But, if you're seeing this, here's a short summary:
These changes in rules can mean a huge & unexpected loss of income.
As far as we can tell from our still-in-progress research, many OF creators are new to S*x W*rk. While experienced S*x W*rkers were anticipating the realities of deplatforming, less experienced folks may not be.
While you may think of OF as a side gig, for many people, it's not.
Some examples of who will be effected:
There are people who switched to OF when they got laid off during the pandemic or lost their childcare and may have nowhere else to turn / will experience sudden drop in income that can lead to homelessness
There are foster kids who aged out of the system and decided OF was the best career for them
There are many people, including these younger folks, who may not have account for the fact that the OF content they may made now prevent them from getting jobs
And of course, there are folks who were in the industry before, but for whom OF brought much needed financial welfare who are once again faced with precarity.
Imagine if your income was suddenly cut, you're not eligible for unemployment (often the case for S*x W*rkers), & your prior work makes you ineligible for jobs & stigmatized from receiving assistance from your family or community.
This is the impact of deplatforming adult work.
And no, these folks who chose to do OF didn't make a "bad choice".
We all must do labor in a capitalist economy. These folks chose labor that is legal, for which there is a market desire, and which was the right fit for their life and circumstances.
And books on sex work as labor (and much more than labour) @drjonessoc Camming, @DrHeatherBerg Porn Work
And on the insidious ways our morality effects youth: @amyadele Sexting Panic
+ @kkatot scholarship
Please keep sharing literature! (Including your own work.)
And for a full list of literature by sex worker scholars (pop press, academic, & general writings) see this amazing repository assembled by @drjonessoc@DrHeatherBerg
Anti-adult work policies, often driven from American morality (for OF: the morality of their payment processors & the people lobbying them) put marginalized people - often women, people of color, and LGBTQ folk - at serious risk.
Sometimes as a security researcher I'm shocked that the assumptions we make: that every system can be broken, that no system is truly private are rarely held by the broader CS community.
A short thread of recent examples.
In preparing COVID19 ppr, I'm reminded of our efforts to submit the initial work on people's willingness to adopt based on privacy vs. accuracy @NeurIPSConf.
Reviewers claimed it was unnecessary to consider privacy in a decentralized system because it was perfectly private.
@airbnb uses AI to detect whether a user is a sex worker, mentally ill, or otherwise "un-desirable".
Based on this algorithm, #airbnb bans these folks, even if they were *not* looking to use the property for e.g., #sexwork.
Multiple sex workers we interviewed in Europe (Germany/Switzerland) reported this problem extensively, even though sex work is not illegal behavior.
This is a classic case, as many workers discussed, of Americanized-tech damagingly applying our "ethics" to the rest of the world
Our interview data further confirms the prevalence of this practice internationally, which denies legal sex workers, among other groups determined undesirable by AI, from participating in a large and fast growing part of the gig economy, when they are gig workers themselves!