I have to say I was pleasantly surprised by this morning's redistricting criteria hearing.
Either NCGA staff was lying when they said a lot of people had already signed up before public sign up info was released, and that Sen. Newton's LA was collecting those signups (a statement that many others heard, including more-level-headed-than-me @JBremerDevt)
Or legislative leadership decided it wasn't a good look to pack the place with loyalists, and so decided to let the people online who signed up using the public link speak instead
Either way, out of the 22 speakers, 20 spoke in favor of fairer maps, and half of those came to @allontheline_nc s rapid response training last night!
@allontheline_nc I was so encouraged by that and so thankful to everyone who came out this morning. Really and truly, it warmed my heart and made my day, especially considering what I was expecting.
@allontheline_nc But I was also sobered by the fact that many more who don't live near Raleigh, and can't take off time from work or home responsibilities to testify at 8:30am, were not able to have their voices heard.
@allontheline_nc If this is you, don't despair. Online comment is still open and if you can submit a redistricting criteria vote by tomorrow night before the vote you should!
@allontheline_nc If you don't know anything about redistricting criteria, or how to write an effective comment, no worries. You can watch our training here:
@allontheline_nc They aren't ready for us. We're going to be more organized, more focused, more knowledgeable and energetic and determined than they can possibly handle <3
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here at joint House and Senate Redistricting for the discussion and vote on redistricting criteria #ncpol
Apparently there are a bunch of amendments that aren't yet ready for discussion, so the committee will go at ease until 9:15am
We're being pushed back until 10am. Apparently all amendments are from Dems - I'm actually a little bit surprised considering how vague / unfinished the proposed criteria seem.
So, there's this mockery of a public hearing - but what about the proposed redistricting criteria themselves? Well, you can watch our training here:
But if you missed that / don't have time to watch, I'll walk through the criteria in this thread:
First of all, here's a link to the document containing all of the proposed criteria: ncleg.gov/documentsites/…
The chairs might have told you they're the same as in 2019, but they're actually quite different and much, much more vague.
I'm going to skip over Equal Population, Contiguity, and Counties, Groupings, and Traversals because those are all mandated specifically by the constitution or court precedent and are therefore always the same.
Yesterday, before the 3:30pm Redistricting Committee meeting we were told by NCGA staff that "a lot of people" were already signed up to speak this morning at the public hearing on criteria.
How is this possible if the sign up firm didn't go public until after 4pm? #ncpol
The obvious implication is that Republican leadership of the committee had released this information to selected people well before it came public, effectively filling up most if not all of the 60 speaking slots with their ideological compatriots.
This is further substantiated by the fact that we were also told by staff that it was Sen. Paul Newton (co-Chair of the committee) whose legislative assistant was the one who collected the names of speakers before the public sign up was released.
Here at the Legislative Office Building waiting for the 3:30pm joint House and Senate Redistricting Committee to get started. Today they're supposed to discuss these proposed criteria: ncleg.gov/documentsites/…
Sen. Daniel is presiding. He says there will be 60 speaking slots tomorrow morning during the two hour hearing starting at 8:30am. We still have gotten no idea how people can sign up to speak.
This is what we heard off hand but there's been no official announcement:
Ran over to Campbell Law School just in time for the discussion on the plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction request in the Congressional partisan gerrymandering case #ncpol#NCGA
One thing that's clear from the plaintiffs opening statement - this case is, if anything, *stronger* than the one against the legislative districts
.@mel_bough is actually live tweeting this. I'll probably just be making comments here and there
The bill they're talking about here, #H140, that is starting to lose Democratic support, is the same one that the legislative defendants just cited Art Pope as having endorsed when offering him as a gerrymandering referee.
If you don't know who Art Pope is, he's the North Carolina Republican mega-donor behind the GOP REDMAP effort that led to maps that have been found to be both partisan *and* racially gerrymandered by multiple courts.
Now, I wouldn't trust any redistricting reform bill that Art Pope endorsed. As the Common Cause trial showed, #NCGA Republican leadership has acted in bad faith at every turn on this issue. Even now in offering Pope as "referee" they're basically trolling the court.