Texas, from January peaks to latest data:
- COVID hospitalizations down 19.9%
- COVID patients % of capacity down 22.9%
- COVID patients % of all patients down 27.7%
- COVID patients down 21.4%
- COVID ICU patients down 17.2%
- All ICU patients down 11.7%
Since January peaks:
- Texas hospital capacity is down 5.9%
- Total staffed beds down 4.1%
- The total number of available beds is down 15.9%
- The total number of occupied hospital beds, for any reason, is up 1.1%
[Again, COVID-occupied beds: down 19.9%]
RSV is way up, all over, including places with 99% mask adherence:
The good news about all of these non-COVID hospitalizations: RSV in Texas has, perhaps, hopefully, maybe, possibly peaked (or, at least, is forming a peak):
The other good news: it's "completely normal for [hospitals] to have ICU capacities that run in the 80s and 90s [percent range]." They can and do scale up and down their beds with relative ease; laws require hospitals to be able to scale up rapidly. boriquagato.substack.com/p/hysterical-a…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last year in the U.S. broadly and Texas more specifically, some schools were mask-optional. Other schools forced or coerced children to wear them for hours each day, every day, often even outside during exercise.
Forced-mask schools had higher infection rates than mask-optional.
In U.S. schools, staff in forced-mask schools had higher COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates than those in mask-optional schools.
In real-world data, rather than wish-casting, hunches, or theoretical models, forced-mask schools had higher infection rates for both students and staff.
Divided into quartiles, the more school districts were remote rather than in-person in 2020-21, the worse they did on reading and math tests.
In every category of STAAR Test achievement (Masters, Meets, Approaches, or Did Not Meet Grade Level), in every subject, in every grade, the more remote school districts had worse learning loss than the more in-person school districts.
Although there was only one lonely, single, solitary randomized controlled trial on masks in the COVID era (in Denmark), we do have U.S. data from last year.
Turns out, the COVID results were better in mask-optional than in forced-mask schools.
46 days ago, Texas opened "100%" with no statewide mask mandate, 8 days after @GregAbbott_TX announced the new policy.
Blue checkmarks predicted the apocalypse.
It's now undeniably been long enough to declare that the apocalypse did not arrive. Instead, everything is better.
Since March 10th, when Texas reopened 100% with no statewide mask mandate...
✅Cases: DOWN 25.4%
✅Hospitalizations: DOWN 39.1%
✅% of beds used by COVID patients: DOWN 36.6%
✅% of patients that are COVID+: DOWN 35.2%
✅COVID ICU: DOWN 38.8%
✅Deaths through April 11: DOWN 70.4%
Cases (7-day statewide average per day) are:
✅Down 25.4% since Texas reopened 100% without a statewide mask mandate.
✅Down 50.6% since @GovAbbott made his announcement.
It has now been 52 days since @GovAbbott made his announcement that Texas would open on March 10th, "100%," without a statewide mask mandate.
It has been 44 days since Texas reopened 100% with no mask mandates.
The promised apocalypse has apparently been postponed yet again.
COVID-19 "cases," hospital patients, ICU patients, and deaths have all fallen in Texas in the 44 days since Texas opened 100% without a statewide mask mandate.