It is indeed strange that so many people in the US ignore the advice of experts. I suspect is that because they've never encountered experts in real life or they aren't aware that other people can be experts.
It is as if they live a life where everyone else seems as intelligent as they believe themselves to be. The Dunning–Kruger effect.
But this of course cannot be true, because they spend their Sundays listening to a pastor for hours. Surely that pastor is an expert at something.
Perhaps they have a simplistic model of expertise. The people who they listen to are the same people who know everything. Pastors appear to know as much as mechanics and plumbers. Trump appears to be a genius.
But why is it that intelligent people know that there are other people in this world who have specialized expertise? They might not necessarily be as smart as yourself, but they do know more about something than you do.
What is it about the lack of intelligence that people cannot recognize expertise elsewhere outside their adopted hierarchies?
Why is it that they reserve their trust only to people they might know and not people who have credentials? What is the root of distrust?
I think we have to go back to Peirce's classifications of signs to understand this. Peirce classified signs as icons, indexes and symbols. Intelligent people have learned the skills to create new indexes.
In contrast, lesser skilled people only see icons and symbols. But they are unable to connect the dots to see how icons become symbols. They do not know what their symbols mean.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is it not strange that for some, the significant events of history occurred in a virtual world? I actually wasn't aware of this posting, rather, I was aware when Linux was announced by Torvalds (which came 15 days later).
Social networking was primarily on Gopher at that time. Perhaps the only reason I was interested in Linus announcement was that I was taking an OS course at that time and we were playing around with Minix. I never was an OS aficionado though.
I left university shortly after and the corporate world. There I was actually cut off from the goings-on in the internet for about a year. It was only when I joined IBM did I got exposed to the WWW.
Some interesting GPT-3 quotes. 1- Economists have predicted nine out of the last five recessions. 2-The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. 3- When in doubt, try using a bigger hammer.
4-Insanity is a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world. 5-Awe is the sense of wonder you feel when you see something that looks like it’s too big to be true. 6- To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.
7- If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. 8-The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread. 9-The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the ability to reach it.
More GPT-3 jokes. (1) Why did the Anarchist cross the road? To get to the chicken side of the free-range anarchist commune. (2) Why did the Atheist cross the road? There was no chicken, so he didn't. (3) Why did the Catholic cross the road? To get to the other confession.
(4) Why did the Evangelist cross the road? To witness to the chicken. (5) Why did the Hindu cross the road?
To get around the chicken. (6) Why did the Agnostic cross the road? To see whether the chicken was on the other side.
(7) Why did the Jihadist cross the road? To increase the body count on the other side. (8) Why did the physicist cross the road? To see what would happen. (9) Why did the theoretical physicist cross the road?
Because it was his field.
I do recommend that you go through the talk before proceeding in this tweet storm.
The conclusion comes out at the very end. It is the same observation that Christopher Alexander employs in this multiple volume series 'The Nature of Order': amazon.com/Nature-Order-P…
In IT you can be employed for life because the technical debt keeps piling up. The garbage collector analogy is an apt analogy. Nobody wants to do it, so they'll pay people to do it.
The most predictable path to profitability is to create a business collecting other people's garbage. The riskiest business model is to do only the cool things that everyone else wants to do.
Too many startups are fixated only on doing the next cool thing. There's a survival bias that big companies are doing all the cool things. Doing the cool thing is profitable only when you are first to pick the low-hanging fruit.
Here's a map of the US and the delta-variant as of Aug 5. Is there a firewall that can contain the rapid rise of infections coming from the south?
Here's the covid vaccination rate as of July 1. The northeast is bordered by well-vaccinated states (i.e. IL, KY, VA). It will be problematic if there is an outbreak in IN, OH and WV. Reminds me of playing the game of Risk.
So what's going on in FL? It's in the middle of a battle. There's no firewall protecting it from lowvax states like AL. If you look at the map, the intensity of the outbreak in AL is at the border with FL.