We might be tempted to feel sympathy for the Afghans who are fleeing the Taliban, but we should not be. For it is all an elaborate game even if not all the participants are quite aware of it.
2. Most Izl@mic countries alternate between an absolute Iz!@mic theocracy like the Taliban rule and a quasi-Iz!@mic rule like the rule by the 'secular government' of Afghanistan which was just ousted.
3. The Iz!@mic theocracy does what it does: implement Shariat ruthlessly. At first it just generates overseas sympathy and the useful idiots in the welfare states and millennial ruled countries start feeling for the ‘victims of repressive regimes’ in countries like Afghanistan.
4. But an Iz!@mic theocracy can never contain by ruling itself. It has to go out. It has to become global. For the goal of all and any Iz!@mic theocracy is to rule the entire world, to convert entire world to Iz!@m and to bring about the Day of the Qayamat.
5. When this happens the terror!sts start rolling out in other countries and start pummeling high towers with planes.
6. The big powers are then compelled to invade and provide ‘stability to the region’. They do sense that the stability stays only while the Western armies stay. But they make a façade of bringing peace in the region by ‘education’, ‘infrastructure’ and ‘strengthening economy’.
7. Iz!@mic theocrats use this time of ‘democracy building’ by creating a narrative of ‘foreign occupation’ and ‘American imperialism’. Hatred for America, the West and every non-Muslim power is fueled in media, academia and art.
8. On the other hand, they let the foreign powers build roads, airports, railway networks and other transportation and armament infrastructure in the country. #AfghanWomen
9. They wait for a few decades for the foreign powers to leave. They know that no one can stay forever in an Iz!@mic land. And no lasting change can be brought in the population until they are Muzl!ms. And take care that no one leaves the fold.
10. As soon as the foreign armies leave, the Iz!@mic country is handed over to them by the common people on a platter. There is nothing shocking in this. The population knew all along this will happen. They were wanting it and preparing for it.
11. But the most dangerous part of this game starts when a power like the Taliban takes over. Not only do they consolidate their country as a fortress of terrorism.
12. They also lead to the mass exodus of anyone who fell on the wrong side of the Shariat and around 2 to 3% of the population is always like this. They are afraid because of sexual crimes most of all but also about their haircuts, their photographs and their songs.
13. This is the population that a power like the Taliban wants to flee the country. For these people are the forward soldiers of Iz!@m, wittingly or unwittingly. These ‘refugees’ bring tears to the eyes of a welfare state citizen.
14. The shots where 300 people are riding a bus, some running behind it; people hanging on the planes, or running after trains; they are showcased to the entire world to generate sympathy in them, sympathy enough to open borders and coffers of the Western countries for them.
15. The Western countries can’t do anything but ‘help’, for elections sake. The countries which tarry are put into line sooner or later. And these ‘refugees’ find new life in the Western countries and they never leave.
16. But only less than 10% of them mingle with the native society of the country of their refuge. Once out of the reach of the Shariat, the virus in them starts demanding the Shariat once again in the Western countries.
17. They might have been Western enough in a land ruled by the Taliban, but they are Izl!@mic enough in the West to marry Christian girls after converting them, to practice racism, misogyny and all other crimes that come with being an Iz!@mic fundamentalist.
And gradually, knowingly or unknowingly they pave way for Iz!@mic rule in the country of their refuge: first in pockets and then in total. And this is how the agenda of Iz!@m is furthered. Once an Iz!@mic land is always an Iz!@mic land.
19. So no matter how many years the West rules in Afghanistan, it will still be Iz!@mic. But the ‘refugees’ who flee to the West and create mini Iz!@mic islands in the West are the frontier soldiers of the same countries that are practicing the Shariat.
20. It is a double game. And the winner is Iz!@m. The loser is the rest of the world
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Twitteracharyas with faux-shastriya concerns obsessing over the word 'Hindutva' need to hold their pseudo-traditional horses a little bit. Not everything new is bad.
2. Hindutva is a very useful word in contemporary world which reinforces the need for Hindu society to be aggressive. Using it doesn't mean one is just being political. Politics is an integral part of life, whether you hate it or love it.
3. I never tire saying that politics follows society and so we shall try to awaken Hindu society first. That doesn't mean we shall completely ignore politics. Those who are up to it shall of course positively engage with it, all the while refraining from depending on it too much.
1. Hindu Kush - The Graveyard of Hindus
It is the land of the Hindu Kush, the mountain range that runs through Afghanistan. The literal meaning of the phrase Hindu Kush is 'Hindu Killer'
2. When the Iz!@mic armies were invading India, so many Hindus were killed in the genocide that the entire valleys ran red with blood. The entire mountain range came to be called as the 'Hindu killer', the place where Hindus are killed.
3. No wonder that land is so deeply disturbed. No wonder this land needs blood. In the backdrop of beautiful mountains and blue skies, the game of blood catches on once again, as the primitive religious urges of the RoP are let loose again on its streets.
1. Some claim that the ‘same DNA’ claim was made to create a bridge with Muslims for Ghar Wapasi by creating a common ground. The intention is legitimate as ways have to be found for reconversion of Muslims too. But the ‘same DNA’ claims will achieve the exact opposite. Read on.
2. The claim of sameness between two groups does create a flow of followers from one group to another. But the group which gains followers is the one which is surer of its identity firstly and absolutely confident of its peculiar distinctness secondly. This group is Muslims.
3. On the other hand, the group which loses followers is the one which is less clear or completely confused about its identity and has no particular vision of the distinctness and superiority of its own group. This group is Hindus.
1. There was scarcely any difference in DNA of the Germans and the British. And yet we know that they have come off against each other in two of the bloodiest wars in history. The point to note is that their differences were only ideological.
2. The differences between Hindus and Muslims are religious, political, ideological, cultural, historical and social. It is NOT about any sort of DNA. Even a flawed understanding of the DNA is irrelevant here.
3. If an attempt is made to refer to the 'Hindu past' of Muslims then it is once again useless. The Muslims are only too aware that once they were Hindus. They called it their past in Jahiliyah, when their idolatrous and erring ancestors worshipped false gods.
1. Vamsee Juluri is an example of what happens when you jump into a social movement with too many personal desires and ambitions. These desires will lead you to expectations from the leaders of the movement or other influential people.
2. These expectations may or may not be fulfilled based on a thousand different factors. The world is not exactly a fair place, seen in one life perspective. And when these desires are not fulfilled, the frustrations build up, resulting in emotional outbursts.
3. Each outburst is crazier & wilder than before. Every time you cross another boundary of public decency and sanity. And when the desires are even greater than that, you cross the final barrier: and go on to the side of the opposition to finally get the attention that you want.
1. The racist hatred against the Brahmins that has become the norm in our society is similar to the hatred against Tutsis by Hutus in Rwanda, leading up to their genocide.
2. This picture is just one eg of how this hatred is becoming decentralized now, percolating to the lowest levels, where violence takes place. We are preparing one segment of our population for a possible genocide in future. And are supposed to tolerate it for 'politics' sake'.
3. As a contrast to this, in my childhood, my grandmother would welcome all Hindus in her house without discrimination but would not let a Muzl!m or a Chr!st!an enter it.