Justice (Retd.) Goda Raghuram, Justice (Retd.) Prabha Sridevan, Justice (Retd.) Pradeep Nandrajog, Partner at Samvad Partners Harish Narasappa and Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi will discuss, “Justice Delivery: New Frontiers” at the Law & Economics Policy Conference today.
Justice (Retd.) Goda Raghuram, Former Judge of High Court of Andhra Pradesh Former President of CESTAT Former Director, National Judicial Academy, Bhopal is invited to start his address.
Justice Raghuram: I was reflecting what the necessity to have a tribunal is. The critical justifications are: overly elaborate procedures in our Courts, and overburdened Courts.
Justice Raghuram: If you reflect on the broadly shared reasons offered for tribunals judicial or administrative review must positively answer the requirements, why that tribunal is constituted.
Justice Raghuram: A disturbing fact I find particularly in the last decade is that an appeal is created to the SC. You are disabling HC judges of a domain familiarity and expertise. They sit as virgin adjudicator in the highest Court in that domain.
Justice Raghuram: I hope I am wrong about this- one assumption that appears of the executive branch is that you drown the SC in volumes, so that they will not seriously commandeer the considerations of a tribunal.
Justice (Retd.) Prabha Sridevan, Former Judge of the Madras High Court, Former Chairperson of the IPAB (Intellectual Property Appellate Board) starts her address.
Justice Sridevan: AS HC Judges, our only problem is to decide the cases we don’t have to deal with the rest. As a head of a tribunal, I don’t think there is any ministry that I haven’t stepped into- south block or north block, for pay parity for my staff etc.
Justice Sridevan: The growth of tribunals has been haphazard without any plan. As regards speedy disposal, the SC said, “if you cant fill it up, please close them”. I think tribunals have overstayed their welcome.
Justice (Retd.) Pradeep Nandrajog Former Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Former Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court and Former Judge of Delhi High Court begins his address.
Justice Nandrajog: When we say that it is time to wrap up Tribunals, we must remember there is a cry for specialised benches of the Courts itself. So whether you have a specialised bench of the Court or a Tribunal, it is two sides of the same coin.
Justice Nandrajog: We come to the point of adjudication by the specialists- should we have a technical member or a judicial member? Before the economic activity took over in this country, let us not forget, 50% of the civil litigation in this country was revenue related.
Justice Nandrajog: This division that we tend to create is on the belief that a judicial member would bring impartiality, more confidence to the consumer of justice.
Justice Nandrajog: We spoke of transfers. Don’t Courts have transfers? Like Justice Raghuram the problem is not to find the problem, the problem is to find the solution. We only need people with a spine. So firstly, I find no problem in Tribunals.
Justice Nandrajog: We spoke of challenges with infrastructure, there is the same problem with High Courts. As a Chief Justice in certain HCs, we had one steno attached to 2-3 Courts.
Narasappa: I agree with Justice Sridevan and Justice Raghuram, but then I ask what next? I believe this is where our discussion stops. In the last 30 years, in terms of justice delivery, I feel we have not moved forward.
Narasappa: I have a few suggestions. One, the need for technology- the last 15 months have shown that technology has been adopted willingly AND unwillingly by the judiciary.
Narasappa: If you look at appointments to the HC, there is uniformity beyond belief.
If you take one CV of a High Court Judge, you can just take one and just change names and the place of practice.
Tripathi: I have a slightly different approach. We have a problem of numbers. Our adjudicatory mechanism suffers because we do not have enough adjudicators.
Tripathi: there is a question of domain expertise, its importance cannot be overstated. Our bureaucracy is quite an extra ordinary bunch of dedicated people.
Tripathi: The problem is when you have technical members, they become hesitant when faced with juristic principles especially while being bullied by Senior Counsels.
This can be done away with by having a formal introduction to Law.
Justice Raghuram responds to Justice Nandrajog’s opinion: I believe in the mainline courts there is a system of checks and balances. Whereas in tribunals there is no audit of performance.
Justice Sridevan responds to Justice Nandrajog’s opinion: We are talking of two justice delivery institutions. If certain jurisprudence requires specialised knowledge, then you can ask a specialist to help you.
Dr. KP Krishnan hands over the mic to Sunanda Nair, Director of Strategic Planning, INET for concluding remarks. Nair thanks the speakers for the robust discussion before ending the conference.
#BombayHighCourt allows PIL seeking Court’s intervention in Maharashtra Governor Bhagat Singh Koshiyari’s inaction to nominate 12 members recommended by the Maharashtra Council of Ministers to the State Legislative Council.
Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni: We have considered arguments and formed the following issues:
Petition maintainability - answered in affirmative.
Governor discretion under Art 171 r/w Representation of People’s Act
Governor’s duty to speak?
Order: It is not impermissible to read authorisation of Clauses 3 and 5 of Art 171 r/w with Representation of People’s Act respect to governor’s decision on nomination.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by former Karnataka minister & mining baron, Gali Janardhan Reddy, accused in a multi-million illegal mining case(s) seeking permission to visit & stay in the District of Bellary in Karnataka for a period of 8 weeks
Additional Solicitor General Madhavi Divan makes submissions for CBI: He is the beneficiary of the Bribe - it was done to secure his Bail. His conditions for bail should not be diluted. There was a reason as to why this should not happen. He is a very serious threat to witnesses
ASG: He is a person who has been very seriously accused. Due to not acceptance of bribe, that judge died under very serious circumstances, these are all instances that weight against cancellation of any condition imposed
#MadrasHighCourt hears petitions challenging #ITRules2021. Earlier this week, the Court had pulled up the Central govt for delay in filing its counter affidavit in the matter.
Matter is before Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice PD Audikesavalu.
UOI is yet to file a counter-affidavit: NB Joshi informs
ASG R Sankaranayaranan appears for Union of India, tells Court that he received written instructions last night, adds that counter is being prepared, seeks one last chance to file the counter. Adds that matter can be argued as well if Court sees fit
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing pleas filed by Mumbai journalist and a digital news portal challenging recently notified IT intermediary rules of 2021.
Hearing before Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
#DelhiHighCourt farewell reference for Justice RS Endlaw who retires today begins. Track thread for live updates.
The event can be viewed live on YouTube:
Chief Justice DN Patel gives opening address: We have virtually assembled to bid farewell to our esteemed colleague Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw who is demitting office upon superannuation after a distinguished and fruitful career.