What is the role is tax policy in development?

Often people think of tax policy largely as a revenue generating exercise - this is not quite right

A very important element of tax policy is its *design* that shapes incentives and the overall macro balance. Some examples ...
The consolidated tax code should be sufficiently progressive

By consolidated i mean including all taxes - e.g. local, provincial, federal etc.

Progressive means consolidated tax rate should rise sufficiently for wealthier households
e.g. Pakistan collects very low tax revenue as share of GDP, but another problem it has is that it relies excessively on indirect taxes -

various forms of consumption taxes that tend to be very regressive in nature.
Lack of effective progressivity in taxation, both due to poor compliance and poor design, favors extreme inequality that is not conducive for inclusive development
Another element of tax policy is shaping incentives

Many dev countries face the simultaneous problem of climate change and high fossil fuels imports. Carbon tax can shift incentives in favor of alternatives faster and sooner

A nice primer by @MaxCRoser

ourworldindata.org/carbon-price
Another example is urban land taxation

Land needs to be effectively taxed to prevent unproductive "hoarding" and to encourage productive investment

A properly designed land taxation system is in fact sufficient to pay for public infrastructure needs

jstor.org/stable/1884466…
The broader point is that a lot of careful thinking needs to go in the design of tax policy to make sure it delivers at the macro level by shaping incentives and improving overall efficiency

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Atif Mian

Atif Mian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AtifRMian

5 Aug
Is the executive/PM in developing countries constrained by "talent pool" for top leadership positions?

Not really. The market for top talent is global, and as such there is little excuse for incompetence at the top.
One reason for failure to attract competence is environment - it's not about the money: the opportunity to work at the "country level" is super attractive

But executive needs to create the right environment, e.g. delegate properly, that is her job.
The more important reason perhaps is that discovering the right top talent for the right job is a very difficult problem -

this is why there are large "head hunter" firms dedicated for this job.
Read 4 tweets
4 Aug
#1 Appointment and Delegation

Perhaps the most important task of a chief executive, e.g. PM, is that, (a) she appoints the very best people to lead key areas, and (b) delegates proper authority to them
Poor countries need to "build stuff" from the ground up - they are poor precisely because they lack the systems, infrastructure and institutions that are necessary for development

Building this stuff is hard - it requires skills that only a very few typically have
A rich country can afford to appoint incompetent people once in a while because the quality of its systems hedges against incompetence at the top - but a poor country does not have this luxury.

In poor countries, incompetent appointments only perpetuate the cycle of misery
Read 6 tweets
6 May
How important is global capital for growth in developing countries?

Not as much as it is traditionally hyped in theory and practice

The reason?

Global capital is a double-edged sword. Its promise versus its perils must be carefully adjudicated

(thread)
Correlation is not causation, but a useful fact to keep in mind is that developing countries with higher capital inflows tend to have *lower* growth

Countries like China with very low or negative net inflow tend to have the highest growth rate
So should countries just ban capital from coming in?

Of course not.

The key is understanding what kind of capital is healthy versus unhealthy for the economy

kind of like figuring out healthy versus unhealthy food for the body
Read 9 tweets
23 Mar
Today's question for #WhyStudyEconomics

Should we provide relief to debtors when there is a recession, such as in this pandemic or the housing crisis before that?

The answer illustrates how good economics is about making the sum bigger than its parts
Each debtor has a lender. So providing relief to the debtor means we are taking something away from the lender

Isn't this a zero sum game then?

Why provide relief to the debtor at the expense of the lender?

Economics tells us that this apparently simple logic is incorrect
The reason: In the midst of a recession, demanding an additional dollar from a debtor takes away one dollar from their total spending

But giving the same dollar to the lender does not add this dollar back into total spending, because lenders try to save some portion of it
Read 10 tweets
19 Mar
I'll do occasional thread on #WhyStudyEconomics - explaining how this science can be used for our collective good when used properly

Today's question: Should we have a minimum wage?
Questions in economics are social in nature which can understandably trigger an ideological/emotional response

But one must resist that initial temptation and start with a formal framework to think objectively about the question at hand

This is what theorists try to do
For a question on the minimum wage, we must start with a theory of how labor market works

A theory does not tell us how labor markets *actually* work, but it guides us by spelling out conditions under which a minimum wage is desirable versus not
Read 13 tweets
25 Feb
The administration is reviewing U.S. economic resilience - this is much needed

Why is it necessary? And how should one do it?
Resilience => ability to absorb "shocks" such as disruptions in microchips or bursting of a bubble without major layoffs

An inability to do so is very costly. This study by @ojblanchard1 @LHSummers & Cerutti shows that short-run losses often become more permanent Image
So how can we make the U.S. economy more resilient?

There are two sides to it (as always)

The supply-side and the demand-side

The administration is currently focusing on the supply-side
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(