This illustrates tokenism and half-measures taken to the extreme. And a large part of the problem is the teaching community in these IIsT (and the like).

When you think of Reservations for a particular class of people, you also have to anticipate the problems ... +
... they might face in adapting to the expectations of making it to and thriving in an atmosphere they have no exposure to (socially/culturally).

"If you got in here, you're expected to *get it* on your own and by yourself" - does not cut it. And it's self-serving AF...
+
... because it excuses the teaching community from actually thinking through what they are REQUIRED to do - to make sure the "reserved" category of students cope, thrive and succeed.

When you decide you're going to take affirmative action, you've got to anticipate ... +
... what IT WOULD BE LIKE for those students. You have to have the imagination to be able to empathize enough and structure your teaching approach to their needs. Not say - "You've made it and now you're on your own".

That just shows that you're either dumb AF or inept ... +
... as a teacher (because it is your teaching ability which is under question, if students drop out).

It's doubly difficult, if not outright impossible, for kids to come up from where they do and somehow adapt, when YOU - as a teacher - cannot.

It's no surprise, actually... +
... that this psychological pressure and unnecessary burden of unreasonable expectations weighs heavily on them. So, they leave - because they're consistently made to feel that they're a "burden" that the others have to bear.
This goes deeper, BTW. Attitudes "leak", no matter how you might mask them. Kids from disadvantaged backgrounds pick up the smallest of cues in your responses to them versus the "regular" "meritorious" kinds.

The thing about psychology - if things are that deep-rooted - ...+
... is that these beliefs/attitudes leak. Particularly under stress e.g. when dealing with additional work relating to making what you're teaching easily understood to those you believe "don't have it in them".

And IF your attitudes leak, you've failed in your duty ... +
... and responsibility as a leader/role-model, which is incumbent on you - the moment you claim you're a teacher.

Kids of 17/18 - when they come in - are impressionable #idiots. No matter how "bright" you'd want to believe they are. And they (un)consciously seek to ...+
... model themselves on you. That is - what they see of you. They don't *know* you (and won't), but they'll not miss the cues and mirror your attitudes. Including what LEAKS.

It's your bloody job to disabuse them of such nonsense. If you were to, the toxic peer environments...+
... which also contribute to the 'Reserved' category students quitting would be less so.

Your eyes should "light up" - not just when you talk to the "bright sparks" of the 'General' category, but also when engaging with someone 'Reserved' musters up the courage to walk up ... +
... to you and ask a Q or ask to clarify a doubt.

If you're not up for it, you're not fit to teach in any institute that advertises affirmative action.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with G Raghuram

G Raghuram Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @UntergrundmannG

3 Aug
Done reading. Seems a bit out of date, with the references to "blogs", but it isn't. What it describes is now mainstream media practice.

Excellent read. Helped affirm intuitions that built up in me over the past 3-4 years as well as fill in gaps re: the mechanics.
#MustRead
+ Image
Also helped assert a sound basis to some rules I've found myself adopting online e.g. on here:

If anything is a trigger, I refuse to act on it. The check is always what I feel - if angry, outraged or shocked, the reflex-in-training is to feel the emotion and Do Nothing.
+
Reaction from me does not come cheap and certainly not easily or so frequently. If someone wants it, they have to work harder/do better.

If something's rapidly getting traction, ignore it till the dust settles. As it is, there's sweet f'all I can do about something already ...+
Read 5 tweets
8 May
#COVID19India

This is something I observed at the first dose as well, at a fancy hospital for a paid appointment.

Out of three, there are two stages which take time, one of which could be eliminated, if the GoI wanted. More on that later.

Registration takes ...+
...between 5-15 minutes. Typically, there seems to be only one registration desk per centre. The injection takes less than 5 minutes. A 30 minute observation wait is mandated.

The numbers of *immediate* AEFIs following injection suggest an infinitesimally minuscule risk. +
But you wouldn't want to have the observation area unsupervised by a trained medical staff. So, it's possible to hold a mid-sized count of people safely at that stage.

Ideally, if I were to hold 10 at a go in the observation area for 30 minutes. I would need to get 10 ...+
Read 8 tweets
8 May
#COVID19India: Summary View

TPR > 40%: GA
TPR > 30%: DL,WB
TPR > 20%: CH,CT,HP,HR,KA,KL,MH,MP,RJ

TPR growth negative for CT, DL, MH, MP, UP
+
#COVID19India: Summary View

Weekly Case Growth
> 40%: AP,AS,HP,JK
> 30%: GA,OR,TN

*Negative for CT, DL,GJ,MH,MP,TG,UP

Average of 15% with a max of 52%

*Validate with testing growth/CFR
+
#COVID19India: Summary View

Average testing growth is a very low 3% against 16% for cases. AP, GA, HP, OR, PB and TN stand out with growth > 10%.

Negative for AS, BR, GJ, JH, KA, TG, UT. Marginally positive for JK, RJ

MH the only state with case decline > testing decline.
+
Read 4 tweets
7 May
#COVID19India: Summary View

Most states now have their latest TPR > 10% (contra WHO ref level of 5% and below). Average now risen to 19%+ on the higher side of the inner 1st-3rd quantile range from 14%-23%

TPR growth negative for CT, DL, JH, MH, MP and UP
+
#COVID19India: Summary View

Weekly case growth > 40% for AP, AS, HP and JK and > 30% for GA, KA, OR, TN

*Negative for CT, DL, GJ, MH, MP, TG, UP

*Validate with Testing growth and lagged CFR rates
+
#COVID19India: Summary View

Testing growth for most < 10% at an average of 7% in the range 0-10%. Negative growth for AS, CH, GJ, JK, KA, TG.

AP testing high, but cases rising faster. JH stands out with a > 50% boost.
MH the only state with cases declining faster than tests.
+
Read 4 tweets
6 May
#COVID19India: Summary View

Removed UT from the list due to testing data issues.

Latest TPR shifts higher to the range 5%-41% with most states in the band 13%-23% with an average of 19%

TPR growth very high for AS, HP, JK and KA. Negative for AP, CT, DL, MH, MP and UP
+ ImageImageImage
#COVID19India: Summary View

Case growth drops to a Doubling of 50D or more for a number of states - BR, CH, JH, RJ, TG - and is negative for CT, DL, GJ, MH, MP and UP

Continues to rise for the rest in the range 0.5%-54% with an average of 18%.

> 40% for AP, AS, HP and JK
+ ImageImage
#COVID19India: Summary View

AP maintains a standout testing growth. The others show relatively much lower test growth in the range 3%-16% with an average of 4% WoW.

Testing declines for AS, BR, GJ, JH, JK, KA, RJ and TG.
Case decline faster than tests decline for DL and MH.
+ ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
2 May
There are certain matters on which - for the survival (or a better future) of the collective - everyone (aka those whose survival is not threatened) contributes to or invests in. Education, Public Health, National Security are three well understood cases.

Those who ...+
... argue stupidly for "free markets" in these contexts haven't , quite clearly, thought through any of this and so end up betraying their immature understanding of how markets and societies generally function.

It can also be considered a form of insurance by/for those...+
...that have the most to lose (wealth, status, authority etc). There aren't too many of them - if you get the drift. So when things get bad, if it were everyone for himself, there's nothing preventing the larger # of threatened members of the society from banding together...+
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(