That moment when you realise just how dogmatic & pervasive a worldview must be to endlessly pathologise different characteristics of autistic persons. You could probably say it is a pathological tendency (irony is not lost on me).
The sheer ceaselessness of it (habit of pathologising any features seen in autistic persons), is highly disconcerting when you stop to think about it, & its implications. It is used to justify all sorts of poor standards & treatment towards us.
It makes me even more annoyed at the arrogance of "PDA is an ASD" supporters assuming PDA is an ASD due to potential similarities in behaviour presentations. Also that autism understandings will evolve to encompass PDA. Who the hell do they think they are?!?!
The point is, they want to expand autism to include features which are pathologised with deficits.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@DrJudes03@DrJoelSchwartz@PDASociety It is perfectly reasonable when 1) Help4Psychology produce an algorithm that is not representative of broader literature. E.g. see:
@KatyBenson20@PughJoanne ADHD does have social communication issues, often receiving social communication interventions. Also strong case ADHD should be moved into disruptive, impulse-control, & conduct disorders. It was not due to some research (I am unaware of exact details).
@KatyBenson20@PughJoanne Persons most likely to have ODD & Conduct Disorder are those with ADHD (From my understanding).
@KatyBenson20@PughJoanne Also ODD & Conduct Disorder also often have social communication issues & receive interventions for that. PDA maybe social communication issues really is no excuse for it to remain in autism.
That moment when you discover you have been stressing over a deadline, that does not even matter! Avoidable, avoidance of demands!!!!!!!!! Argh!
My response:
PDA as a term, seems not to be mentioned. There are also other issues that it is unethical to favour viewing PDA as an ASD over its other proposed outlooks, when they await direct empirical testing...
Reflecting upon Jonathan Green's talk yesterday about Demand-Avoidance is relational to each other. My thinking has been to separate demands & avoidance to make it reflect transactional understandings of PDA; which we all should be working with.
I am making a subtle but important change to "Demand Avoidance Phenomena", to "Demand-Avoidance Phenomena". I think I will add the hyphen whenever using a "full name" for PDA.
One thing that I recalled is how in Newson's first publication on PDA in 1983, she calls "Pathological demand-avoidance syndrome". There are signs of a transactional perspective being taken, like how roleplay/ fantasy seems to be a coping mechanism.
This is a fundamental reason why I am so annoyed that key "PDA is an ASD" have not tried to investigate if divergent outlooks on PDA are valid. They basically assumed that their own views on PDA are correct & everyone else's is mistaken (& also on autism).
It is so arrogant to only conduct research & advocate for PDA as an ASD, despite the literature being contested, with both evidence & other experts stating PDA is seen outside of autism. Also PDA maybe other things, like an Attachment Disorder.
It is NOT scientific to only conduct research to support one outlook on the topic, such as PDA is an ASD (this has been happening). Researchers should not be favouring any particular outlook over another.
Tomorrow is the PARC PDA event: Understanding PDA. Speaker order is: @milton_damian
Keith Howie.
Jonathan Green.
Break. @FidgetyF_cker. @Richard_Autism (no idea who that is - joke).
Grace Trundle.
Then Round table.
Most/ All the talks should be recorded.
My slides are already added to LSBU's repository & I have a video ready to go on @autimedes based on my talk. I will add the slides to my researchgate on Wednesday (when LSBU slides embargo is lifted).