1/ I’m in #Crypto because I believe it’s an incredible, uniting force for good, and our best chance to solve problems that otherwise seem to rip our society apart. This past week reinforces my belief.
2/ We're just starting to see its ability to unite across party lines. Not just to strike a “deal” (like in the infra bill generally), but uniting in belief that #Crypto is a powerful force for good.
3/ Several Senators showed great courage @RonWyden @SenToomey @CynthiaMLummis and were joined by @senrobportman @MarkWarner @SenatorSinema @ossoff and @tedcruz
4/ Uniting across party lines continued on twitter. @novogratz I saw you support @tedcruz! .
5/ The trend of unifying across party lines will continue and accelerate. Crypto is a stronger uniting force than current party lines, especially as we continue to #Buidl our vision.
6/ Democrats and Republicans will increasingly come together on #Crypto:
7/ Many Democrats are trying to solve big problems that require collective action; many Republicans want to solve the same problems, but object to doing so through coercive collective action by the government.
8/ #Crypto is special. It has, and will, let us dramatically scale the ability of people to coordinate and cooperate to solve massive problems. And it will do so via constructs that are fundamentally consensual (not coercive).
9/ Before #Crypto , large scale coordination required one or more central intermediaries with some type of controlling market power. These controlling operators could be tech companies, government agencies, etc.
10/ These controlling operators generally extract more value than they add via various costs: eg, taxes, fees, user lock-in and high switching costs, higher prices, and the presence of single points of failure, censorship risk, barriers to innovation, and reduced privacy.
11/ Worse, these systems generally aren’t suited to evolve effectively in ways to solve big, public problems. When solving big problems, you never get it “right” at first, if ever. You have to continually iterate and evolve.
12/ But with pre-#Crypto systems, companies evolve to maximize shareholder value, and government programs evolve through messy processes that often elevate political virtue over all else (like we've been witnessing over the last week).
13/ While both systems may work for some problems, they don’t necessarily for the biggest, most enduring and public problems. Crypto is a uniquely liberty- and consent-based, collective action machine. This will become increasingly apparent to everyone.
14/ FUD will come, but we will build faster and achieve more. The skeptics will convert or become increasingly irrelevant as #Crypto as a force for good spreads to more and more people.
15/ I’m busy #buidling so I can’t write as much as I'd like, but, in the meantime, here are some resources for people who are newer to #Crypto and want to start learning more:
16/ This is a good article on the “economics of blockchain” and how it can enable greater coordination and cooperation, by @ccatalini and @joshgans cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020…
17/ @twobitidiot is a great follow and just shared a perspective similar to what I'm sharing here:
18/ @VitalikButerin is the original visionary behind #ETH, which is powering so much of the innovation in #Crypto as a base cooperation and settlement layer.
19/ @ethereumJoseph (my boss) has devoted his life and countless $$ to giving myself and so many others a chance at making the vision I'm describing here a reality.
20/ There are many great “DeFi” visionaries, and I enjoy the takes from @haydenzadams @StaniKulechov @RuneKek, along with my colleagues @LexSokolin and @corbpage
/21 @danfinlay (another colleague) and @tayvano_ are second-to-none on empowering and keeping people safe with non-custodial #Crypto, which is a key aspect of realizing our vision.
/22 On legal and policy matters, some of the best follows include my colleagues @MattCorva @BillHughesDC as well as @NYcryptolawyer @jerrybrito @valkenburgh @jchervinsky @awrigh01 @colleenklein @dcsilver @lex_node and @RonwHammond
/23 @jack will be a great follow when learns about #ETH. 😉
/24 There are many more great follows, and I’m sure I’m missing ppl -- sorry! Feel free to add more resources for the new folks below. Now, onward and upward!
Ah shoot, and @CaitlinLong_!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Berarducci

Patrick Berarducci Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PatBerarducci

3 Apr 19
0/ Yes, I may write more, but I mostly agree with @MattCorva. The SEC's rules still aren't as clear as places like Singapore, UK, and France, but I'm hopeful this will still give law firms, projects, investors, and customers sufficient clarity to start doing business again.
1/ Overall, on a quick read, I didn't see any big surprises. I think the SEC continues to signal that it supports the creation and distribution of consumer utility tokens consistent with the principles we've been talking about @TheBKP_Official and @ConsenSys.
2/ For example, things like the @TheBKP_Official's consumer token framework (thebkp.com/s/consumer-tok…) and tools like "proof of use," which are helpful for having a successful launch by accomplishing objectives of the SEC and seeding strong user basis for new products.
Read 12 tweets
25 Feb 19
0/ #CO is poised to join #WY in providing safe harbor from securities laws for consumptive tokens. #MT also introduced a similar bill. I want to highlight why I think this is important and what points I hope the SEC considers as it prepares additional guidance.
1/ This legislation builds on a core idea from #WY: It must be possible for entrepreneurs to develop and sell software that is inherently consumptive in nature (i.e., not a passive financial instrument and intrinsically is for use/consumption) w/o implicating securities laws.
2/ The SEC seems to agree and so have regulators/policymakers in just about every other developed nation. The difficulty arises, however, in defining the boundaries of this principle - stated differently, when if ever is usable software actually a security?
Read 28 tweets
23 Jan 19
0/ My thoughts after a quick read of @TheFCA just-issued consultation paper “Guidance on Cryptoassets,” including a comparison to the US securities laws:

fca.org.uk/publication/co…
1/ First, I notice that@TheFCA uses “cryptoasset”, which should make @cburniske happy.
2/ But there’s lots more to make everyone in the industry happy. It’s a great sign that @TheFCA recognizes the importance of clearly articulating the regulatory boundaries for cryptoassets — e.g.:
Read 25 tweets
15 Dec 18
1/ A few weeks ago, Chairman Clayton explained explained token sales with an analogy to buying tickets to a Broadway play. This was interesting because it reminded me of a NYAG report on the event ticket industry, which struck me as having some similarities to token sales.
2/ Here’s the report (ag.ny.gov/pdfs/Ticket_Sa…) and here are some highlights:
3/ The majority of tickets aren’t reserved for public sale. They are distributed in “presales” or to various “insiders”:
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(