#JesseSingal, true to form, keeps hammering his list of requested corrections on all doors.
Do others remember when he copied his lawyer in an email and said it was certainly not a legal threat? Now he says someone saying corrections might appear “Soon…” is “ominous.” 🙃
So no, dear outraged Jesse, it is not “profound sloppiness” and it does not “exhibit complete unfamiliarity” when one repeats what is widely established in the accompanying research and discussion.
The angry nerve of this man.
I hope someone can find it amusing.
PS: Waiting patiently for @JesseSingal to write a thread about how I obviously have absolutely no idea what I’m writing about in the above tweets as I’ve exhibited the extreme sloppiness of having typed “DSM-V” instead of “DSM-5.” 😆
Oh, what pleasure. #JesseSingal demonstrating for us, yet again, how he reads. Take research article. Find a sentence about gender that enrages you. Dismiss the whole thing on the basis of that and malign the authors. Presto!
What's the next Jesse Singal defender going to say in reply? If you're a reply guy out of ideas, here are some options:
1. You know full well that binary sex is not just a Western concept! Or are you being willfully obtuse?
2. That Jesse says it's a red flag doesn't mean he's dismissing the whole piece. What are you? A Dr. who can't read?
3. I saw the pronouns in your bio. Huge red flag! You're not expecting me to take you seriously, are you?
4. When Jesse says that someone should not take the authors seriously does not mean that he's ENDORSING the maligning of these authors. But you, with your totalitarian mindset, can't see that, can you?
Have at it, dudes!
😂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's trace the self-alleged non-political cabal at play here. A cabal trying to change current principles of gender-affirmative care for trans youth. While conducting no original research of their own.
May I introduce, Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM). 1/
Mostly they lobby for "evidence-informed healthcare" for "children, adolescents, and young adults with gender dysphoria."
If you believe a society with that narrow a focus doesn't have very particular political goals, you must be freshly born. 2/
They made a bibliography to show that evidence for gender dysphoria treatments is "of very low quality" and that they are very concerned for gender-dysphoric youth.
They filed an amicus brief to challenge WPATH on mastectomy for adolescents.
This part of #ColinWright's interview went on for quite a bit: he made his own example of not landing a TT job evidence for how rotten he thinks academia is. But he didn't mention once that his supervisor & co-author was a fraudster & that those co-retractions dragged him down.
“'Due to legal concerns (Pruitt obtaining lawyers) I have been advised not to issue any comments on this until the investigation surrounding Dr. Pruitt has finished,' #ColinWright, who co-authored several papers with Pruitt, tells ScienceInsider."
#ColinWright, #Quillette editor: "Being trans is just a state of mind. . .you can't empirically verify it in any way."
I know we didn't really need any more confirmation. But here it is.
When asked about his previous identification as a progressive, this is how he defines it: "I was pro the gay rights movement, and yeah, for sure."
Yep. Progressive. When you support legal and political changes that have just happened and without any of your participation.
#ColinWright about non-binary identity: "It's common but I still don't think people know what they're talking about when they say it. . .Just ask anyone of this ideology about what is a woman, and you just get insanity back."
Then he says "insanity" at least three more times.
"The same evolutionary & biological processes that. . .result in a shorter average lifespan for men than women also contribute to the sex differences in economic outcomes (e.g., annual income) & political participation." #Quillette authors
I'm reading this Shrier piece--follow Merkin's link if you're curious--and an obvious pattern is this.
#AbigailShrier reports with benevolence and understanding on these children's disabilities and mental health struggles UNLESS it's gender dysphoria.
She has detailed paragraphs to build good will from readers based on how supportive she is (and the parents she portrays are) in relation to a child's or teenager's autism, eating disorder, suicidal ideation, self-harm, insomnia, anxiety, depression, PTSD.
Just yesterday I wrote a wee theoretical thread on the concept of good faith. And today, I receive the apposite gift of the arguer who knows to smile in good faith while trying to stab you at the same time.
Here are some fun aspects of the pattern.
1. Asks questions that sound serious and and at first curious and sincere, but that only ever end up requiring extra work of you while he is never offering any work of his own (beyond the well-trained talking points that are the basis of his questions).
2. When you’re not immediately forthcoming with the work he asked for, the questions will turn nasty. Can’t you answer? Here’s another question. Can’t you answer that either? Are you not capable of it? What are you, a fraud?