Beware of stupid people and people pretending to be stupid for effect...

Right now, Biden is more concerned with salvaging his popularity than with the disaster his incompetence unleashed. And his narrative janitors are doing their best to mop up the blood he's spilled...
1/
If you think "But Trump invited the bad guys to negotiate at Camp David" or "Trump's deal freed a bunch of prisoners" are some sort of gotcha that put this on Trump, you're dumb or you think your followers are... 2/
There are three ways a war ends. Just three. No more, no less. Three.
1 - Win
2 - Negotiate a peace
3- Lose

3/
We've taken Win off the table. Neither Trump nor Biden nor anyone else is willing to take the time, spend money, and spill the blood to win this war. 4/
To win would require a combination of the Boer War tactic of emptying the country side with the Roman tactic of pretty much killing everyone else. We're just not going to do that, so we won't win against tribesmen who just will not give up. 5/
The next option was negotiate a deal. Trump did that. When you negotiate, you negotiate, so asking them to visit Camp David is hardly some shocking concession. And when wars end with a deal, prisoners go free. What, you think any deal would keep them locked up forever? 6/
Trump made a deal. It called for the Taliban to power share and had us withdraw most forces in May. The Taliban broke the deal. They attacked. But Biden did nothing, except lengthen the withdrawal time. He did not enforce the deal. 7/
Biden also took longer to leave than Trump would have, assuming the ridiculous scenario that Trump would continue with the treaty while the Taliban broke their part and not retaliate. So Biden had MORE time to plan and execute a smooth departure. Yet he didn't. 8/
The last alternative is to lose. Biden chose that option. And so did every jerk who complains that Trump negotiated. Win, negotiate or lose. Pick one. If you disqualify negotiating, and you won't win, that leaves losing. If you're willing to lose, own it, loser. 9/
So, their argument, to the extent that it is an argument and not a cheesy ploy to distract from Biden's disgraceful, disastrous failure, is that Trump tried to negotiate a peace, and the Taliban broke the deal, and so Biden had no choice but to lose. Huh? 10/
Baloney. When you hear dumb/dishonest people trying to confuse the strategy (leave Afghanistan) with the tactics (Trump via enforcing the deal, Biden via cutting and running), you know you're being played or in the presence of an idiot. Maybe both. 11/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Schlichter

Kurt Schlichter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KurtSchlichter

10 Sep
So, does this vaxx fascism win Biden anything politically?

I think it’s yet another bonehead maneuver by the most politically tone-deaf administration since Hoover. 1/
Everybody who is turgid over vaccines has already got them. The vast majority of people who haven’t got vaxxed have a reason, and they’re going to resent being told they have to get one or starve. 2/
Biden will get the support of some portion of people who took the vaccine, mostly lib women, but he had that already. Who is this going to win over to him? What’s the name of the person who says “Yeah, I thought he was a dork before, but now I’m all in?” 3/
Read 9 tweets
18 Aug
Americans are tired of faceless censors and algorithms preventing them from speaking freely…

GOP, how about a fed law that requires major social media companies like Facebook to … 1/
Before censoring, have a senior - really senior) Facebook officer personally (in ink) sign a written, specific, declaration that he/she/xe 1) personally reviewed the material proposed to be censored and determined it violates the TOS, and describe precisely how; and… 2/
And 2) declare the officer personally spoke (by phone) to the individual to resolve the issue before censoring.

Enforce it with lawsuits - per se damages, civil penalties, punitive, attorneys fees. Fed jurisdiction, of course. Yet states could try it too. @Eric_Schmitt
3/
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug
For too long red state conservatives have offered to live and let live with blue state liberals but the blues are evangelical Marxists who cannot allow us to provide a counter example of freedom. 1/
So, no more. We must, by any means necessary, force them to be like us. No quarter. No compromise. 2/
Ban CRT, Marxism and anti-American misinformation. Nationalize big tech and academia and mandate conservatism as their operational ideology. Ban leftist media and entertainment from spreading misinformation.3/
Read 7 tweets
6 Aug
Fun, true story...

We were in Japan for Yama Sakura in Kumamoto in 2002, I think, and after ENDEX we all hopped a bus to visit Nagasaki... 1/
The city was rebuilt, of course. Nothing glowed. We walked Ground Zero - the blast radius was smaller than you probably expect - and ended up at the Nagasaki A-Bomb Museum... 2/
Inside there were a lot of exhibits but not much context. You might get the impression that the peaceful Japanese were straight up chillin' when, for some unknown reason, the USA popped a hot rock on them... 3/
Read 5 tweets
4 Aug
Hey, thanks Kavanaugh and Roberts for showing us why the Federalist Society/institutionalist model is totally bankrupt. Those 2 knew what the Constitution required and refused to do it to "protect the institution." Great job, guys. 1/
See, we were told that we cons should avoid judicial activists and nominate people who would faithfully apply the Constitution as written. But when it got hard, the Federalists Bros didn't do that. They folded to avoid conflict. We were told to suck it up. 2/
"We must preserve the integrity of the institution," they huffed and puffed, oblivious to the fact that by "protecting the institution" at the cost of not doing what we all know the Constitution requires, they taught us the Constitution doesn't matter. 3/
Read 4 tweets
1 Aug
Here is Tom’s play so you nonlawyers understand it. He attempts to establish a basic principle, that vaccines in some circumstance can be made mandatory. But he doesn’t go through with the next part of the analysis, which are the facts specific to this particular situation. 1/
In fact, in the very rare instances when rights are implicated, the key is the analysis of the specific cracks. In this situation, we have a not very deadly virus, vaccines that aren’t perfect and variety of other factors. 2/
Typically, courts being asked to implicate a fundamental right, like not to have something injected into your body against your will, require the state to prove that its plan is the least restrictive alternative. 3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(