A little anecdote from 21 years ago … 17 months before 9/11 happened, when an aeroplane hijacked in Kabul landed at Stansted airport.

It was a scheduled domestic flight to Mazar-e Sharif and had 165 Afghan people on board ... 🧵
This was how the BBC reported the Government’s response in February 2000

Then Home Secretary Jack Straw refused to offer asylum to any of those on board fleeing the Taliban
If Straw’s response seemed callous, then check the response from then Leader of the Opposition William Hague:

"We must not allow this country to reinforce its growing image as a soft touch for asylum seekers."

This was the UK view of people fleeing the Taliban in 2000
In the parliamentary debate that followed only one MP mentioned the Taliban.

That was Alice Mahon asking Jack Straw, “will he keep in mind the odious nature of the Taleban regime, which has eliminated women's rights and murdered and tortured its own citizens on an hourly basis?”
Alice was a member of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs - a former nurse and MP for Halifax from 1987-2005

The only MP then to talk about the horrors of the Taliban and the issue of women's rights in Afghanistan
Only 2 passengers were granted asylum initially.

Of the unsuccessful applicants, Mr Straw said he was "not satisfied that they have a well founded fear of persecution" in their native land (Afghanistan in 2000, four years into Taliban rule)
theguardian.com/uk/2000/mar/01…
This retrospective 20 years on in @CambridgeNewsUK reveals:

"The High Court ruled on May 10 2006 that the gang of men [i.e. the hijackers] should have been admitted as genuine refugees and allowed to live and work in the UK freely."
cambridge-news.co.uk/news/local-new…
In that same parliamentary debate in 2000, @johnmcdonnellMP said,

"I hope that the incident will not be dragged into the current racist campaign that some parties are waging against asylum seekers. We need to weigh the import of our actions and words on such issues carefully."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fisher

Andrew Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FisherAndrew79

24 Aug
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the second Labour government falling when then Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald proposed a 20% cut in unemployment benefit

Today Johnson and Sunak are about to cut #UniversalCredit by 21%

My piece for @ipaperviews ...🧵
inews.co.uk/opinion/univer…
The Labour government was elected in 1929, just before the Wall Street Crash provoked a global depression. Despite many on the left of the party putting forward what would become known as Keynesian solutions, MacDonald and Snowden insisted on cuts to the incomes of the poorest
At Labour conference in 1930, James Maxton had attacked the leadership for their “timidity and vacillation” and said the Government should “use all its powers towards increasing the purchasing power of the workers, reducing workers’ hours, initiating a national housing programme”
Read 6 tweets
23 Jul
75 years ago today, on 23 July 1946, James Maxton died

He was Labour MP for Glasgow Bridgeton, which he had represented since 1922, and Leader of the Independent Labour Party 🌹✊
Maxton was a conscientious objector to World War I, and as a member of the Clyde Workers' Committee organised strikes for better pay, while also supporting the Glasgow rent strikes🌹🕊️✊
In 1931 Maxton addressed the Durham Miners Gala, saying:

"Every man who is genuinely anxious for the welfare of the workers is impatiently waiting for a new social order where poverty, tyranny and degradation will be unknown."
Read 5 tweets
21 Jul
Over the last two days, MPs debated the Nationality & Borders Bill which creates an even more hostile environment for refugees who reach our shores.

Labour voted against this racist legislation. And I want to highlight three outstanding speeches by backbench Labour MPs 1/n
Firstly, @BellRibeiroAddy:

"This horrendous piece of legislation ... does nothing to create safe routes for refugees, nothing to end the hostile environment, nothing to end the danger of unsafe asylum accommodation" 2/n
@BellRibeiroAddy "We are living through an age of mass displacement driven by war, poverty and climate breakdown …At times like this, the Government should not be dodging their moral and legal obligations to accept their fair share of refugees"

3/n
Read her full speech: hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-0…
Read 12 tweets
20 May
This is quite a misleading headline.

There is little that is unified about the government's new rail plan, and it falls far short of an integrated public system ... 🧵
bbc.co.uk/news/business-…
First, this is not public ownership.

The rail franchises will become concessions, but remain in private hands: the likes of Virgin, Arriva, Stagecoach et al will continue to extract profit from running services that charge some of the highest fares in Europe 2/n
During the pandemic the Government scrapped franchising to give fixed support to train firms - a £3.5bn bailout

Depending on the detail of new concessions, this system could allow for MORE profits to be made by the private companies that will still be running rail services 3/n
Read 5 tweets
16 May
On this day four years ago, Labour officially launched its manifesto for the 2017 General Election, For the Many Not the Few, at Bradford University ... 🧵🌹 Image
Though that was the official launch, a near final draft of the manifesto had been leaked to the press a few days earlier.

The Daily Mail described it as a “new suicide note” that would “renationalise rail, energy and post” ... Image
As it turned out, those policies proved popular.

Who’d have thought? The Daily Mail isn’t some divine oracle of public opinion in Britain …
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Read 6 tweets
6 Apr
What's most interesting about the @CWUnews/@Survation polling in Hartlepool is the policy stuff, which bears out the findings of the @LabourTogether report - and all the polling of Labour's policies in both 2017 & 2019.

i.e. Labour's core policies (under Corbyn) were v popular🧵
So for example, 69% of Hartlepool voters back Labour's free universal full-fibre broadband policy (derided by some as "Broadband Communism" at the time)

If anything, the pandemic (and our consequent reliance on Zoom) has made this policy even more popular
And a clear majority (57%) want Royal Mail back in public ownership

People can see that postal services and the internet (communications) are natural monopolies and should be delivered in the public interest not for profit

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(