Young men who agree more strongly with rigid masculine norms are more likely to: perpetrate violence and harassment, have thoughts of suicide, drink at risky levels, be involved in traffic accidents. Report and fact sheets at jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@JesuitSocialSer@VicHealth
Among men, belief in rigid masculine norms is 20 times more important than demographic variables in predicting the use of violence, 15 x more influential in predicting binge drinking, and 10 x more influential on negative mood. jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@VicHealth@JesuitSocialSer
The impact of conformity to traditional masculine norms on outcomes: depends in part on *which* norm, and *which* outcome. See my commentary on the ‘Man Box’ survey findings, pp. 40-43 of the report here: jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@VicHealth@JesuitSocialSer
How to address the harmful impact of rigid masculine norms? 1) Encourage public discussion. 2) Build workforce capacity. 3) Integrate attention to masculinity in health promotion. 4) Explore how to shift adherence to rigid norms jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@VicHealth@JesuitSocialSer
If the ‘Man Box’ (rigid masculine norms) is unhealthy for men and boys and those around them, what’s the alternative? ‘Healthy masculinities’, based on gender equality, non-violence, respect, empathy, nurturance, etc. They must be ethical, gender-equitable, and inclusive.
In the first report on the Man Box survey (2018), I argued that whatever vision we have for men and boys, it must be a) feminist – based on equality, b) diverse and multiple, and c) non-essentialist. See p. 53 of jss.org.au/wp-content/upl…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A woman who is a domestic violence victim may stay in or return to the relationship with the violent man, for *understandable* reasons. Fear of what he will do if she tries to leave. Loves him. Wants the relationship, but not the violence. Hope that he’ll change. 1/5
For the sake of the children. Financial dependency. Social isolation. Blames herself. Feels powerless. Pressure from others. No means to survive if the relationship ends. Fears of homelessness and poverty. Etc. 2/5
Note that many of these represent the impacts of *the partner’s violence and control*. He may have threatened to harm her, relatives, or the children, pets or property, or to kill himself, if she leaves. Tried to make her feel stupid, hopeless, and responsible for the abuse. 3/5
Naming the problem of male privileging in higher education: Attention has begun to be paid to discrimination against women in higher education but much less attention is being paid to men’s privileging by the structure and culture of those organisations. academia.edu/49987617/Namin…
Male academics / university faculty: Ten Things You Can Do Now to Improve the Climate for Women in Your Department. A useful one-pager. advance.cc.lehigh.edu/sites/advance.…
Gender inequity in academia: Exists across all academic benchmarks, including grants and funding, publishing and citations, service, opportunities to attend professional development and conferences, and leadership opportunities. campusreview.com.au/2021/03/assess…
What has the #MeToo movement achieved? Professor Paula McDonald (QUT) offers a handy 4-page account. Will #MeToo finally galvanise substantial, authentic, longstanding change? #MeToo’s achievements thus far include... 1/4
#MeToo: 1) Has raised public awareness of the scale of violence & harassment where data and the law could not. 2) Has acknowledged that sexual harassment also affects men. 3) Has exposed some of the conditions that promote gender based violence. 4) Power is paying attention. 2/4
#MeToo’s limitations: 1) Has not yet made a dent in some obvious gender gaps in Australia’s laws. 2) Has provoked backlash. 3) May deliver only trickle down justice. 4) Has prompted (baseless) concerns about witch hunts, ‘trial by Twitter’ and a failure of due process. 3/4
A feminist intersectional approach to engaging men in violence prevention 1/7: Men in different social locations have differential access to social resources and social status. Are privileged on some axes of inequality (including gender) and disadvantaged on others.
2/7: Ethnicity and other forms of social difference shape both victimisation and perpetration. E.g., how male perpetrators are treated and viewed is shaped by race/ethnicity. Privileged men’s violence is treated and understood differently from disadvantaged men’s violence
3/7: Violence prevention with *any* group should assume that everyone has culture. Everyone is located in hierarchies of privilege and disadvantage. There are specific cultures of gender and sexuality in every group and community.
Why consent is not enough: In a social context where hurting women is sexy, consent is inadequate for sexual freedom and equality. Our lives are shaped by social-sexual norms that coercing women is sexy, women are commodities to be used by men, hurting women is sexy. 1/5
Some problems: 1) “Consent relies upon the presumption that people will choose in their own self-interest, or at least in ways that does not fundamentally violate their humanity”, and that is not always true. People may consent to things that harm themselves or others. 2/5
2) Consent precludes evaluation of the act ethically or politically, and instead puts the “blame” for the rightness or wrongness of the act on the person suffering it. 3/5
‘Not my experience’: Liberal MPs say they haven’t witnessed sexism. (BUT see my further comments.) smh.com.au/politics/feder…
Men and sexism: Men are less likely than women to recognise both interpersonal sexism (in derogatory statements about women, sexually harassing behaviours, etc.) and institutional forms of discrimination. Drury, in full text here: xyonline.net/sites/xyonline…
Among men, many simply do not recognise, or indeed defend, existing gender inequalities. Men have been shaped by lifetimes in a gender-unequal world, so that sexism becomes normal, taken-for-granted, and invisible. ‘Men Make a Difference’ report p15, here: xyonline.net/content/men-ma…