One reason I’m convinced that viruses moderate their pathogenicity much more than is often appreciated comes from observations of hemorrhagic fevers, which give fascinating insights
/1
People occasionally pick up viruses from animals especially rodents & bats. Usually they cause mild flu-like symptoms but here's the extraordinary thing: if they get a hold they often cause internal & external bleeding & are fatal – in spite of NOT being well-adapted to humans
/2
Ebola is one example. There are many others eg Rift Valley, Lujo, Bolivian and Brazilian hem. fevers. Ebola, Marburg, Crimean-Congo and Lassa hem. fevers can spread from person to person.
/3
In the last, say, 1 million years, diseases as pathogenic as Ebola must have “spilled over” to our ancestors hundreds of times. Where are they now? The long-term trend towards moderate pathogenicity is clear.
4/
And . . . why do Ebola, Marburg etc so often kill us (if they get a hold) while rhinovirus, RSV and adenovirus usually don’t – when they’ve been in what scientists describe as an “arms race” with humans for centuries?
5/
The answer has to be that rhinovirus etc have evolved to replicate and spread without making us very sick. They want to keep us MOVING AROUND – as predicted by the virulence-transmission trade-off model. So they moderate their pathogenicity 6/ doi.org/10.1002/rmv.22…
Video if you prefer
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The problem is that we essentially have ONE observation - that hundreds of often unrelated viruses in all regions (outside the Tropics) with very diverse climates, have winter seasonality
2/
If we say the winter surge of colds in one place is due to eg school buses, business travel and humidity, but somewhere else it's sports events, snow and sunshine, we are cheating. We’re “overfitting” - we are using too many variables to model a 1-d phenomenon
3/
IMO you can’t understand CoV-2 or any other virus without understanding the "virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis"
This hypothesis was introduced in the 1950s to explain observations of myxomatosis. Basically, very mild strains became moderate, while very virulent ones also became moderate
The hypothesis says a virus must balance the amount of shedding against the time during which the shedding takes place – the time will be reduced if viral virulence is too great
1/ The Nobel laureate André Lwoff suggested part of the hypothesis in 1959, when he noted that the degree of virulence of viruses is often related to their level of thermal sensitivity
2/ In 1979, Richman and Murphy developed this further, discussing many examples of thermal sensitivity in natural and lab‐made viral strains, and noting that the near‐universal attenuation of ts strains made them good candidates for vaccines. doi.org/10.1093/clinid…
3/ The full hypothesis was proposed by Shaw Stewart and discussed at length in 2016, focusing on seasonality and the natural selection of strains with varying degrees of thermal sensitivity and pathogenicity
The UK 10-day self-isolation period is highly disruptive to industry.
But it may also be counter-productive in combating Covid-19.
2/ 5
We know that Covid-19 incubation periods vary hugely, with some illnesses appearing 2 or 3 days after exposure, but others taking 14 days or more.
Some of this variation is likely to be related to the properties of the particular “isolate” (ie strain) involved.
3/ 5
It is also likely that strains with short incubation periods are more pathogenic. This is the basis of the “virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis” and has been proposed for several viruses including influenza and myxomatosis.