Similar results have been seen in several other studies.
While this is framed as benefits of consuming fish or fish oils, the omega-3 index also depends on the consumption of omega-6, abundant in seed oils academic.oup.com/ajcn/advance-a…
Omega-3 index is a measure of the amount of omega-3 in red blood cells
When omega-6 consumption is high, omega-3 index is low
Omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA in tissues decreases with higher omega-6 content
Omega-6 content in tissues increases with increasing consumption of seed oils, and omega-3 index declines
One estimate is that omega-3 index has declined by ~60% during the 20th century due to increasing seed oil consumption
Whenever you say that some allegedly incurable chronic illness was cured by diet, exercise, fasting, or some other natural means, you always see a large contingent of people who insist that's not possible, or that it's really "remission", or that it won't work for everyone.
No one says it will work for everyone.
That can't possibly be an objection to trying it, or trying to spread the word about the possibility of a cure.
By objecting to this, these people are doing serious harm
Because these objections can make people feel they shouldn't try to fix themselves.
Mammary tumorigenesis [in mice] was very sensitive to linoleate [seed oils' main component] intake and increased proportionately in the range of 0.5 to 4.4% of dietary linoleate. cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/45/5/1…
Most Americans consume enough seed oils that they're above a plateau in cancer causation. In other words, they're exposed to the maximum cancer-promoting amount.
This may be why associational studies are inconclusive: almost no one consumes a low level of linoleic acid