In DeFi today, liquidity is one of the hardest things to bootstrap for a new protocol. To incentivize users to provide liquidity, protocols will reward you with their native token by staking the LP (Often known as pool2's).

🧵👇:
While liquidity mining was a novel idea that sparked DeFi, one question left unanswered is "what happens when rewards run out?". Some say that the fees generated will be enough for the users, but in my opinion, they'll quickly move onto their liquidity onto the next pool2.
These protocols are so dependent on these liquidity pool providers that they offer massive incentives in order to keep the LP providers satisfied.

for reference, @AlchemixFi , @feiprotocol , and @TokenReactor provides 100%, 85%, and 566% APR for LP.
@OlympusDAO removes this dependence of liquidity by outright paying for the liquidity (via bonds), rather than rewarding those who LP. Initially Olympus did have a Pool2, but phased it out after they obtained a significant percentage of liquidity.
The results speak for themselves: Olymous owns the super majority of the OHM-DAI and the OHM-FRAX pool, with the OHM-DAI being one of the most liquid pairs on @SushiSwap. ImageImage
This is liquidity that not only the protocol can depend on, but as the user as well! Users are now confident that liquidity providers won't pull out when the market goes on a downturn. It also provides a constant revenue source for the protocol (1m+ in fees to date).
This is akin to buying a home, instead of renting a home. The initial cost of doing this may be significant, but in the long run, should pay for itself over the long run.
As the space evolves, I can see @OlympusDAO influencing and empowering every DeFi protocol today.
Instead of paying 100% APR to current LP, protocols could pay 80% APR for Olympus to bootstrap, maintain, and hold their LP in their Treasury, guaranteeing stability indefinitely.
The protocol can guarantee liquidity for their users, and Olympus gets to diversify their Treasury, as well as increase the use cases for the OHM token. Truly a win-win scenario.
This thread was inspired by @ohmzeus tweet a couple of weeks ago. See the potential of @OlympusDAO and join the Ohmies!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with WAGMI (3,3)

WAGMI (3,3) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wagmianon

12 Sep
@OlympusDAO's quest to begin branching to other layers begins with OIP-25, deploying Olympus to Arbitrum
forum.olympusdao.finance/d/102-oip-25-d…
🧵👇
Arbitrum has just been released, a layer 2 solution which offers the same security as ETH L1 with vastly lower fees.

With NFT minting on the rise, this is sorely needed in order to reduce friction in our ecosystem.
In other to bootstrap liquidity, we'll be using the wETH obtained the wETH bonds, and mint OHM to create a 3.4 million OHM-wETH pool on arbitrum.

Since we'll be using all the wETH, we can now get more wETH from our existing wETH bonds (5% more wETH in our treasury? no-brainer)
Read 8 tweets
2 Sep
@OlympusDAO was the first protocol to ultilize a protocol controlled treasury via bonding. This mechanism can be used in many different ways—@KlimaDAO will use this mechanism to amass carbon tons, forcing quicker adoption of low carbon technology.

🧵👇:
Climate change is one of the biggest issues of our generation. One way we incentivize eco-friendly decisions is through carbon credits. If your project reduces or destroys a tonne of carbon, you’re entitled to 1 carbon credit, which can be sold on the open market.
The problem with this is that the open market doesn’t value carbon at a fair price—it can wildly vary between 1-30$. Unpredictable demand, limited price data availability, scare financing are some of the factors that attribute to this.
Read 11 tweets
3 Aug
Bond prices at @OlympusDAO are mainly determined by 2 factors: the Bond Control Variable (BCV), and the debt ratio of the protocol. This is cool and all, but what does it really mean?
🧵on the inner workings of bonds 👇:
First, a refresher on bonds:
Bonds are the main source of revenue for the protocol. When you bond, you’re buying OHM from the protocol instead of the open market, for a better price. Since the protocol values every OHM at 1 USD, it makes money off the arbitrage on the trade.
We’ll start with the debt ratio of the protocol: this is determined by the unrealized revenue from bonds divided by the total supply of OHM. Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(