I really dislike listing out ethical issues with PDA, pointing out what it should be doing. Where autism research & practice is. Where PDA research & practice is. It is rather depressing.
Example: I simply should not be able to write this:
I have a COI for advocating for DAP to be a common Disorder.
Clearly those advocating for DAP to be a form of autism have a COI.
I have a COI for advocating for DAP to be a common Disorder.
Clearly those advocating for DAP to be a form of autism have a COI.
E.g., Francesca Happé was committee that set DSM-5 autism criteria (Happé 2011).
Is aware that all attempts to autism have failed (Happé 2011; Fletcher-Waton & Happé 2019; Happé & Frith 2020).
Is aware that all attempts to autism have failed (Happé 2011; Fletcher-Waton & Happé 2019; Happé & Frith 2020).
Is not mentioned anywhere in their DAP articles… despite it would make it harder to view DAP as a form of autism.
Articles often have high engagements scores & one poor quality study has won an award for best paper in 2019 (ACAMH 2019).
Articles often have high engagements scores & one poor quality study has won an award for best paper in 2019 (ACAMH 2019).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
