In IT you can be employed for life because the technical debt keeps piling up. The garbage collector analogy is an apt analogy. Nobody wants to do it, so they'll pay people to do it.
The most predictable path to profitability is to create a business collecting other people's garbage. The riskiest business model is to do only the cool things that everyone else wants to do.
Too many startups are fixated only on doing the next cool thing. There's a survival bias that big companies are doing all the cool things. Doing the cool thing is profitable only when you are first to pick the low-hanging fruit.
There are always new and cool things to do in the exponentially growing technology economy that we are in. So if you are swift and efficient, then you can pick off the low-hanging fruit before everyone else. But it's not a sustainable business model.
If you seek a business model that will last, then pick up the rotten fruit that has fallen to the ground that nobody else wants. Pick up someone else's garbage and someone will pay you for relieving them of the inconvenience.
IT's technical debt keeps exploding exponentially. Over the years, fads have come and gone. It has invested heavily in the fads. But people have moved on. They are busy picking the low-hanging fruit elsewhere.
Nobody wants to pick up the garbage. In fact, it's even worse. The garbage over time begins to rot. Entropy is the natural course of the universe.
When theses IT systems were developed, the technologies were all the rage. There were many information sources and people who had an interest in contributing to the growth of the technology. But once the fad is over, there is nobody to help you.
There is zero incentive for a person who wants to accelerate their career to work on a dead fad. Nobody wants to work on a dead IT fad. But the people who want to, then there is lifetime employment.
But what about that next cool thing known as Artificial Intelligence. Can AI fix all the accumulated technical debt that has amassed in companies? I doubt it's possible in the next decade. It is more likely these companies will die on the weight of the garbage they collected.
But some companies never die because they are essential to the workings of civilization (see: public institutions). These entities will continue to pile up technical debt and we can see it first hand as bureaucracy.
There is lifetime employment collecting the garbage of a bureaucracy. This is why, to have permanent employment, one must live a Kafkaesque existence.
Is it not strange that for some, the significant events of history occurred in a virtual world? I actually wasn't aware of this posting, rather, I was aware when Linux was announced by Torvalds (which came 15 days later).
Social networking was primarily on Gopher at that time. Perhaps the only reason I was interested in Linus announcement was that I was taking an OS course at that time and we were playing around with Minix. I never was an OS aficionado though.
I left university shortly after and the corporate world. There I was actually cut off from the goings-on in the internet for about a year. It was only when I joined IBM did I got exposed to the WWW.
Some interesting GPT-3 quotes. 1- Economists have predicted nine out of the last five recessions. 2-The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. 3- When in doubt, try using a bigger hammer.
4-Insanity is a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world. 5-Awe is the sense of wonder you feel when you see something that looks like it’s too big to be true. 6- To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.
7- If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. 8-The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread. 9-The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the ability to reach it.
More GPT-3 jokes. (1) Why did the Anarchist cross the road? To get to the chicken side of the free-range anarchist commune. (2) Why did the Atheist cross the road? There was no chicken, so he didn't. (3) Why did the Catholic cross the road? To get to the other confession.
(4) Why did the Evangelist cross the road? To witness to the chicken. (5) Why did the Hindu cross the road?
To get around the chicken. (6) Why did the Agnostic cross the road? To see whether the chicken was on the other side.
(7) Why did the Jihadist cross the road? To increase the body count on the other side. (8) Why did the physicist cross the road? To see what would happen. (9) Why did the theoretical physicist cross the road?
Because it was his field.
It is indeed strange that so many people in the US ignore the advice of experts. I suspect is that because they've never encountered experts in real life or they aren't aware that other people can be experts.
It is as if they live a life where everyone else seems as intelligent as they believe themselves to be. The Dunning–Kruger effect.
But this of course cannot be true, because they spend their Sundays listening to a pastor for hours. Surely that pastor is an expert at something.
I do recommend that you go through the talk before proceeding in this tweet storm.
The conclusion comes out at the very end. It is the same observation that Christopher Alexander employs in this multiple volume series 'The Nature of Order': amazon.com/Nature-Order-P…
Here's a map of the US and the delta-variant as of Aug 5. Is there a firewall that can contain the rapid rise of infections coming from the south?
Here's the covid vaccination rate as of July 1. The northeast is bordered by well-vaccinated states (i.e. IL, KY, VA). It will be problematic if there is an outbreak in IN, OH and WV. Reminds me of playing the game of Risk.
So what's going on in FL? It's in the middle of a battle. There's no firewall protecting it from lowvax states like AL. If you look at the map, the intensity of the outbreak in AL is at the border with FL.