The public debate about #disinformation, influence operations and responses… is lacking scrutiny & real debate over rapidly developing defence policies and military responses, esp on ethics. If only public expert discussions got as focused in the weeds on this as on #BigTech.
What discussions do happen seem to be driven my ex-military personnel and very focused on the ‘how to’ of understanding enemies and developing messages and targeting etc… as usual.
People badly need to start to care about this.
It genuinely seems like most of the experts who don’t study the military and who are calling for more national security responses, don’t actually know much about what militaries do, or the rules that govern it or changing practises and the risks of failing to debate them.
And I’m not sure most of the disinformation focused community actually wants to engage with it let alone having relevant expertise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DЯ ΞMMΛ Γ BRIΛИT 📚🐶🧡

DЯ ΞMMΛ Γ BRIΛИT 📚🐶🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmmaLBriant

7 Aug
It upsets me so much to think that people watched these updates & failed to call a doctor, failed to call an ambulance. Now media share them to the already convinced -do anti-vaxxers even see these? Are they persuaded by the subtle victim shaming, in the face of national tragedy?
It’s exploitative, most of them aren’t framed in a way that they would actually connect with a persuadable leaning anti-vaxxer. I’m sick of seeing them. It feels wrong.
If you’re going to share something like this as a journalist or someone with an influential account the least you should be doing is trying to frame it in such a way that it’s a compassionate appeal to convince that audience. Few are.
Read 4 tweets
5 Aug
My doctors insisted on an ambulance in February because I couldn’t breathe properly and they couldn’t examine me because of covid restrictions. I insisted I was fine and was *terrified* I’d be hit with a bill like this, they sent one anyway. Just to check my vitals.
the most horrifying thing was all I needed was someone to listen to my chest and the doctor’s refused… they said if you might need an x-Ray this is what they do here. You can’t just have your doctor book an appointment at the hospital to get an x-Ray the way you can in the UK...
Turned out it was spending all my time indoors with Tozi when I have a dog allergy and all I needed was a hepa filter. Two fire trucks turned up! It was SO embarrassing. 🤦‍♀️
Read 5 tweets
1 Aug
This misleading propaganda website by @ukhomeoffice which hides its source and aims to deter asylum seekers seems to also raise questions of compliance with UK data law. I recently FOIA’d the @ukhomeoffice on compliance: whatdotheyknow.com/request/726991…
Here is the recent story on the misleading covert propaganda site independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
They claim to be compliant with data law… now I’m wondering if this was correct @GeorgeChiesa @RaviNa1k sadly they refused my request for docs on grounds of time/quantity. I will follow up on this…
Read 4 tweets
31 Jul
All the articles telling us big data driven AI was now going to save us after all and we had to get over pre-covid privacy worries. During digital dependency we need privacy more than ever.
There are many ways data can help us but not without careful regulations that make sure it’s protected, safe, effective and for the public good… not just a bunch of companies capitalising on crisis.
“In the end, many hundreds of predictive tools were developed. None of them made a real difference, and some were potentially harmful”
Read 4 tweets
25 Jun
Political Communication departments please when you are writing your recruitment ads and planning your futures can you try and keep a little open minded? Always you specify scholars who use quantitative methods, data analytics and surveys focused on understanding public 1/
opinion and political behavior… you ask for people studying power by focusing only on the powerless - some of us take a normative position that marginalised communities & indeed the public in general get researched and poked and prodded and experimented on to understand what 2/
makes them tick A LOT already… because we are visible - while powerful people and systems they use to control are not in focus and remain under researched because they are difficult to study and opaque. 3/
Read 5 tweets
24 Jun
Important outcome of the Canadian domestic influence scandal last summer…. 👇
As a reminder here are my two articles which were important to reporting on the unfolding events... Thanks again for @davidpugliese amazing reporting and for picking up on what I discovered and sharing it with Canada! occrp.org/en/blog/13225-…
My opinion piece in the Ottawa Citizen ottawacitizen.com/news/national/…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(