1: I’m absolutely thrilled to launch my new volume with colleague @MikeNelson—“The Korean Way With Data: How the World’s Most Wired Country is Forging a Third Way.” It’s part of our big buildout underway at @CarnegieEndow on technology futures in Asia: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/kor…
2: I’m deeply grateful to @KoreaFoundation for its support of the project, and to our fabulous Korean colleagues: Jang GyeHyun, Lim Jong-in, So Jeong Kim, Nohyoung Park, Sunha Bae, and Kyung Sin “KS” Park. @KoreaFoundUSA.
3. Many argue that the world is fracturing into two spheres—either a Sinocentric or US-centric order. As we move into the next phase of the digital transformation, what was once viewed as a commercial and technological competition is now framed as an existential geopolitical one.
4: But the US and China are not the world’s only major digital players. There has been a proliferation of policy and regulatory models, and international internet governance is up for grabs as countries experiment, innovate, and share their policy experiences and practices.
5: Data governance is one critical area of contention because it is increasingly central to next-generation industries and the future of rulemaking in the global economy. Countries such as South Korea and India have developed distinctive national approaches to data governance.
6: Neither country aims to imitate or adopt wholly American, much less Chinese, data policies and practices. They, too, have the potential to drive debates about technology business models and regulatory frameworks.
7: Korea, in particular, is a digital pacesetter because it is perhaps the world’s most connected country. Indeed, precisely *because* Korea is such a wired country, much can be learned by examining its policies and regulations in more detail.
8: Unfortunately, Korea’s digital policies are still not widely known, partly because little has been written in English about Korea’s distinctive frameworks, standards, and models. Yet Korea has over the past two decades pioneered approaches and accumulated a body of experience.
9: This volume digs deeply into what we call “the Korean way with data.” It explores Korea’s distinctive experiences, successes, failures, and recalibrations. And it aims to address the question of what can and should be learned from innovative Korean policies and practices.
10: The chapters in our new volume illustrate how the Korean government has tried to craft coherent and consistent policies in three important areas related to data: online authentication and data access control; cyber defense and data resilience; and data localization.
11: In each case, Korean policies have evolved by trial and error. Different approaches have been tried. When found to be inadequate, more workable approaches were found. The resulting frameworks could have broad resonance for countries struggling to address these three issues.
12: One reason Korean leadership could be so important is that the bifurcation of the world into a Sinosphere or an American sphere would not serve the interests of most countries. Many countries, even well-established democracies, are developing a hybrid approach.
13: And on data governance, in particular, there has been no putative American-led “Team Democracy” vs. a Chinese- led “Team Autocracy.” The chapters in our volume demonstrate that the future will be *much* more complex than a battle between US- and China-centric approaches.
14: The intensifying US-China battle is leading to trade disputes, restrictions on foreign investment, and, increasingly, bans on the use of foreign web services and apps. Yet countries like Korea have pioneered their own unique approaches to technology governance and regulation.
15: Korea may offer a third way—one that relies on practices and experiences developed and incubated in a successful democracy that has also carved out an important role for the state and sought a balance between public and private interests and state and market-based approaches.
16: In the Introduction, we lay out the parameters of the study and summarize the chapters and findings. We also look at key policy lessons of Korea’s digital experience and Korea’s opportunities amid technology geopolitics: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/int…
17: Online authentication and data access are essential for improving cybersecurity. Korea has seen a process of trial and error and persistent experimentation with various online authentication initiatives: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/tec…
18: Cyber defense and data resilience policies and solutions should be flexible, affordable, and easy-to-use. Korea may have a better way than the one-size-fits-all approaches of other countries: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/kor…
19: Korea could be a model for its trading partners, shaping and harmonizing policies for cross-border data flows. By demonstrating effective data protection measures, Korean firms can earn the trust of both Koreans and foreign companies: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/kor…
20: Because Seoul explicitly favors just three telecoms companies, there has been less vigorous competition and less investment. There are serious adverse consequences to Korea’s efforts to impose interconnection fees: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/aft…
21: I’m thrilled to be launching the project, had a blast doing this with Mike, am grateful to our Korean contributors, and also thank the experts who workshopped the volume with us: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/pro…
22: I’m also excited to launch into Year 2 of this effort, which will explore Korean and Indian approaches comparatively, with the participation of our incredible teammates at @CarnegieIndia.
23: #CarnegieAsia is moving in exciting new directions. And our growing suite of initiatives on Asian technology futures is a huge part of this. We're reaching beyond the usual US-China frame for a much deeper dive into how other tech and digital players are shaping the future.
24: I hope you'll read the volume. We think this is an incredibly exciting and most interesting contribution to the debates on Asia's future. Read here. And return often for even more exciting work from #CarnegieAsia. carnegieendowment.org/programs/asia/
25: We had a fantastic cast of collaborators on this, helping us to dig deeply into the Korean story and bring it to a larger audience in an English-language study. I can't thank them all enough: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/pro…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Evan Feigenbaum

Evan Feigenbaum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EvanFeigenbaum

4 Aug
1: China-funded railway projects in the Brazilian Amazon met a thicket of local resistance. In the Ferrogrão, Chinese and Brazilian players adapted. This terrific new paper in our @CarnegieEndow #ChinaLocalGlobal project explores these adaptive dynamics: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/04/wha…
2: The authors, @AAbdenur, @mafolly and @msantoro1978, show learning on both sides in the mitigation and management of socio-environmental risks around Chinese investments in Brazil's transportation infrastructure. They explore ongoing negotiations, plans, and controversies.
3: This paper is the latest in our seven-region #ChinaLocalGlobal initiative, which explores how China extends its influence by working through local actors and institutions while adapting and assimilating local and traditional forms, norms, and practices. Image
Read 9 tweets
15 Jun
1: Thread: Many argue that China exports its developmental model and imposes it on other countries. But Chinese players also extend their influence by working through local actors and institutions while adapting and assimilating local and traditional forms, norms, and practices.
2: With the generous support of @FordFoundation @CarnegieEndow is developing an innovative body of research on Chinese engagement in seven regions of the world—Africa, Central Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa, the Pacific, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.
3: The initiative, #ChinaLocalGlobal, involves a mix of textured country-specific and multi-country regional research, cross-regional comparative work, and (as COVID fades) some strategic convening. carnegieendowment.org/specialproject…
Read 10 tweets
13 Mar
1/6: THREAD ... Some of my recent work on the future of Taiwan's economic competitiveness ... Five easy pieces:
2/6: Taiwan’s innovation advantage is in danger of eroding. My dive into why it needs a revitalized and broadened strategy, more diverse investments in human capital and next-generation industries, and forward-looking partnerships, not least with the U.S.: carnegieendowment.org/2020/01/29/ass…
3/6: Taiwan needs to look not just to the energy it needs right now but also to the energy it will need 10-20 years from now if it is to power its future. My study of two paradigmatic transformation that are especially relevant to Taiwan’s energy future: carnegieendowment.org/2020/04/27/ove…
Read 6 tweets
15 Nov 20
1: Long thread follows … A lot of the commentary on RCEP today, some of which disses it as a minimalist trade deal, misses the point. If you’re American, you can’t just look at it while ignoring the larger context of 25 years of change in Asia.
2. The problem, especially for the American strategic class (of which I am a card-carrying member), is threefold:
3: The first strategic problem is that American power in this region has been premised on both security and economic pillars ...
Read 28 tweets
20 Aug 19
1/6: Thanks, and agree 100%, so it's not a rejoinder but a fact. Sadly, the US doesn't coordinate that especially well anymore. More important, I've argued over many years that the US seems oblivious to longer-term structural changes, in Asia especially, altering the landscape.
2/6: From 2011 (before the Belt and Road existed or Xi Jinping had yet taken power): Some of the writing of a more integrated Asia was already on the wall. I explored why the US had lost the plot in this essay, "Why America No Longer Gets Asia" in @TWQgw: csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/le…
@TWQgw 3/6: From 2009: Two decades of post-Asian Financial Crisis ideas threatened to marginalize the US (or alter its role without major adaptations from Washington). I explored with @Rmanning4 in this @CFR_org monograph on "The United States in the New Asia": cfr.org/asia-and-pacif…
Read 6 tweets
18 Aug 19
1. Thread ... I want to make a small China/FDI and Belt and Road comment, prompted by reading a few more pieces that dismiss the significance of the thing on grounds that China's pledges "don't add up" and its pledge numbers are "fake." This is a caveat from anecdotal experience.
2: In many places of the place where China Inc. or Chinese entities invest, I don’t think aggregate capital flows are a sufficient measure for understanding impact, real or prospective.
3: There are plenty of countries where the numbers aren’t large—and are often (much) smaller than advertised by the propaganda organs— but where China is either one of a very few outside investors or where global capital flows simply haven’t had an especially meaningful impact.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(