The Israeli MoH released some results about the effectiveness of the booster to tame infection rate.
Behavior or immunity or both?
A short technical thread with interesting results.
๐งต๐งต๐งต
Israel does not conduct an RCT for the third dose. Thus, the main analysis for booster-VE is comparing the cases in boosted vs 2nd dosed as a proxy for increased protection. But boosted individuals might be โฌ๏ธcovid19-worried, leading to lower โฌ๏ธexposure.
To mitigate that, the MoH adjusted for basic demography and calendar day of infection and reported the graph below. Y-axis: Booster vs 2nd dose fold protection as a function of days from booster.
But there is something weird...๐ง
Check out the blue arrow. The booster is super effective 1 day after the jab and it starts to exponentially drop until day 6 before going up! How can it be? From immunological perspective, your memory cells just started working after the first day...
Here is my theory: the booster can create covid-like symptoms and people know that. So if a person feels bad the day after, he would say to himself: "Haim, relax. It is just the booster" and not get tested. Same thing if they have symptoms at the 2nd day but to a smaller extent.
and the process of delay in testing continues for a few days. This behavioral effect is so strong that it easily creates VE-booster of 2x-6x improvements in the first few days, which quickly wanes. The basic adjustments of the MOH are not enough to such behavioral diff.
So I am happy to see the increase in the VE-booster in later days and SURE that it does improve the situation.
However, it is clear that not all biases were addressed in this analysis.
For instance, if 10% of people felt like a wreck after the booster and stayed home, exposure will go down; if people who completed the 13th day can be the most covid-worried, exposureโฌ๏ธ. Again, I do think booster WORKS but would wait for more final numbers.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Important data from Israel: the relative protection against contracting Covid19 at the 4th wave as a function of vax/prior reinfection status. The data is calibrated to RR=1 for people who received 2nd dose in Jan and no booster.
A few thoughts below on waning protection๐
One important take away is that a prior infection protects you but can wane without a vax. People who contracted covid during the 2nd wave (Sep-Oct 20; dark red) have 1.9x risk to get delta compared to people who contracted Covid during the 3d wave (Jan-Feb 21; light red).
Recall that Alpha (3rd wave) is not closer to Delta (4th wave) than the ancestral strain (2nd wave). So it is reasonable to assume that diff are due to waning immunity.
This means that a recovered person looses ~15% of the protection per month. After 2yrs =~ no protection.
Interesting data about the performance of boosted as a function of time. Y: protection compared to 2 doses. X: days from booster.
There is an increase in protection with time after day 7. This reduces the chance of a behavioral effect (but not completely mitigate it)
These results are more puzzling. From right to left: days, # cases, # severe. Top line ๐๐. Bottom: ๐๐๐ >10days
Why puzzling? Because rate of (boosted severe/)(boosted cases) is ~5%. We saw a similar rate earlier in with only 2nd dose. Don't know how to explain that.
Notice the massive reported decline in VE even WITHIN the same flu season! The implications for public health cannot be more important. We usually offer flu shorts in the early fall (Sep), while the peak season is in the Winter (Jan-Feb). Should we reconsider our approach?