I am an admirer of Modi.
But can’t buy this argument that : question only Mamta for WB violence
Get it embedded that controlling violence is primary duty of any government (Center & State).
There is no use of Constitution & bla if loss of life is just a “Khela”.
But can’t buy this argument that : question only Mamta for WB violence
Get it embedded that controlling violence is primary duty of any government (Center & State).
There is no use of Constitution & bla if loss of life is just a “Khela”.
And in case people wish to be peachy upon me, they should know I did write a book on subject “Why Modi is right for India?”
So I am totally aware of the arguments which you might bring & actually have criss arguments too for all.
So I am totally aware of the arguments which you might bring & actually have criss arguments too for all.
It is important to question the state (Indian), if you want to avoid it to keep living in la land that everything is fine.
And yes, yet I believe “Modi is aware that Muslim votes don’t matter to him.”
He knows it, hence I don’t consider “him” to be appeaser.
And yes, yet I believe “Modi is aware that Muslim votes don’t matter to him.”
He knows it, hence I don’t consider “him” to be appeaser.
The democracy of BJP has come out as one of the worst weakness for it.
Most of the members even don’t have clue that why they are with BJP.
Many might not have read even a single page of Golwalkar or Savarkar!
Most of the members even don’t have clue that why they are with BJP.
Many might not have read even a single page of Golwalkar or Savarkar!
I want “ #ModiAgain “ but the attitude of apologists would bring more & more problem to party.
Bengal, UP, Bihar are most important states which would define 2024 Elections.
Of course, I can debate upon the policies, minority etc for Govt but WB is non-negotiable.
Bengal, UP, Bihar are most important states which would define 2024 Elections.
Of course, I can debate upon the policies, minority etc for Govt but WB is non-negotiable.
West Bengal was a case-study.
Mamata indeed was successful in portraying BJP as "Pro-Muslim Party" in place of Hindu Majority.
You need to understand that with the given politics of past, "education" has not been penetrated well within masses.
Mamata indeed was successful in portraying BJP as "Pro-Muslim Party" in place of Hindu Majority.
You need to understand that with the given politics of past, "education" has not been penetrated well within masses.
She was able to play the game.
When education is not well penetrated, symbolism becomes the tool to lure you.
Mamata used following very boldly:
1)Center's Minority Scheme
2)Modi's good relations with Muslim Countries
When education is not well penetrated, symbolism becomes the tool to lure you.
Mamata used following very boldly:
1)Center's Minority Scheme
2)Modi's good relations with Muslim Countries
She did reflect in Hindu areas that BJP has done nothing for Hindus & Babri was just one way of them to get launched in politics.
NRC of Assam was a great ploy for her too.
The lack of education & the TMC infiltration in BJP did add more menace.
NRC of Assam was a great ploy for her too.
The lack of education & the TMC infiltration in BJP did add more menace.
When BJP should have focused on symbolic Knowledge Passage too, they badly failed here.
Those infiltrators from TMC did ensure that "not what is required is done in the name of preparation for elections."
Those infiltrators from TMC did ensure that "not what is required is done in the name of preparation for elections."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
