[Thread] 1/ This thread is on Qatar's long-awaited upcoming Shura elections, and manipulation on the hashtag 'elections for the Shura council'. I analyzed around 18000 interactions involving around 8600 unique accounts. #disinformation#deception
2/ The sample is from the last two days, and generally encompasses the majority of activity on the hashtag. (Of course the presence of manipulation doesn't discount any of the important issues being raised about electoral fairness and inclusion, but I am focusing on manipulation)
3/ Firstly. There is clear, unequivocal manipulation going on. If you look at the network graph below, it shows a large hub of accounts (green block), along with a separate pinkish constellation. The pinkish constellation shows an account being retweeted hundreds of times. Now..
4/ that is not unusual in of itself. But you'll notice 2 things.
1) The constellation is separate, meaning it's not well integrated with the more interactive community
2) I coloured edges by what app those accounts are using to tweet. In this case all those already separate
5/ accounts are tweeting using the same application, in this case, Twitter Web App, or the browser application, which is more often used for manipulation than say Android or iPhone. Once you look at the accounts too, you realise they are sockpuppets. Some examples coming up>
6/ Here is an Iraqi Westlife fan based in KSA.Only she's not, the account probably belonged to a British girl. Indeed the account was not scrubbed properly and the previous owner even posted a photo from 2014 of a surprise bday for a friend at Alton Towers (theme park in England)
7/ Also there's @billybumcrack ! aka, Fatima AlShaybani. He thinks Beady Eye are 'wank' but liked Oasis when Liam Gallagher was in the band. He's also really into the Shura Council elections. Guessing he is British. #disinformation#Qatar
8/ I could go on. You know how many of these sockpuppet accounts are in this cluster alone. Around 925! That's a lot. Whoever runs them has put their location as 'KSA', presumably as that's the target market/region. So who are they retweeting in this case? #disinformation
9/ Well they were retweeting Mubarak Al Yafei, an Emirates based media persona, a verified account, although the link in the bio goes to a suspended webpage - suspended due a lack of verification (so far). The tweet in question has since been deleted but you can see text below
10/ There are other suspicious clusters too. If you see below. Another account is boosting the elections hashtag, but as you can see it as a marketing/spam account. However, the tweet has around 630 retweets, almost all from fake accounts or hacked accounts. #disinformation
11/ It is also important to note that the aforementioned Mubarak Al Yafei is statistically the most influential tweeter in the network folowed by Qattar_Affairs, Kuwarimud and others. Interesting that Turkey affairs is also in there - Turkey Affairs is a sort of anti Erdogan
12/ anti-Qatar current regime account. I am not sure about Qattar Affairs - but it could be related? Anyway the dominant influential accounts are pushing a critical narrative about Qatar's elections, most notably about the exclusion of certain members of the Al Marra tribe.
13/ Many of the accounts appear to be UAE influencers or purportedly Saudi-based sock puppet accounts. Some are unattributed opposition accounts. Either way, at least 14% of the accounts active on the hashtag 'Elections for Shura Council" are sockpuppets/fake accounts #disinfo
14/ Anyway, that's it for now. What we are seeing is clearly external accounts jumping on and artificially amplifying a legitimate issue in order to distort and dominate the narrative, muddying the waters of facts and productive discussion. Classic Gulf Twitter #disinformation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection
73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.
Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week