Cowardly Jenny Jones does not care for debate about the origins and philosophy and MO of her political tendency.

Greens don't do debate. There is no culture of debate in environmentalism. It expects only obedience.
Bizarre Jennie Jones doesn't mind her coreligionists depriving you of your freedom of movement, and the means by which millions make a living, but she is bothered by robust, free, open, democratic debate.

@thejamesmax @talkRADIO

In the green view, debate is 'abuse' and having a different opinion is 'lies'.

Greens are people who didn't hear the word 'no' until it was far, far, far too late for them to understand what it means.

It is a developmental disorder.
I am serious.

Leaving aside the democratic problems of the HoL, she is not equipped to be in a position of responsibility.

She has no answer to challenges to her position. She doesn't think it needs to be debated. She doesn't think there can be a valid criticism of her ideas.
Jones thinks that blocking traffic is a 'democratic right to protest'.

The right to protest may well include routes that require closure to traffic in order to accommodate a march.

But it doesn't include blocking traffic as "protest".

The right to travel is democracy, too.
Simply not equipped for debate...
The fact and the problem for Jenny Jones and XR is that *vastly* more people want to use the roads than adhere to their extreme ideology.

If anyone disagrees, or dares to point out the fact, Jones' only answer is to screech "BIGOT!" at them.
For example, this is her answer to the point that blocking the roads obstructs access to one of London's most important hospitals.

It doesn't matter what the protesters let through, it's the traffic jam that obstructs.

Jones believes it is her 'democratic right' to kill people.
XR and the Green Party have made their case. Nobody in the country has not heard it. But after hearing it, very few people are moved by it sufficiently to vote for her party or to abandon the things that are necessary for their day-to-day lives.

Let's have a vote on it.
Greens are manifestly insane, unhinged, not capable of reason.

Why is green ideology so dominant in Britain?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

12 Sep
I've said it before and I will say it again...

Electric cars are a bridging technology to having no cars.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
This was obvious to anyone with a brain.

To abolish petrol and diesel cars is to manufacture scarcity.

Then, cars would have to compete with home heating, industry, businesses and hydrogen production. Prices would spiral out of control.
To point it out is to deny global warming, you see.

You must not challenge the Utopian design or you will be accused of being anti-science.
Read 5 tweets
11 Sep
The solution to 'plastic pollution' is to not put waste plastic in the sea.

But unaccountable, antidemocratic ideological zealots do not like solutions. They like power.

Green ideology is a bigger threat to the world than plastic.

Let's ban environmentalism, not plastic.
Almost nobody disagrees: let's not put waste plastic in the sea.

Being against putting waste plastic in the sea is not environmentalism.

Environmentalists DO NOT WANT there to be an easy way to deal with waste plastic.
But plastic may well be the best substance to use, even in single-use applications.

* It is the least resource-intensive

* It is clean and robust

* it is in fact easy to dispose of

And that is why greens hate it.
Read 4 tweets
10 Sep
Also, looking at the camera through eyes peering under eyebrows, head tilted forward a la Hancock is the vapid politician's new 'power stance'.
Image
Read 5 tweets
24 Aug
On the face of it, a nice rant about XR. But if you caveat your criticism with the necessity of 'tackling our carbon footprint', that you're 'no climate change denier' and that single-use plastic is unnecessary, then you have done XR's bidding.

You can't make a distinction between XR's objectives and their methods.

In fact XR are perhaps unique in their being the most honest about their outlook -- far more honest than any academics, scientists, journalist or politicians. But it's the same outlook.
That philosophy is anti-human, through-and-through.

It's simply more obvious in XR, as XR are in general too thick in the head to disguise what others are mealy-mouthed about.

There is no difference between street-level environmentalism and establishment environmentalism.
Read 9 tweets
23 Aug
She flew away to take hallucinogenic drugs.

She's an idiot, not just a hypocrite.
And she's a liar, too.
Save the planet, take a trip...

newscientist.com/article/221378…
Read 4 tweets
23 Aug
Because he had nothing better to do.

It really is the party of the idle rich.
He offers no actual reasons other than, "...one thing I’m certain of is that if Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsey, Tamsin Omond and Amelia Womack were all elected to Westminster, this would already be a better country to live in."

Which is fair enough. But bonkers.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(