant in CT (~8%), and has so far been able to maintain its ground against the expansion of Delta. Something that Alpha, Gamma, and everything else couldn't do. (3/9)
B.1.621 (first detected in Colombia) does not yet have a WHO greek letter, but IMO, its just a matter of time. It has several key spike mutations - E484K, N501Y, and P681H - and is now being found at high frequencies in other states. (4/9)

washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07…
While we were able to fix our B.1.621 submission issue with GISAID, its still an issue for other groups. Almost certainly B.1.621 is under-reported in some regions in this CDC figure (not of the fault of the CDC). The GISAID issue means there there are still back-logs. (5/9)
In CT, the reported cases are ~12/100K population/day, but Covidestim reports a much higher estimated infection rate at ~72/100K population/day. This is similar to our neighbors, but much lower than states in the south (e.g. FL = 335, LA = 552). (6/9)
Link to covidestim to look at the numbers yourself (7/9)
covidestim.org
Our variant-specific RT estimates show that most of the rise in cases is coming from Delta (Rt = 1.59) and B.1.621 (Rt = 1.34; shown as Non-VOC/VOI), with the rest not currently playing a critical role. (8/9)
I'd like to once again thank my entire team. As cases rise, so does our work. Its a very tough time a year to be busy again, and we all just want a long break. But as always, they step up to keep the surveillance system running. I owe them lots of 🍻(9/9)

grubaughlab.com/team/

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Nathan Grubaugh

Nathan Grubaugh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NathanGrubaugh

29 Jul
πŸ“’ PSA for GISAID submitters/users

All of our B.1.621 + B.1.621.1 (important emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant) submissions are being rejected by GISIAD. This has some important implications that data producers + public health agencies should be aware of.

Technical 🧡(1/12)
We usually have a few sequences/week that get rejected for QC reasons (eg indel in a string of As or Ts). It takes a few days for these to be fixed and reposted. Sometimes longer depending on our bandwidth. These are usually a random distribution so not a problem if delayed(2/12)
This past week we had 40+ sequences get rejected, and almost all of them were B.1.621/B.1.621.1. @JosephFauver found that all of these sequences have a 4 nt deletion in ORF3A that results in a premature stop codon about ~50 nt upstream. GISAID sees these and kicks them back(3/12)
Read 12 tweets
19 Jul
Some further musings on our work with @carolilucas, @VogelsChantal, @InciYildirim11, @SaadOmer3,
& @VirusesImmunity. I'll start by nerding πŸ€“ out on some of the genetics and end with some thoughts πŸ€” about vaccination strategies (/gasp). (1/22)

One of the 😎 parts of our study is that we used virus isolates (not pseudovirsues) that represent much of the genetic diversity in our region. This allowed us to examine local effects and to dive into the genetic components of πŸ’‰neutralization (2/22)

These are the results that I want to spend some time with as there is a lot to unpack here. I know that I am a bit biased, but this is such a 😎 figure! (3/22)

Read 23 tweets
15 Jul
🧬7/15 Connecticut #SARSCoV2 variant surveillance
@CovidCT | @jacksonlab | @CTDPH | @YaleSPH | @YaleMed

Alpha (B.1.1.7) = 27% (πŸ“ˆ8%)
Delta (B.1.617.2) = 64% (πŸ“ˆ11%)

**Delta is now likely the dominant variant in CT**

short 🧡 | Report πŸ‘‰
covidtrackerct.com/variant-survei…
2/10 Our data combined with the CDC indicates that Delta was ~64% by 6/28 in Connecticut and may have been as high as 80% by 7/6 (remember that sequencing data always has a bit of a lag). Also, the rise in Delta is replacing almost all other variants. Image
3/10 In addition to B.1.617.2, we are also seeing the sub-lineages AY.1, AY.2, and AY.3, which are all classified as Delta. Some AY.1's have K417N and some AY.2's have V70F. AY.3 is defined by mutations outside of spike. The functional differences between these are unknown. Image
Read 10 tweets
1 Jul
🧬7/1 Connecticut #SARSCoV2 variant surveillance
@CovidCT | @jacksonlab | @CTDPH | @YaleSPH | @Yalemed

Alpha (B.1.1.7) = 50% (πŸ“‰9%)
Delta (B.1.617.2) = 13.6% (πŸ“ˆ11%)

short 🧡 | Report πŸ‘‰
covidtrackerct.com/variant-survei…
2/9 Last week when we reported that Delta was only 2.3% I said: "This is probably more of a reflection of noisy data when trying estimate frequencies from a small number of cases", and followed that up with an expectation that we will see Delta πŸ“ˆ.

3/9 This week we are seeing the expected πŸ“ˆ in Delta (B.1.617.2), but the caveat still remains that our estimates are noisy because of the low numbers of sequenced cases (a product of the low numbers of cases, which is a good problem to have πŸ‘)
Read 9 tweets
24 Jun
🧬6/24 Connecticut #SARSCoV2 variant surveillance
@CovidCT | @jacksonlab | @CTDPH | @YaleSPH | @Yalemed | @YNHH

Alpha (B.1.1.7) = 59% (πŸ“ˆ2%)
Gamma (P.1) = 4.5% (πŸ“‰6.4%)
Delta (B.1.617.2) = 2.3% (πŸ“‰4.2%)

short 🧡 | Report πŸ‘‰
covidtrackerct.com/variant-survei…
2/8 In Connecticut, the % of sequenced cases that are the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) decreased in recent weeks. This is probably more of a reflection of noisy data when trying estimate frequencies from a small number of cases vs an actual decline in delta.
3/8 Looking at our neighbors in Massachusetts and New York, delta is 10-20%, so we in Connecticut are probably pretty close to that. My guess is that we'll see a πŸ“ˆ in delta in the coming weeks to reflect the trends of our neighbors.
Read 9 tweets
11 Jun
🧬6/10 Connecticut #SARSCoV2 variant surveillance
@CovidCT | @jacksonlab | @CTDPH | @YaleSPH | @Yalemed | @YNHH

Alpha (B.1.1.7) = 57% (πŸ“‰11%)
Gamma (P.1) = 10.9% (πŸ“ˆ2.7%)
Delta (B.1.617.2) = 6.5% (πŸ“ˆ3.2%)

short 🧡 | Report πŸ‘‰
covidtrackerct.com/variant-survei…
2/7 Gamma (P.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) continue rising in Connecticut, while Alpha (B.1.1.7) and others decline, following national trends (see next tweet).
3/7 Data from outbreak.info shows that in the US πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, Delta (B.1.617.2) is πŸ“ˆ exponentially, while Alpha (B.1.1.7) is on the πŸ“‰. Despite this, COVID-19 cases are still dropping (for now).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(