One reason I’m convinced that viruses moderate their pathogenicity much more than is often appreciated comes from observations of hemorrhagic fevers, which give fascinating insights
/1


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_hem…
People occasionally pick up viruses from animals especially rodents & bats. Usually they cause mild flu-like symptoms but here's the extraordinary thing: if they get a hold they often cause internal & external bleeding & are fatal – in spite of NOT being well-adapted to humans
/2
Ebola is one example. There are many others eg Rift Valley, Lujo, Bolivian and Brazilian hem. fevers. Ebola, Marburg, Crimean-Congo and Lassa hem. fevers can spread from person to person.
/3


facebook.com/watch/?v=27782…
In the last, say, 1 million years, diseases as pathogenic as Ebola must have “spilled over” to our ancestors hundreds of times. Where are they now? The long-term trend towards moderate pathogenicity is clear.
4/
And . . . why do Ebola, Marburg etc so often kill us (if they get a hold) while rhinovirus, RSV and adenovirus usually don’t – when they’ve been in what scientists describe as an “arms race” with humans for centuries?
5/
The answer has to be that rhinovirus etc have evolved to replicate and spread without making us very sick. They want to keep us MOVING AROUND – as predicted by the virulence-transmission trade-off model. So they moderate their pathogenicity
6/
doi.org/10.1002/rmv.22…
Video if you prefer

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Shaw Stewart

Patrick Shaw Stewart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PatrickSSte

8 Aug
I've noticed that explanations for resp-vir seasonality involving humidity are becoming more popular

Eg doi.org/10.1101/2020.0… by @EdsardRavelli
1/
The problem is that we essentially have ONE observation - that hundreds of often unrelated viruses in all regions (outside the Tropics) with very diverse climates, have winter seasonality
2/
If we say the winter surge of colds in one place is due to eg school buses, business travel and humidity, but somewhere else it's sports events, snow and sunshine, we are cheating. We’re “overfitting” - we are using too many variables to model a 1-d phenomenon
3/
Read 10 tweets
26 Jul
THREAD (quite long - sorry!)

IMO you can’t understand CoV-2 or any other virus without understanding the "virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis"
This hypothesis was introduced in the 1950s to explain observations of myxomatosis. Basically, very mild strains became moderate, while very virulent ones also became moderate

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
The hypothesis says a virus must balance the amount of shedding against the time during which the shedding takes place – the time will be reduced if viral virulence is too great
Read 24 tweets
25 Jul
1/ The Nobel laureate André Lwoff suggested part of the hypothesis in 1959, when he noted that the degree of virulence of viruses is often related to their level of thermal sensitivity

journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.112…
2/ In 1979, Richman and Murphy developed this further, discussing many examples of thermal sensitivity in natural and lab‐made viral strains, and noting that the near‐universal attenuation of ts strains made them good candidates for vaccines.
doi.org/10.1093/clinid…
3/ The full hypothesis was proposed by Shaw Stewart and discussed at length in 2016, focusing on seasonality and the natural selection of strains with varying degrees of thermal sensitivity and pathogenicity

doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy…
Read 7 tweets
16 Jul
1/5

The UK 10-day self-isolation period is highly disruptive to industry.

But it may also be counter-productive in combating Covid-19.
2/ 5

We know that Covid-19 incubation periods vary hugely, with some illnesses appearing 2 or 3 days after exposure, but others taking 14 days or more.

Some of this variation is likely to be related to the properties of the particular “isolate” (ie strain) involved.
3/ 5

It is also likely that strains with short incubation periods are more pathogenic. This is the basis of the “virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis” and has been proposed for several viruses including influenza and myxomatosis.
Read 6 tweets
25 Oct 20
Is the SPIKE protein wrong target for vaxs?

• Unbiased screen found 29 "shared epitopes" that were main targets for T-cells

• Notably, only 3 of 29 epitopes were located in spike protein

• Most epitopes were located in ORF1ab / nucleocapsid protein

cell.com/immunity/fullt…
Anyway

"Frequent BACTERIAL infections of respiratory tract are often a harbinger of ANTIBODY disorders"

"Respiratory VIRAL infections are more significant in patients with T-CELL immune deficiencies"

So why do virtually all vaxs target SPIKE PROTEIN?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Also may be very serious

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(