New season VAR / refereeing changes thread No. 3:
HANDBALL

- Attacking handball changes
- Defending handball roll back

Shorter for this final thread of three.
Attacking handball:

A goal will now only be ruled out if the ball hits the arm/hand of the goal scorer and he scores immediately.

But intent still doesn't matter.

If the ball accidentally hits the hand/arm of one player, and he passes to a teammate to score, the goal stands.
In 2019-20, 14 goals were disallowed for attacking handball.

Following the tweak last summer, only 5 goals were disallowed in 2020-21.

Under the new interpretation, only 2 of those 5 goals would have been ruled out for attacking handball. Let's take a look at those two.
Example 1.
Callum Wilson, Liverpool vs. Newcastle

The ball popped up and hit Wilson on the arm, the ball ran through towards goal and he scored. This would still be ruled out.

65 seconds
Example 2.
Timo Werner, Chelsea vs. Leicester

Ball goes into the net off Werner's arm, this goal would also still be disallowed.

40 seconds
And two examples of goals that would now count.

Example 1.
Aymeric Laporte, Tottenham v Man City

Handball by Gabriel Jesus, before the ball runs to Laporte who scores.

Example 2.
Josh Maja, Fulham v Tottenham

The ball inadvertently hits the arm of Mario Lemina, drops to Maja who scores. This would now count.

85 seconds
NB: *Deliberate* handball in the attacking phase is a separate offence. New interpretation only applies to accidental handball.

So Mo Salah's goal vs. Spurs, ruled out for deliberate handball by Roberto Firmino on halfway, still ruled out.

55 seconds
On the definition of immediacy, the player should score almost straight away. If there's a dribble, that is unlikely to be judged as immediate.

Last season, Mason Greenwood's goal vs. Leicester stood after accidental handball by Amad Diallo, as he did not immediately assist.
Now to defensive handball, which has essentially reverted to where it was in 2019.

The IFAB has basically given us two seasons of total confusion. And the problem is that expectations over what is handball have already been altered.
In short, if a player has their arm close to their body, it's highly unlikely they will be penalised for handball.

Arm must be outstretched, or creating a barrier in an unexpected position.

Position of the arm in relation to the player's movement/action key in all decisions.
However, there will still be decisions which divide fans.

The penalty conceded by Leeds' Robin Koch at Liverpool would still be given. Even though there was a deflection off his body, as his arm was out creating a clear barrier to goal.
The penalty conceded by Wolves' Max Kilman against Leicester should not be awarded, as the defender's arm is in an expected position for his body movement.

Proximity is also key on this one - but a player's actions can be more important than proximity.
I can't find the example I wanted from the Prem, so I'll used this from the Europa League.

Even though the ball hits Paul Pogba at close proximity, the way he slides in puts himself at risk of handling the ball. Would be given in Prem.

80 seconds
Also removed is the automatic offence for the ball hitting the arm above the shoulder.

So Eric Dier would not concede this penalty.

An arm above the shoulder is still considered high-risk but should only be penalised if not in relation to a player's movement, such as jumping.
To conclude, some examples from last season of what should and shouldn't be a penalty for handball.

Penalty kicks:
- Furlong vs. Palace
- Pieters vs. Arsenal (admitted mistake not to award)
- Yokuslu vs. Brighton
- Ndidi vs. Arsenal
Penalty kicks:
- Robinson vs. Fulham
- Bartley vs. Burnley (admitted mistake not to award)
- Cash vs. Southampton (admitted mistake not to award)
- Kamara vs. Liverpool
Not penalty kicks:
- Sterling vs. Southampton
- Cooper vs. Arsenal
- Kante vs. Liverpool
- Matip vs. Leicester
New season VAR changes thread No. 1:
OFFSIDE REVAMP

Can be found here:
New season VAR / refereeing changes thread No. 2:
SOFT FREE-KICKS AND PENALTIES

Can be found here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

10 Aug
New season VAR / refereeing changes thread No. 2:
SOFT FREE-KICKS AND PENALTIES

- What's a "soft" free-kick / penalty
- Ethos behind it
- Influence of Euro 2020
- Examples of so-called "soft" penalties
- Issues with implementation / VAR
- Unlikely to be a smooth ride
The change comes after meetings between PGMOL and clubs, players, managers, coaches and the Football Supporters' Association.

Also included a survey among fans to find out how they envisage games being refereed.

This, along with learnings from Euro 2020, shaped the thinking.
Mike Riley said he wants to "allow Premier League games to flow and that means the refereeing team, both as referee and as VAR, don't intervene for the trivial offences.

"Let's create a free-flowing game, where the threshold is slightly higher than it was last season."
Read 33 tweets
9 Aug
New season VAR changes thread No. 1:
OFFSIDE REVAMP

- The key differences & how it works
- Why it won't be as quick as Euro 2020
- How it will cut the number of disallowed goals
- Why there will still be "marginal" disallowed goals
For the past two seasons, the Premier League has calculated offside to the millimetre.

But the technology, and how it's applied, isn't capable of making an accurate decision to the millimetre.

Now, the PL will adopt the methodology brought in by UEFA last season (UCL, Euros).
Last season, 1mm lines were used to make all decisions.

The TV broadcast lines gave viewers the final image, but the decision was actually made off narrower lines.

Here you see the black, 1mm attacking line being placed. (yellow is finalised defensive line).
Read 20 tweets
13 Jul
Euro 2020 is done and dusted, which is the proper time for a VAR thread to assess how it was operated.

Even so, you have to remember Euro 2020 is basically just 5 rounds of domestic league action (51 games).

For that reason, you can only really make summary judgements.
1. The refereeing was so much better

It certainly was, though of course it should be at a major tournament that is officiated by all the best referees from across Europe.

But this isn't only down to the referees, it's also down to head of refs, Roberto Rossetti.
While the Laws of the Game set the framework, the actual application of the laws still comes down to guidelines issued.

It's clear Rossetti's refereeing guidelines for Euro 2020 were to allow games to flow, that refs should ignore players trying to "win" decisions.
Read 23 tweets
17 May
It's Monday VAR thread time, which has turned out to be more detailed than I originally planned.

- West Brom vs. Liverpool
- Chelsea vs. Leicester

Wasn't much else to discuss across the weekend, really...
Starting with the free kick Mike Dean gave to Liverpool, which led indirectly to Mo Salah's goal. Only the referee can answer this for you.

The referee is part of the game so it shouldn't be a free kick, and the ball didn't hit him so it shouldn't be a dropped ball. 🤷‍♂️
Let's dissect the disallowed West Brom goal, which would have given them a 2-1 lead.

Obviously, some see this as controversial. And giving offside against a player who doesn't play the ball is, by its nature, a subjective aspect of the offside law.

Read 19 tweets
26 Apr
It's your Monday VAR thread, looking at:

- Fabian Balbuena red card
- Callum Wilson handball (and reference to Luke Shaw)
- Arsenal penalty
- The little-known subjective element of offside

As usual, don't shoot the messenger.
Let's start with Fabian Balbuena, it's just a really VAR intervention.

Referee Chris Kavanagh isn't blameless of course, but as I said with the Tomas Soucek red card vs. Fulham it's the VAR, Peter Bankes, who is the gatekeeper.

I've talked several times about referees lacking confidence as VARs, almost second guessing against their own vast experience and judgement.

This seemed the case here, with the VAR watching the incident so many times he convinced himself something was there that wasn't.
Read 25 tweets
23 Apr
Arsenal win this game with a different VAR. And that's the problem with the current offside process, that many don't realise.

There's a key subjective element that means a different VAR doesn't draw the lines on the penalty (or on Everton's goal) because it's too close.
The case for the prosecution. Both these offside decisions were done by the same VAR.

They would not happen with every VAR. ImageImage
This is why the upcoming semi-automated offside is going to be so, so, so crucial.

It will remove all the subjectivity of the VAR plotting points on players. And it will transform the fan experience.

espn.co.uk/football/blog-…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(