The Bombay HC passed an interim order on 14 Aug '21 staying Rules 9(1) and 9(3) as they violate Article 19(1)(a) and were beyond the rule-making power conferred by the Parliament on the Government. 🧵 👇🏽 1/n
Under the mechanism, a publisher must address the complaints, and its decision may be appealed to a body of publishers registered with the govt. These decisions may be appealed to an Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) that exclusively consists of central govt. bureaucrats. 3/n
The IDC also has the power to look at CoE complaints referred by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB). If found in violation, the IDC may recommend MIB to (amongst other things) warn, censure, admonish or reprimand the publisher, modify or even delete content! 4/n
Several digital news outlets, users, artists and organisations have challenged the constitutional validity of the #ITRules. Petitions are ongoing across various High Courts in the country.
i. Rules 9(1) and 9(3) prima facie violate the freedom of speech & expression.
ii. Obligation to conform to a Code of Ethics goes against IT Act 2000
iii. Norms of Journalistic Conduct were meant as guidelines, not as mandatory compliance. 6/n
NOTE: The Court has also made important observations on the importance of dissent in a democracy!
IFF welcomes the decision of the Bombay High Court. It provides much-needed relief to news writers, editors, publishers and content creators across the country. 7/n
At IFF, we will continue to support further action on the anti-democratic #ITRules, with a focus on social media users and online streaming services.
Become a part of the Indian digital rights revolution. Become an IFF member.
Oftentimes when people’s data is breached, it’s probably because they haven’t implemented the basic digital hygiene that goes a long way in protecting your data.
There are some simple steps you can (and should!) take to up your #DigitalSecurity game. We might sound like a broken record, but:
🕸 Set up 2 Factor Authentication
🕸 Create strong passwords
🕸 Use a password manager
🕸 Stay alert for phishing scams!
More details in 🧵 👇🏽 2/n
First, on passwords:
✅ Use unique passwords for each account
❌ Don’t use: DOB, partner/parent’s names or any info easily available in the public domain.
✅ Aim for at least 15 characters & a mix of letters, numbers + symbols.
✅ Use passphrases: they are harder to crack. 3/n
Hearing Update: The petitions challenging the constitutionality of the #IntermediaryRules are listed for final hearing as item no. 44 before the bench led by the Chief Justice at the Madras High Court today. 1/n
IFF has provided legal assistance to carnatic musician, author and activist @tmkrishna in his petition challenging the entirety of the Rules. 2/n
The issues raised in these petitions are extremely important. We have sought that the entirety of the Intermediary Rules, 2021 be struck down because it violates the freedom of speech, freedom to practice any profession, and the right to privacy of individuals. 3/n
The #Agristack is a collection of technology based interventions in the farming and agriculture sector that hold the potential to result in dramatic changes. Get an introduction to the project & its potential benefits and drawbacks 👇🏽 2/n
The #Agristack project will include farmers':
- Personal details
- Land profile
- Production & financial details
Its issues mainly revolve around its algorithmic nature that can spike loan rates & reduce agency of farmers. The risk of exclusion is also present. 3/n
It was reported that for BPL & anthyodaya cardholders, vaccination was compulsory to receive benefits. In the face of outrage, the #Karnataka DC clarified that no such order was passed. While this immediate threat has diminished, we've seen multiple such statements recently. 2/n
In the present context of the COVID-19 pandemic, to deny people essential rations (or other government benefits) for being unvaccinated would only exacerbate the existing food and nutrition crisis.
IMPORTANT: Are such steps even legal? We broke it down for you. 🧵 3/n
Pegasus Update: Today, the Supreme Court will hear the petitions on #PegasusProject disclosures today. IFF has provided legal assistance to Jharkhand based activists @RupeshKSingh85 and @IpsaShatakshi, as well as support to other journalists and civil society members. 1/n
The issues raised in these petitions are extremely important. The petitioners have asked the court to declare that the use of the #Pegasus spyware is unconstitutional, and direct the Union Government to protect Indian citizens from this #spyware. 2/n
On the last date of hearing, the SC issued a pre-admission notice to the Central Government in these petitions. Prior to that, the Union Government had filed an affidavit that did not confirm or deny its use of Pegasus. 3/n
Short statement : The justification of the State of Haryana to impose an internet shutdown in Karnal on September 7 is incompatible with the Anuradha Bhasin Guidelines. The basis of an internet shutdown cannot be a vague apprehension of loss of life and property. 1/n
The order apprehends “disruption of public utilities and safety” and links it to the ability of the internet to “spread misinformation and rumours”. However, all these statements lack any factual basis such as specific inputs or past incidents. 2/n
Supreme Court has also at times held that the right to assembly and protest are democratic forms of dissent that must not be restrained. Hence there is a state duty to protect a protest and ensure its safety. Shutting down internet services does not advance state objectives. 3/n